The website is http://lindakuranoff.com

Someone said they saw orange with three different panels... sounds
crazy.  Let me know if there is something wrong.  TIA, Spacey.

Spacey Spade wrote:
quote:

> The website is http://lindakuranoff.com
>
> Someone said they saw orange with three different panels... sounds
> crazy.  Let me know if there is something wrong.  TIA, Spacey.


There's a red area and and brown one - bordered with white to the right and
bottom in ie6 but not in Opera or Moz

There is nothing on that page which needs tables for presentation

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com

"Spacey Spade" <spaceygum@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:1054840b.0310091009.173c8b74@posting.google.com...
quote:

> The website is http://lindakuranoff.com
>
> Someone said they saw orange with three different panels... sounds
> crazy.  Let me know if there is something wrong.  TIA, Spacey.


Since this is alt.html.critique:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...stern+Europe%29

Next, there's no tabular data on that page, so why are you using tables?


--
Karl Core

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid.
Friedrich Nietzsche

eightninethree AT eightninethree.com

"EightNineThree" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote in message news:<bm4nur$2og$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>...[QU
OTE]
> "Spacey Spade" <spaceygum@hotpop.com> wrote in message
> news:1054840b.0310091009.173c8b74@posting.google.com... 
>
> Since this is alt.html.critique:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...stern+Europe%29
>
> Next, there's no tabular data on that page, so why are you using tables?[/QUOTE]

Page can be resized pretty small w/o having to scroll.  Enlarged page
still has elements positioned as intended.  The defunct attributes are
required for best viewing in older browsers (I think).

"William Tasso" <news27@tbdata.com> wrote in message news:<bm4n3g$iocon$1@ID-139074.news.uni-berli
n.de>...
quote:

> Spacey Spade wrote: 
>
> There's a red area and and brown one - bordered with white to the right an
d
> bottom in ie6 but not in Opera or Moz
>
> There is nothing on that page which needs tables for presentation


I would like to get rid of the white areas, but don't know how in
IE5.5 or IE6 (no white areas in IE5.01sp2).  The table layout helps
keep elements relatively positioned to the size of the browser window
(unless too small, then you have to scroll).  Thanks again for the
input.  Spacey.

"Spacey Spade" <spaceygum@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:1054840b.0310100653.1271f11d@posting.google.com...
quote:

> "EightNineThree" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote in message

news:<bm4nur$2og$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>...
quote:
 
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...stern+Europe%29[QUOTE] 
>
> Page can be resized pretty small w/o having to scroll.  Enlarged page
> still has elements positioned as intended.  The defunct attributes are
> required for best viewing in older browsers (I think).


Stop making excuses.
I have sites laid out in CSS with 100% valid XHTML 1.1 Strict that display
perfectly in every version of IE4+, NN4+ and every version of Mozilla and
Opera.

--
Karl Core

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid.
Friedrich Nietzsche

eightninethree AT eightninethree.com

> I have sites laid out in CSS with 100% valid XHTML 1.1 Strict that display
quote:

> perfectly in every version of IE4+, NN4+ and every version of Mozilla and
> Opera.


What's your definition of "perfectly"?

> Exactly the same, pixel-for-pixel  (save a few minor things like font
sizes,
quote:

> etc.)


How complex are they?

Artist, the good little Microsoft drone heard "EightNineThree"
<uce@ftc.gov> say...
quote:

>
> "Spacey Spade" <spaceygui@hotpop.com> wrote in message
> news:1054840b.0310100653.1271f11d@posting.google.com... 
> news:<bm4nur$2og$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>... 
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...noff.com%2F&doc
> type=HTML+4.01+Transitional&charset=iso-8859-1+%28Western+Europe%29 
>
> Stop making excuses.
> I have sites laid out in CSS with 100% valid XHTML 1.1 Strict that
> display perfectly in every version of IE4+, NN4+ and every version of
> Mozilla and Opera.


Yeah, but that still begs the question 'why worry about it'? He presented
one workable solution to the problem.

And as for CSS with valid XHTML, could you do so, of the top of your
head?



--
AIM: GCCFurryBoy
mellorya@yahoo.com
http://www.practialdesigns.com/

"Neither hope nor fear" -- Isabella d'Este
"For to do either is to fall to the beast" -- Joseph Richmond

"e n | c k m a" <bob@marley.com> wrote in message
news:FzKhb.145891$bo1.65308@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
quote:
 
> sizes, 
>
> How complex are they?


As complex as they need to be.


--
Karl Core

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
cease to be insipid.
Friedrich Nietzsche

eightninethree AT eightninethree.com