PainShop Pro Graphics - Kate pspimage 400kB - free poser model to play with

Author

Kate pspimage 400kB - free poser model to play with

Joske

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

underprocessable

Adriaan Barel

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

"Joske" <j.backer@home.nl> wrote in message news:448ed8a9_3@cnews
> Adriaan, thank you for sending me little miss Kate. I have dressed
> her just enough to make sure no sensibilities will be compromised
> :-)
>
> As you can see, and I didn't know of course until actually having a
> Poser figure at my disposal, there are partially transparent areas
> left around a model. So her background will either have to be very
> mixed (pixelated, varied), or light as the bottom part of the one I
> put her on.
>
> I did a histogram adjustment on the original by the way because I
> thought it was very dark. But I changed nothing else (yet) on the
> model. The top and thingie are painted and worked on with
> Lighten/Darken and Burn/Unburn. They are on their own layers.
>
> Now Kate, she is just a girl (I won't remark on certain parts that
> were a little too high on her body, grin). So I could never dress
> her in lavish clothes - we need a full-blown (sorry, fully grown)
> lady for that. Maybe others here would be interested in a dress up
> party challenge as well, I don't know.
>
> But thank you for sending her. I will work on her (and a setting,
> backdrop) when I have time, it should be fun.
>
> Joske

Hi Joske; on all the figures I submitted to this group I painstakeingly
erased those "partially transparent" areas, very time consumming it was too
and any areas I still wasn't happy with I ran the soften brush over them.
Poser has three light sources so I put two at the back of the figure and one
at the front; I didn't want any light comming from the side as I didn't know
what you were going to do.

I'd be happy to send you a model of a fully grown/adult man or woman. Just
let me know.

Regards,

----oooOOOooo----

Adriaan Barel

McGrandpa

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

"Adriaan Barel" <apbarel@REMOVEbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:448f4442_3@cnews...
>
> "Joske" <j.backer@home.nl> wrote in message news:448ed8a9_3@cnews
>
> Hi Joske; on all the figures I submitted to this group I painstakeingly
> erased those "partially transparent" areas, very time consumming it was
> too and any areas I still wasn't happy with I ran the soften brush over
> them. Poser has three light sources so I put two at the back of the figure
> and one

The default setting starts off with 3 lights, you can remove and add lights
and individual paramaters for each, change any of them around. It's one of
Posers proudest features, actually.

> at the front; I didn't want any light comming from the side as I didn't
> know what you were going to do.
>
> I'd be happy to send you a model of a fully grown/adult man or woman. Just
> let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> ----oooOOOooo----
>
> Adriaan Barel
>
>

Adriaan Barel

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

"McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote in message
news:448f720e$1_1@cnews[color=darkred]
> "Adriaan Barel" <apbarel@REMOVEbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:448f4442_3@cnews...
>
> The default setting starts off with 3 lights, you can remove and add
> lights and individual paramaters for each, change any of them around.
> It's one of Posers proudest features, actually.
>

Thanks McG, I'll look into it.

--
----oooOOOooo----

Adriaan Barel

Adriaan Barel

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

underprocessable

Adriaan Barel

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

"Adriaan Barel" <apbarel@REMOVEbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:448f7d5d_1@cnews
> "Joske" <j.backer@home.nl> wrote in message news:448ed8a9_3@cnews
>
> Attached is a JPEG image of Joske's Kate. I took out the
> "partially transparent area left around the model" although I don't
> think they are trasparent at all. I think they are artifacts left by
> using the magic wand selection tool.

Looking at Kate now I think I did a terrible job of removing the artifacts.
I would need to spend more time on it. :-(

--
----oooOOOooo----

Adriaan Barel

Joske

2006-06-27, 9:05 pm

Adriaan Barel wrote:
> "Adriaan Barel" wrote
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
> Looking at Kate now I think I did a terrible job of removing the
> artifacts. I would need to spend more time on it. :-(

I may have been wrong about the leftovers being from partial
transparency, I admit I did not look closely. If I knew anything
about the programs you and RonV and McGrandpa are using, I'd know
how you create a figure on transparency. It sounds like you
extracted Kate from an opaque background initially after all? That
is hard work, and no matter what one does, there is the choice of
deleting based on a new dark or light background.

As you say, it always needs to be spent more time on... not one of
my favorite pastimes either :-)

Please don't worry about those artifacts on my behalf, Adriaan. It
was very nice of you to send me Kate, and I have already drawn some
things on her (will do more and post when I have more time). The
trick is in making the viewer overlook any leftovers with a fitting
background :-) Clothes of course will cover most of it anyway.

The good thing is, she is now fit to post (although I cannot find a
single word in the TOS about natural nudity not being allowed). Any
other, more adult models, you care to send me, will definitely not
go here without at least a loincloth :-)

Thanks Adriaan,

Joske
--
http://members.home.nl/j.a.c.backer/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJg-aowdgko
oh dear... now i'll get banned after all :-)