|
|
| Adriaan Barel 2006-06-27, 9:07 pm |
| underprocessable | |
| Joëlle 2006-06-27, 9:07 pm |
| underprocessable | |
| Spandex Rutabaga 2006-06-27, 9:07 pm |
| "Joëlle" wrote:
> Your pan will slide off that table Adriaan, unless it's glued to it :-)
> To stop it, you need to correct the perspective. Something like the attached
> would make any object less likely to slide off.
Alternatively, you can leave the table alone and apply the
relevant perspective to the window to make it clear that the
view is downwards from a position above the table.
While you are about it, it is desirable to give the scene
outside the same contrast and high saturation as has been
applied to the interior. One can try and match the interior
sharpness too but really you need a larger image to place
into the window aperture so it has more detail crammed into
it.
| |
|
|
Joëlle wrote:
> "Adriaan Barel" wrote
[color=darkred]
> Your pan will slide off that table Adriaan, unless
> it's glued to it :-)
I don't think so.
This is a top view and there is nothing wrong with it. What
needs to be corrected in this case is the window to match the
table's perspective. A view from the top would make the window wider
at the top and narrower at the bottom.
> To stop it, you need to correct the perspective.
> You can do this using the Deform Tool.
> As the saying goes: 'Practice makes perfect'!
> :-)
Joske
--
http://members.home.nl/j.a.c.backer/
The Sultan's Elephant, Giant Girl walking London:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBXr15K2uSc
| |
| Adriaan Barel 2006-06-27, 9:07 pm |
|
"Spandex Rutabaga" <SpRu@agabatur.xednaps> wrote in message
news:449D9D20.4C0E4EAA@agabatur.xednaps
> "Joëlle" wrote:
>
>
> Alternatively, you can leave the table alone and apply the
> relevant perspective to the window to make it clear that the
> view is downwards from a position above the table.
>
> While you are about it, it is desirable to give the scene
> outside the same contrast and high saturation as has been
> applied to the interior. One can try and match the interior
> sharpness too but really you need a larger image to place
> into the window aperture so it has more detail crammed into
> it.
I like what you did to the window frame, very much. I made the image in the
window pale to give the impression of looking through glass but suppose I
wasn't very successful.
Thanks for your interest and comments. :-)
--
----oooOOOooo----
Adriaan Barel
| |
| Adriaan Barel 2006-06-27, 9:07 pm |
|
"Joske" <j.backer@home.nl> wrote in message news:449d9c28$1_1@cnews
> Joëlle wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't think so.
>
> This is a top view and there is nothing wrong with it. What
> needs to be corrected in this case is the window to match the
> table's perspective. A view from the top would make the window wider
> at the top and narrower at the bottom.
>
>
>
>
> Joske
Right you are Joske, see what Spandex did. :-)
--
----oooOOOooo----
Adriaan Barel
| |
| Adriaan Barel 2006-06-27, 9:07 pm |
|
"Joëlle" <funfunfun@anytime.now> wrote in message news:449d93eb_1@cnews
> "Adriaan Barel" <apbarel@REMOVEbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:449d8b53_2@cnews...
>
> Your pan will slide off that table Adriaan, unless it's glued to it
> :-) To stop it, you need to correct the perspective. Something like the
> attached would make any object less likely to slide off.
> You can do this using the Deform Tool. Select the table top only,
> using the Rectangular Selection tool. Copy & Paste it as a New Image
> and then deform the shape until it looks level.
> Of course the background will need to be the same colour as the
> surroundings. So you need to do a bit of work on that.
> Once done, just paste you new level tabletop back into the image.
>
> As the saying goes: 'Practice makes perfect'!
>
> :-)
> Joëlle
Thanks Joëlle. I like what Spandex did better. :-)
--
----oooOOOooo----
Adriaan Barel
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2009 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |