Hello,

Does anyone has experience with the Lacie Photon's? In particular the
photon19vision. I'm looking at buying a 19" LCD to hook up to my
laptop for photo editing (web and inkjet printing). I don't really
have the space for a CRT and my budget is around 500 pounds or $800
(so can't afford an Apple cinema display or Eizo ColorEdge). Any input
would be appreciated.

BTW - I'm also looking at:
NEC-Mitsubishi LCD1980SX, Iiyama ProLite E481S, Eizo L767 (bit of a
stretch)  and ViewSonic VX910 or VP191... Not sure what the difference
is between these models. I hear that the Sharp LL-T19D1 is good too.
Experience and feedback on these would be nice too.

Thanks,
Patrick

On 16 Sep 2004 07:02:02 -0700, n1patrick@hotmail.com (Patrick P.)
wrote:

 

>Thanks for all the replies.
>
>Hecate, can you please provide the link to the review. I'd like to
>have a look.

It was a UK magazine review. However, here's the summary:

"The 19" Eizo Flexscan has the most beautiful palette and a wide range
of colour temperatures and modes that allow you to find exactly what
you want. [...] Graphics professionals will relish the L768's gorgeous
colour..."

It did say the response rate was on the slow side for games players,
but that's not why you'd buy this.

>Looking at the specs the only difference I saw between the 2 models
>was the 768 has the rotate to portrait format option and a contrast
>ratio of 1000:1 as opposed to the 767 which has a contrast of 500:1
>and no rotate option. Is there anything else?

As far as I can tell.  However, the improvement from 500:1 is
significant and if you're going to spend a fair amount of money on
purchasing this it may be wise to think of the future. OTOH, it'll
probably mean you can the L767 for less. ;-)

>I'm not sure anymore what's the significance of the contrast rating.
>Eizo's best color lcd (CG18 and 21) has a contrast of 400:1. Which
>leads me to assume that it is better for this ratio of be lower. Can
>anyone explain how this works?

Actually, no. The higher the ratio the better:

The Contrast Ratio is equivalent to the brightness of the white level
divided by the brightness of the black level of a display. A higher
contrast ratio makes it easier to distinguish dark colours from one
another.

So, the higher ratio gives you better colour separation and
definition.

Hope that helps.

--

Hecate - The Real One
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui

I use a 19" la cie photon lcd for photography...I have  nikon and pentax 5
mp cameras and shoot either highest jpeg or raw...use photoshop CS on a mac
g4  and use the analog connection of the monitor with a win xp
machine...have both an epson 2200 and  olympus p400 for prints....am very
satisfied with the lacie monitor with this set up.  I am able to produce
prints that are very close to the monitor using epson and third party
profiles.


"Bill Crocker" <wcrocker007@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:dZydndhXq98M-NrcRVn-pg@comcast.com...
> Lacie's are manufactured by Mitsubishi.  A co-worker had a Lacie 22", that
> he loved!  He later sold it to me when he went to a flat LCD.  I also
really
> like the Lacie 22".  Later, he decided CRT's were better for photography,
> and bought another Lacie.  Only this time is was a 19".  He hated it, send
> it back the very next day.  Go figure?
>
> Bill Crocker
>
>
> "Patrick P." <n1patrick@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9d77ae76.0409141041.880365f@posting.google.com... 
>
>

Why to buy 19" because all the 17" has the same resolution, i would buy
better 17"


"Patrick P." <n1patrick@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9d77ae76.0409141041.880365f@posting.google.com...
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone has experience with the Lacie Photon's? In particular the
> photon19vision. I'm looking at buying a 19" LCD to hook up to my
> laptop for photo editing (web and inkjet printing). I don't really
> have the space for a CRT and my budget is around 500 pounds or $800
> (so can't afford an Apple cinema display or Eizo ColorEdge). Any input
> would be appreciated.
>
> BTW - I'm also looking at:
> NEC-Mitsubishi LCD1980SX, Iiyama ProLite E481S, Eizo L767 (bit of a
> stretch)  and ViewSonic VX910 or VP191... Not sure what the difference
> is between these models. I hear that the Sharp LL-T19D1 is good too.
> Experience and feedback on these would be nice too.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick

On 16 Sep 2004 07:02:02 -0700, n1patrick@hotmail.com (Patrick P.)
wrote:

 

>Thanks for all the replies.
>
>Hecate, can you please provide the link to the review. I'd like to
>have a look.

It was a UK magazine review. However, here's the summary:

"The 19" Eizo Flexscan has the most beautiful palette and a wide range
of colour temperatures and modes that allow you to find exactly what
you want. [...] Graphics professionals will relish the L768's gorgeous
colour..."

It did say the response rate was on the slow side for games players,
but that's not why you'd buy this.

>Looking at the specs the only difference I saw between the 2 models
>was the 768 has the rotate to portrait format option and a contrast
>ratio of 1000:1 as opposed to the 767 which has a contrast of 500:1
>and no rotate option. Is there anything else?

As far as I can tell.  However, the improvement from 500:1 is
significant and if you're going to spend a fair amount of money on
purchasing this it may be wise to think of the future. OTOH, it'll
probably mean you can the L767 for less. ;-)

>I'm not sure anymore what's the significance of the contrast rating.
>Eizo's best color lcd (CG18 and 21) has a contrast of 400:1. Which
>leads me to assume that it is better for this ratio of be lower. Can
>anyone explain how this works?

Actually, no. The higher the ratio the better:

The Contrast Ratio is equivalent to the brightness of the white level
divided by the brightness of the black level of a display. A higher
contrast ratio makes it easier to distinguish dark colours from one
another.

So, the higher ratio gives you better colour separation and
definition.

Hope that helps.

--

Hecate - The Real One
Hecate@newsguy.com
veni, vidi, reliqui