I am not quite sure if I loaded the service pack or not.  I think I was usin
g 2000.   I might save all of my pages in the 2000 version on disk, wipe out
 2003 and reload 2000.  I am getting a lot of complaints from consumers that
 the website is not as func
tional as it was.

Here is a sample of my website if you would like to take a look:

http://animalshare.wantapet.com/ani...tics/index.html

Thanks to both of you for your responses, this is the first time I have post
ed questions.  I have used this forum and your FAQ webpage to answer all of 
my other questions.

Mark Mertens



"David Bartosik - MS MVP" wrote:

> In your 2002 did you load service pack 1?
> If so then your pages where "filtered" and are slightly similar to 2003.
> See my comparison at www.davidbartosik.com/pub11.htm
> If you did not have SP 1 then your 2002 pages would be much much much much
> more bloated then 2003.
>
> --
> David Bartosik - MS MVP
> for Publisher help:
> www.davidbartosik.com
> enter to win Pub 2003:
> www.davidbartosik.com/giveaway.aspx
>
>
> "Mertens" <Mertens@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:14025D2D-9BB1-449F-8080-0E5F64428BF9@microsoft.com... 
> 2003?  My website in 2002 was much more user friendly.  It bothers me now
> that the images on my website take so much longer to load than they did in
> publisher 2002. 
>
>
>

The functionality complaints might be from non IE users. 2000 set to the 3.0
target setting will give you pretty good cross browser support whereas 2003
is designed for IE 5+ only.

Due to the way 2003 handles graphics I can't recommend it for a site that is
graphic intensive like yours. The simplicity in 2000 would be a better fit
in that respect.

Just look at the pros and cons of each one. good luck.

--
David Bartosik - MS MVP
for Publisher help:
www.davidbartosik.com
enter to win Pub 2003:
www.davidbartosik.com/giveaway.aspx


"Mertens" <Mertens@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9A28E661-383D-421C-819F-E40BE1BEE71C@microsoft.com...
> I am not quite sure if I loaded the service pack or not.  I think I was
using 2000.   I might save all of my pages in the 2000 version on disk, wipe
out 2003 and reload 2000.  I am getting a lot of complaints from consumers
that the website is not as functional as it was.
>
> Here is a sample of my website if you would like to take a look:
>
> http://animalshare.wantapet.com/ani...tics/index.html
>
> Thanks to both of you for your responses, this is the first time I have
posted questions.  I have used this forum and your FAQ webpage to answer all
of my other questions.
>
> Mark Mertens
>
>
>
> "David Bartosik - MS MVP" wrote:
> 
much 
in 
now 
in 

Can you promise M$ will not orphan Publisher 2000?  Will it work in the next
version of Winbloz?  Based on past experience with older software, it scares
 me
to me stranded in Publisher 2000.  I suspect you MVPs are mostly a young bun
ch
with limited long term perspective; I could be wrong, of course.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:08:12 -0500, "David Bartosik - MS MVP"
<forums@davidbartosik.com> wrote:

>The functionality complaints might be from non IE users. 2000 set to the 3.
0
>target setting will give you pretty good cross browser support whereas 2003
>is designed for IE 5+ only.
>
>Due to the way 2003 handles graphics I can't recommend it for a site that i
s
>graphic intensive like yours. The simplicity in 2000 would be a better fit
>in that respect.
>
>Just look at the pros and cons of each one. good luck.

Hi analog@logwell.com (analog@logwell.com),
in the newsgroups
you posted:

|| I suspect
|| you MVPs are mostly a young bunch with limited long term
|| perspective; I could be wrong, of course.

Not young here! I will be 32 in September.
--
Brian Kvalheim
Microsoft Publisher MVP
http://www.publishermvps.com
~pay it forward~

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.

Young? Me? Thank you.  :-)

--
JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]



<analog@logwell.com> wrote in message
news:bf2ed0pdkfhgosbi8357nreusart96us01@4ax.com...
> Can you promise M$ will not orphan Publisher 2000?  Will it work in the
> next
> version of Winbloz?  Based on past experience with older software, it
> scares me
> to me stranded in Publisher 2000.  I suspect you MVPs are mostly a young
> bunch
> with limited long term perspective; I could be wrong, of course.
>
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:08:12 -0500, "David Bartosik - MS MVP"
> <forums@davidbartosik.com> wrote:
> 
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 6/18/2004

Tee hee! I've got socks older than you!

--
JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]



"Brian Kvalheim - [MSFT MVP]" <bkvalheim@publishermvps.com> wrote in mes
sage
news:uC$5Je7VEHA.3988@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi analog@logwell.com (analog@logwell.com),
> in the newsgroups
> you posted:
>
> || I suspect
> || you MVPs are mostly a young bunch with limited long term
> || perspective; I could be wrong, of course.
>
> Not young here! I will be 32 in September.
> --
> Brian Kvalheim
> Microsoft Publisher MVP
> http://www.publishermvps.com
> ~pay it forward~
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> confers no rights.
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 6/18/2004

Hi JoAnn Paules (jpaules@publishermvps.com),
in the newsgroups
you posted:

|| Tee hee! I've got socks older than you!

Has it been 30+ years since you washed them too? :-)
--
Brian Kvalheim
Microsoft Publisher MVP
http://www.publishermvps.com
~pay it forward~

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.

Yep - and they still smell better than you!  :-P

--
JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]



"Brian Kvalheim - [MSFT MVP]" <bkvalheim@publishermvps.com> wrote in mes
sage
news:eIEYaP8VEHA.4024@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi JoAnn Paules (jpaules@publishermvps.com),
> in the newsgroups
> you posted:
>
> || Tee hee! I've got socks older than you!
>
> Has it been 30+ years since you washed them too? :-)
> --
> Brian Kvalheim
> Microsoft Publisher MVP
> http://www.publishermvps.com
> ~pay it forward~
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> confers no rights.
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 6/18/2004

That is pretty young my friend.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:42:31 -0500, "Brian Kvalheim - [MSFT MVP]"
<bkvalheim@publishermvps.com> wrote:

>Hi analog@logwell.com (analog@logwell.com),
>in the newsgroups
>you posted:
>
>|| I suspect
>|| you MVPs are mostly a young bunch with limited long term
>|| perspective; I could be wrong, of course.
>
>Not young here! I will be 32 in September.

Honest truth is that I have shoes older than him.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:58:20 -0400, "JoAnn Paules" <jpaules@publishermvps.co
m>
wrote:

>Tee hee! I've got socks older than you!