|
Convenient web based access to our favorite web design Usenet groups
|
 |
This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
| Author |
| Thread |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Re: B & W from Colour problem for photocopying. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
  05-28-04 - 04:14 AM
|
>Our Church has an Analogue photo copier for it's newsletters etc.
>I have tried converting my colour digital photos to B&W using Grayscale,
>Colour
>Channels, Channel Mixers & other experiments, but the result is always tota
lly
>unacceptable when photocopied...
Before you go any farther: How are you printing the image? What kind of prin
ter
are you using?
You can get excellent results from a photocopier, if you are printing the im
age
correctly; the way you print the image, and the kind of printer you use, is
critical.
To get decent results from a photocopier, you should not use an inkjet
printout, you should use a halftoned printout from a laser printer.
If you have a PostScript laser printer, set the laser printer to use an 85 l
ine
halftone (or less). If you have a laser printer that is not PostScript, you
can
get good results by using Image->Mode->Bitmap. In the Bitmap dialog, choose
Output Resolution: 1200 dpi, Halftone, 85 lines per inch, Round dot.
To prepare the image before you do this, use the Curves command. In the Curv
es
command, pull the midtone down about 10-15%, and pull the shadow end down so
it
is no more than 85% printing. the result will look washed-out on your comput
er
screen, but will darken up again on the photocopier.
Then, print it with an 85-line halftone, or convert it to bitmap with an
85-line screen, and try that.
Printing to an inkjet printer will likely produce extremely poor results whe
n
photocopying, unless the photocopier has an "artwork" or "photograph"
setting--typically found only on high-end photocopiers.
--
Biohazard? Radiation hazard? SO last-century.
Nanohazard T-shirts now available! http://www.villaintees.com
Art, literature, shareware, polyamory, kink, and more:
http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
|
|
|
| [
Post Follow-Up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Re: B & W from Colour problem for photocopying. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
  05-28-04 - 04:14 AM
|
macknife@ihug.co.nz (Mac Lynch) writes:
> Kia Ora
> Our Church has an Analogue photo copier for it's newsletters etc.
> I have tried converting my colour digital photos to B&W using Grayscale, C
olour
> Channels, Channel Mixers & other experiments, but the result is always tot
ally
> unacceptable when photocopied, usually too dark even when lightened as muc
h as
> possible.
> On the other hand, some seemingly random colour photos straight copied com
e out
> reasonably well.
> Is there a hue or contrast or other factor I might use to trick the photoc
opier
> to produce an acceptable result? I am not expecting magic!
OK, as I understand it, you are taking a color image file, converting
to monochrome in the computer, printing, and copying the result. Could
the problem really be an incompatibility between the printer and the
copier? If the copier has some odd sort of spectral response, it's
possible that your printer (inkjet?) is using inks with spectral
curves that are incompatible with the copier.
--
-Stephen H. Westin
Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.
|
|
|
| [
Post Follow-Up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Re: B & W from Colour problem for photocopying. |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
  05-28-04 - 04:14 AM
|
>You presume too much this time, Tacit. You have no idea what kind of
>photocopier he is using. My assumption is that is yet another stump-stupid
>high contrast copier. Nothing in the world can help such a machine.
I've actually achieved very good results from such a photocopier, provided t
he
images are halftoned with a coarse (63-85) line screen. A halftoned image ha
s
only two tones--black and white--and you can, with some skill, get remarkabl
y
good results from a normal photocopier. Hell, I published small-press magazi
nes
that way for *years*! :)
--
Biohazard? Radiation hazard? SO last-century.
Nanohazard T-shirts now available! http://www.villaintees.com
Art, literature, shareware, polyamory, kink, and more:
http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
|
|
|
| [
Post Follow-Up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08 AM. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|  |
|