JoeB wrote:
> "Joske"  wrote 
[snips]
 
 
 

> Seeing your post, I refreshed my reader to see what was going on
> (I don't usually bother with Jerry's posts anymore).  I was not
> surprised to see that, here in usenet, his vulgar side (what he
> describes as free speech) is just about all he displays.  He uses
> usenet to vent, not to help people with questions.

> I also note that a couple of days ago he admitted he was sick and
> that's why he keeps these adversarial things going.  And then I
> saw a post today where he admitted he gets his "kicks" (that's my
> euphamism - he was more explicit) from these exchanges.  It was
> sad, and kind of off-putting, but one has to accept that some
> minority find their pleasure where they can.

> Might be best just to not reply to any of his posts, whether here
> or in other groups, as he might get the same "satisfaction" even
> in groups where he might have to be polite.  Just getting a
> response to a post might be enough for him.  As I said, sad and
> off-putting, but that's one reason I don't respond to any of his
> stuff.

> Just a thought, and only suggested because yours is the first
> reply to him that I've seen from the normal users in this group,
> and is what prompted me to search back to see what was happening
> - which is obviously the same old stuff as regards Jerry.

Hi there too, Joe.

I see no reason to not very incidentally respond to his foul attacks
on people here - this person will retaliate (his own word) here for
what he imagines people did to him on the C server anyway. It does
not hurt to add a little counterweight now and then.

There'll always be someone replying to this person's posts on
Corel's server. Every reply by an innocent serves as a justification
for him to stay, even though most, especially non-Americans and
women, must be nonplussed by his prolonged presence.

As to your other euphemistically worded observation, who knows why a
grown man and father needs to write such self-degrading drivel.

By the way, I assume you noticed the Corel newsgroup TOS was updated
recently.

Joske
--
http://members.home.nl/j.a.c.backer/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN7y0Sb0s6Y

"Joske" <j.backerREMOVEME@home.nl> wrote in news:e7l1rq$jo$1
@news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl:

> JoeB wrote: 
Hiltz 
> [snips]
> 
> 
censored NG 
YOu 
> 
for 
their 
unsingular to 
> 
on 
not 
he 
uses 
> 
and 
I 
my 
was 
> 
here 
even 
and 
his 
> 
group, 
happening 
>
> Hi there too, Joe.
>
> I see no reason to not very incidentally respond to his foul
attacks
> on people here - this person will retaliate (his own word) here
for
> what he imagines people did to him on the C server anyway. It
does
> not hurt to add a little counterweight now and then.
>
> There'll always be someone replying to this person's posts on
> Corel's server. Every reply by an innocent serves as a
justification
> for him to stay, even though most, especially non-Americans and
> women, must be nonplussed by his prolonged presence.
>
> As to your other euphemistically worded observation, who knows
why a
> grown man and father needs to write such self-degrading drivel.
>
> By the way, I assume you noticed the Corel newsgroup TOS was
updated
> recently.
>
> Joske

No I hadn't, but have see it now.  I guess they just decided to
explicitly set out terms they likely figured most people would
have assumed anyway, as a result of a few posts in the past.

Regards,

JoeB

Today, with great enthusiasm and quite emphatically, JoeB laid
this on an unsuspecting readership ...
 

Yepper! My First Amendment rights to free speech are severely
abrided on CNews, but not here, mrs. joske, but if you're weren't
so pathologically stupid, you wouldn't be the target of any
abuse. All of you miscreants should rent the Sylvester Stallone
movie "First Blood", the first of the Rambo series. You people
all seem to have a fatal case of OCD (Obsessive Compulsive
Disorder) because you clearly cannot resist the urge to take me
on, no matter how imbecilic that makes you look. So, I "help" you
in any way I can to see that YOUR behavior das ist verboten to
me.
 
>
> No I hadn't, but have see it now.  I guess they just decided
> to explicitly set out terms they likely figured most people
> would have assumed anyway, as a result of a few posts in the
> past.
>
> Regards,
>
> JoeB

Joe, you should be wary of lecturing me obliquely, much less
explicitly.

--
ATM, aka Jerry

"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm!" - Ralph
Waldo Emerson