Crescent Grove, Clapham Common (2/Dec/2000)

Certainty level: 100%

This is one of those clips where I am absolutely, 100% certain it's
inflicted by MI5 on me, because of background, context. On Saturday
2 December 2000, I was walking from my home to a pub on Clapham Common,
and on the way was in proximity to a group of three English youths
who were walking the other way. They turned from the main road into a
private estate called Crescent Grove. Here is what they said;

(first youth) "He masturbates!"
(his mate responds) "Yeah, he masturbates!"
(and again) "Thief!"

There is a lot of context associated with this incident, which I will now
relate.

Firstly, the verbal sexual abuse is a popular one with MI5, and as a stateme
nt
about me is currently mostly in their imaginations. The accusation has to be
 seen
relative to MI5's persecutory actions in late November and early December 20
00,
and in fact for some months leading up to this. Their relevant activities in
June 2000 are documented in a message in this evidence item;
following from that, they sent someone to simulate an act in front of my win
dow,
which was captured on film.

It is the publication of the video of their agent performing the act on hims
elf
which caused MI5 to restart this thread of harassment in the first few days 
of
December 2000. But there are some subtleties; I uploaded the digitised video
to this website on 26/November/2000; but I did not announce its existence on
 the
newsgroups until Sunday 3/December/2000. These youths' slur was made the pre
vious
day, on Saturday 2/Dec. That tells us quite a lot. According to my website l
ogs,
there were no accesses to the video file before Sunday 3/Dec. So why did MI5
 restart
this particular thread of abuse, before their agent's activities were
published on the newsgroup? The conclusion we reach is that they were watchi
ng my
internet connection, either decoding the telephone line, or at the ISP; and/
or they
may be able to physically see what is on my notebook computer's screen, from
RF transmissions from its VGA circuitry. I do not know whether the latter is
technically feasible, but the former certainly is, and I have known for year
s
that MI5 bugs my internet activities and phone calls. It is from their obser
vation
of my internet connection that they were able to tell, without accessing the
video file over the net, that it was of their agent in a compromising positi
on;
and it was from that observation that their shouted slur on 2/Dec emanates.

The second accusation, "Thief!", is even more interesting. It relates to occ
urrences
from June of 2000, some six months before these youths threw the word at me.
 It shows
just how wide in reach geographically and temporally the MI5 persecution is;
they react to something which happened half a year previously.

In the first half of 2000, MI5 made a determined assault on my friendships. 
In one
particular case, that of A. whom I had known for virtually all my life, they
 partly
succeeded. This person made pointed references to me which made it clear he 
knew
what was happening; at one point he started asking "do you know anything abo
ut the
FBI and the CIA". In June 2000, we went to see a film in the West End. I pai
d for
both of us, and then asked him to return what I had paid for his ticket, som
e £7.50.
He was reluctant to do so. Eventually he returned £5, settling for the lesse
r gain of £2.50.

I did not call him a thief to his face, but I may have spoken the word while
 I was
at home, either conscious or in my sleep. MI5 have very tight control over e
verything
I do and say in my home through their bugs; if I say anything against someon
e in
"their" camp, they turn round the accusation against me. So, from the fact t
hat A.
tried to garner a few pounds at my expense, MI5 create the accusation, six m
onths
later..... "thief!".

20657


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access