PainShop Pro Graphics - A Wash Stand

Author

A Wash Stand

David Gray

2006-05-22, 11:00 pm

underprocessable

JoeB

2006-05-22, 11:01 pm

"David Gray" <kadamar@zeuter.com> wrote in news:44726bd4_1@cnews:

>

I really like this. I'm prejudiced, however, 'cause I like period
pieces. It really is attractive, and I'm assumign it's from your
experimenting with VP5. Any chance of seeing the original?

Regards,

JoeB

Gene Healy

2006-05-22, 11:01 pm

On Mon, 22 May 2006 21:57:19 -0400, "David Gray" <kadamar@zeuter.com>
wrote:

This one is amazing, David. It is a personal opinion only, but I
prefer this 1000% percent over the one in Buzz.

Is this VP5 an expensive plug-in?

Regards,

-- Gene
=========================================
Comments, critiques, and suggestions are always
welcomed and encouraged.
---------------------------------------
All post processing done in Paintshop Pro v9.01
=========================================
My photo galleries are at http://ghealy.smugmug.com
=========================================

Nightingail

2006-05-23, 4:25 am

Gene Healy wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006 21:57:19 -0400, "David Gray" <kadamar@zeuter.com>
> wrote:
>
> This one is amazing, David. It is a personal opinion only, but I
> prefer this 1000% percent over the one in Buzz.
>
> Is this VP5 an expensive plug-in?
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Gene
> =========================================
> Comments, critiques, and suggestions are always
> welcomed and encouraged.
> ---------------------------------------
> All post processing done in Paintshop Pro v9.01
> =========================================
> My photo galleries are at http://ghealy.smugmug.com
> =========================================

I like this one manipulation a lot David. Gene, here's all the info about
it. There are three versions: plugin, standalone, deluxe (contains both),
and the price depends on which version you buy, as well as whether you're
upgrading an old version or purchasing new. The specifics are here,
including prices and version comparisons:
http://www.virtualpainter5.com/vp5index.html
I've been trying the demo, too. Looks like quite an improvement in rendering
quality compared to v4.

Gail

--
Nightingail's Gallery
www.nightingail.com

David Gray

2006-05-23, 7:16 am

.....the plugin cost me 30$ because it was an upgrade....otherwise, it is
$55.You can download the trial version which allows you to use it 32 times.

David
"Gene Healy" <healysmg@remove.this.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pbu472t70i1u1vmggcd4rpm0lvjvu3leqh@4ax.com...
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2006 21:57:19 -0400, "David Gray" <kadamar@zeuter.com>
> wrote:
>
> This one is amazing, David. It is a personal opinion only, but I
> prefer this 1000% percent over the one in Buzz.
>
> Is this VP5 an expensive plug-in?
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Gene
> =========================================
> Comments, critiques, and suggestions are always
> welcomed and encouraged.
> ---------------------------------------
> All post processing done in Paintshop Pro v9.01
> =========================================
> My photo galleries are at http://ghealy.smugmug.com
> =========================================
>

David Gray

2006-05-23, 7:16 am

underprocessable

JoeB

2006-05-23, 7:03 pm

"David Gray" <kadamar@zeuter.com> wrote in news:4472e1af_3@cnews:

>
> ...thanks Joe...here is the original...have fun playing with it.
>
> David

Thanks David. I have an older version of VP and was curious as to
how it would work on this image. I'll fool around with it when I
get time.

Regards,

JoeB

Maureen

2006-05-23, 7:03 pm

Great image to play with :)

Regards,
Maureen

David Gray wrote:
> ...thanks Joe...here is the original...have fun playing with it.
>
> David
> "JoeB" <myemail@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97CBD55075B1DJoeB@216.191.232.194...
>
>

Joëlle

2006-05-23, 7:03 pm

"Maureen" <user@supressed.email> wrote in message news:447354d4_1@cnews...
> Great image to play with :)
>
> Regards,
> Maureen
>
>
>
> David Gray wrote:
>

Very Victorian! Well done.
:-)
Joëlle

Maureen

2006-05-23, 7:03 pm

Thanks Jo=EBlle :)

Regards,
Maureen

Jo=EBlle wrote:
> "Maureen" <user@supressed.email> wrote in message news:447354d4_1@cnews=
....
>=20
> Very Victorian! Well done.
> :-)
> Jo=EBlle=20
>=20
>=20
>=20

Gene Healy

2006-05-24, 7:05 am

On Mon, 22 May 2006 22:56:10 -0400, Gene Healy
<healysmg@remove.this.hotmail.com> wrote:

Thanks to both Gail & David for their quick replies.

Regards,

-- Gene
=========================================
Comments, critiques, and suggestions are always
welcomed and encouraged.
---------------------------------------
All post processing done in Paintshop Pro v9.01
=========================================
My photo galleries are at http://ghealy.smugmug.com
=========================================

Carrie Osmo

2006-05-25, 7:11 am

David
stunning treatment - generous of you to share the image..
and most inspiring to see the assorted outcomes which
the other talented participants here have accomplished,
much enjoyed everyone's work :o)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
and the explanations have given me new avenues to explore
This and related threads are like a box of chocolates ;o)
thanks
carrie
"David Gray" <kadamar@zeuter.com> wrote in message news:44726bd4_1@cnews...
>
>
>
>