Greetings,
Would a few please check to see if the links in the left frame work on the
following sites.
Thank you.
www.worksbyhand.comwww.gonefishingguideservice.com
If possible, list the OS and computer you are on.
Thank you for your help.
TR
tonyritter wrote:
> Would a few please check to see if the links in the left frame work
> on the following sites.
> www.worksbyhand.com
> www.gonefishingguideservice.com
> If possible, list the OS and computer you are on.
> Thank you for your help.
What do you mean with "work". I looked at the www.worksbyhand.com and see no
reason why the target pages will not open in any normal browser.
Or do you mean the Javascript-effects?
--
Nico
www.nicoschuyt.nl
In message <415c3381@news.greennet.net>, tonyritter
<tony@gonefishing_REMOVETHIS_guideservice.com> writes
>Greetings,
>Would a few please check to see if the links in the left frame work on the
>following sites.
>Thank you.
>
>www.worksbyhand.com
>
>www.gonefishingguideservice.com
>
>If possible, list the OS and computer you are on.
>Thank you for your help.
>
>TR
>
>
I'd like to, but:
"This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them."
regards,
--
Jake
jake wrote:
> In message <415c3381@news.greennet.net>, tonyritter
> <tony@gonefishing_REMOVETHIS_guideservice.com> writes
> I'd like to, but:
>
> "This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them."
Funny, I get the same thing when I browse in.
Maybe a look at:
http://www.highrankings.com/framedsite.htm
or even better:
http://www.html-faq.com/htmlframes/?framesareevil
and
> http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9612.html
There is a lot more to worry about here than every
link being good -- there are programs to do that,
anyway. Go to w3.org and use their link checking tool.
mbstevens wrote:
> jake wrote:
>
>
>
> Funny, I get the same thing when I browse in.
> Maybe a look at:
> http://www.highrankings.com/framedsite.htm
> or even better:
> http://www.html-faq.com/htmlframes/?framesareevil
> and
>
> There is a lot more to worry about here than every
> link being good -- there are programs to do that,
> anyway. Go to w3.org and use their link checking tool.
>
...a-and, here's what your navigation frame looks like
to me:
[home0202.gif] [cp0201a.gif]
[YourWish0201.gif] [df0201a.gif]
[WhoWeAre0201.gif] [pbe0201.gif]
[aa0201.gif] [sas0201a.gif]
[OInfo0201.gif] [vf0201.gif]
[ja0201.gif] [oa0201.gif]
[pgj0201.gif] [howto.gif]
[kt0201a.gif] [Links0201.gif]
[lt0201.gif] [email0201.gif]
Would *you* follow links like that?
--
mbstevens
http://www.mbstevens.com
mbstevensx wrote in message:
> Would *you* follow links like that?
> mbstevens
............
Please indicate the OS and browser you are using.
Thank you.
...............
> http://www.mbstevens.com
Purple and green?
Quoth the raven tonyritter:
> Greetings, Would a few please check to see if the links in the left
> frame work on the following sites. Thank you.
Odd. I don't see any frames... <scratch head>
> www.worksbyhand.comhttp://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...ksbyhand.com%2F
> www.gonefishingguideservice.com
[url]http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gonefishingguideservice.com%2F[
/url]
> If possible, list the OS and computer you are on.
Doesn't matter. Fix all those errors and come ask again.
Oh, ok. Win2K with a PIII. You didn't ask, but my browser is Moz 1.7.3
> Thank you for your help.
My pleasure.
--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:31:01 -0400, tonyritter
<tony@gonefishing_REMOVETHIS_guideservice.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
> Would a few please check to see if the links in the left frame work on
> the
> following sites.
> Thank you.
>
> www.worksbyhand.com
>
> www.gonefishingguideservice.com
>
> If possible, list the OS and computer you are on.
> Thank you for your help.
w98, Opera 7.23 and IE6, neither show a real left column. There is a link
at the lower left, however it is partially under the centered section.
By the way, the code is atrocious.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...ksbyhand.com%2F
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:17:27 +0100, jake <jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> PS. Err, Tony ...... what we're trying to tell you is that you need
> 'alternative text' on *all* your images .... and that you need to name
> your frames properly ..... and that you should provide a non-frames
> alternative.
>
> Still, others will tell you that you shouldn't use frames at all -- but
> I wouldn't go that far ;-)
I'm not even getting a frameset document here. Are you??