|
Convenient web based access to our favorite web design Usenet groups
|
 |
This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
| Author |
| Thread |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Re: converting HD to NTFS for CS |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
  09-20-04 - 12:14 PM
|
Waldo wrote:
> I don't fully agree with your story. FAT32 is indeed a more open system,
> readable for Win98, XP, Linux, etc. etc. and maybe slightly faster. But NT
FS
> is much safer (like EXT3 under Linux) because of the logging. After a cras
h,
> it is easy to recover files on NTFS, what is sometimes impossible with
> FAT32.
>
> So for the lockdown issue: choose NTFS or go to a Unix flavor.
>
> I've chosen FAT32 accidently for my 200 GB FireWire drive. Rendering video
's
> to that drive is impossible as they exceed easily the stupid 2 GB boundary
> of FAT32. This is not only an issue for video, but also for large scans
> (currently my biggest scan is 1.6 GB, but who knows the size in 2 or 3
> years).
>
> There are tools by the way for reading NTFS disks under DOS (ideal for a
> boot disk). Normally, my data resides on a different disk/partition than
> Window$. When Windows needs a re-install, I just re-install it and have
> access to my data again.
>
> Waldo
>
>
So obviously you have never had to send your drive air freight, halfway
round the world to on-track's Lab to have the NTFS file system unraveled
just so you can recover your client files from it and gotten a bill for
$2700?
The tools you speak of are incapable of reliably writing to NTFS, an
essencial proceedure to repairing such a file system so it can be used
to recover large files intact. but your seperate drive for OS and files
has merit. Photoshop has no ability to create a movie, this is a
Photoshop group and we shouldn't move too far off topic now, should we?
Ryadia
|
|
|
| [
Post Follow-Up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Re: converting HD to NTFS for CS |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
  09-22-04 - 04:14 PM
|
> So obviously you have never had to send your drive air freight, halfway
> round the world to on-track's Lab to have the NTFS file system unraveled
> just so you can recover your client files from it and gotten a bill for
> $2700?
Nope, but we got a EURO 9800 bill for recovering a FAT32 drive that never
leaved it's computer... Recovery is expensive, no matter the file system (as
long as it is a common format).
> The tools you speak of are incapable of reliably writing to NTFS, an
> essencial proceedure to repairing such a file system so it can be used
> to recover large files intact. but your seperate drive for OS and files
> has merit. Photoshop has no ability to create a movie, this is a
> Photoshop group and we shouldn't move too far off topic now, should we?
No, Photoshop can't make movies, but as I stated, the images are getting
bigger and bigger. Currently 1.6 GB is my maximum size of an image. One
extra layer and FAT32 does not suit anymore.
I'll stop this conversation, because you're appearantly a too fanatic
Micro$oft hater ;-)
Waldo
|
|
|
| [
Post Follow-Up to this message ]
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|  |
|