The design window just shows a white box where my table is. The page display
s
perfect on the internet, but when I go to edit it I have to use only code
becuase I can't see anything but a huge white square. Can anyone help?

rho42 wrote:

> The design window just shows a white box where my table is. The page displ
ays
> perfect on the internet, but when I go to edit it I have to use only code
> becuase I can't see anything but a huge white square. Can anyone help?
>
Paste your page code here or give a link to the page. The answer is in
your code and we need to see that.

my address is http://cashspot.co.nr

Validating this page would show immediately that the table on it has serious
problems.  It can also give you a clue as to which tags are munged....

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Osgood" <notavailable@atthisaddress.com> wrote in message
news:du17s5$s2u$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> rho42 wrote:
> 
>
>
> Your code is buggared up. Missing tags which are causing display problems
> for your tables. I'm not sure I can be of much help finding which tag
> pairs with which and what is missing.
>

"Murray *ACE*" <forums@HAHAgreat-web-sights.com> wrote in message
news:du1hca$bo7
> which tags are munged...



what... given up on 'ganked'  ;-)


--
Nadia
Adobe Community Expert
--------------------------------------------
http://www.csstemplates.com.au  - CSS Templates | Free Templates
http://www.DreamweaverResources.com - Dropdown Menu Templates|Tutorials
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/dreamweaver/css.html - CSS Tutorials
-------------------------------------------------

Yeah - it was pointed out to me that gank (being the anastimosis of 'grab'
and 'yank') has a connotation of having been stolen.

I'm still trying out 'horked' - it seems to work well too.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


".: Nadia :. *ACE*" <nadia@REMOVETHISdreamweaverresources.com> wrote in
message news:du1hic$c39$1@forums.macromedia.com...
>
> "Murray *ACE*" <forums@HAHAgreat-web-sights.com> wrote in message
> news:du1hca$bo7 
>
>
>
> what... given up on 'ganked'  ;-)
>
>
> --
> Nadia
> Adobe Community Expert
> --------------------------------------------
> http://www.csstemplates.com.au  - CSS Templates | Free Templates
> http://www.DreamweaverResources.com - Dropdown Menu Templates|Tutorials
> http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/dreamweaver/css.html - CSS Tutorials
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Murray *ACE* wrote:

> Validating this page would show immediately that the table on it has serio
us
> problems.  It can also give you a clue as to which tags are munged....
>
I know what tags are munged. I can see that in DW. I just can't find the
pairing for each tag, neithier will the validator. It will tell you
there is an unclosed tag/s but it doesn't mean that if you close it
anything will change.

The code can be so badly manged that its like finding a needle in a
haystack.

"Murray *ACE*" <forums@HAHAgreat-web-sights.com> wrote in message
> Yeah - it was pointed out to me that gank (being the anastimosis of 'grab'
> and 'yank')

We can't have that now.. Murray - grabbing and yanking  <lol>

> I'm still trying out 'horked' - it seems to work well too.

that's horrid - I'd stick to munged...  :)

Nadia

> I know what tags are munged. I can see that in DW.

So, you DO use validation then? 8)

Most people who post here with those kinds of train wreck code have no clue
about DW's validation.  Asking them to validate at the W3C site is usually
more helpful.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com - Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/ - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"Osgood" <notavailable@atthisaddress.com> wrote in message
news:du1iis$d26$2@forums.macromedia.com...
> Murray *ACE* wrote:
> 
> I know what tags are munged. I can see that in DW. I just can't find the
> pairing for each tag, neithier will the validator. It will tell you there
> is an unclosed tag/s but it doesn't mean that if you close it anything
> will change.
>
> The code can be so badly manged that its like finding a needle in a
> haystack.
>
>

Murray *ACE* wrote:
 
>
>
> So, you DO use validation then? 8)

Not really. I don't usually get the yellow tags showing up in my code,
its other peoples. If they do show up, yes I know I there is something
incorrect. In a lot of cases, it doesn't help me trouble shoot because
the code is so badly shot away and I'm not implying that is good
practice when addressing validation issues, of course it's not.


> Most people who post here with those kinds of train wreck code have no clu
e
> about DW's validation.  Asking them to validate at the W3C site is usually
> more helpful.

I can't really see how it can be any easier, these yellow tags are
obviously not correct and when you see some you should take stock of the
situation before going any further.

I'm guessing a lot of people get into a mess because they NEVER look at
the code. Well I can't really be of much help in those circumstances. I
need some 'skin' left to perform a 'graft'.