This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters  


Home > Archive > Website Design Forum > February 2006 > Re: Philosophy question about media websites/video feeds





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Philosophy question about media websites/video feeds
Eric Lindsay

2006-02-24, 10:27 am

In article <1140395686.765222.320560@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
intrepid_dw@hotmail.com wrote:

> I'm a developer, and as I browse other "large" commercial/media
> websites, I'm observing an increasing trend toward forcing a
> video/audio stream just for hitting a site's homepage.


I thought perhaps I was the only person annoyed by this. However I have
switched plugins off, so I don't encounter video or audio a lot. Of
course, some sites don't seem to work, so I go to the next site on my
list.

--
http://www.ericlindsay.com
Michael Stemper

2006-02-24, 10:27 am

In article <1140395686.765222.320560@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, intrepid_dw writes:
[disclaimer: I'm not a pro, I just tinker around a bit with some vanity pages]

>I'm a developer, and as I browse other "large" commercial/media
>websites, I'm observing an increasing trend toward forcing a
>video/audio stream just for hitting a site's homepage.


"Attempting to force" would be a better way to put it. I surf from a
dial-up line. Hence, I don't have (or want) any plugins that support
this sort of thing.

If somebody points me to a page that consists of nothing but Flash
or a movie or something, I just close that tab in my browser.

> ESPN is big on
>this - you used to have to download a separate item for it.


This might actually be reasonable -- for them. After all, they are
a television company. If they want to use TCP/IP to deliver that
kind of content (to others who are expecting it), that's fine.

On the other hand, if you also have to view the movie in order to
sign up for their service, that would be a really stupid business
decision. Would they really want to say "unless your computer has
Mb/s connectivity, we don't want your money"?

> I find it highly
>annoying, and as a developer I wouldn't try to foist that on one of my
>site's viewers.


Thank you.

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
Always use apostrophe's and "quotation marks" properly.

Nigel

2006-02-24, 10:27 am

intrepid_dw@hotmail.com wrote:
> All:
>
> First, let me apologize if this isn't considered the proper place for
> this post, but this is the closest group I could find that seems to
> have a relationship to the question I'd like to ask.
>
> I'm a developer, and as I browse other "large" commercial/media
> websites, I'm observing an increasing trend toward forcing a
> video/audio stream just for hitting a site's homepage. ESPN is big on
> this - you used to have to download a separate item for it. Now it
> starts automatically whether you want it or not. Even some local TV
> station homepages are starting this practice. I find it highly
> annoying, and as a developer I wouldn't try to foist that on one of my
> site's viewers.
>
> What's the general opinion of those here about this? I think its a)
> incredibly rude and presumptuous, and b) a waste of bandwidth. I've
> heard some webmasters are being told that this is the wave of the
> future, and I think that's nonsense.
>
> I've encountered a few other comments/blogs/whatever on this, and it
> may have been discussed here previously - if so, my apologies. What
> I've found so far seems to agree that its a frowned-upon (or at least
> disliked) practice; one such example is
> http://thedavechronicles.blogspot.com
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> -intrepid
>
> pls reply to group; email here is dead.
>


Part of the problem is that companies don't understand the web and its
uses properly. In many cases, web development is financed by the
marketing department and their expertise lies in flashy advertising
campaigns, so they insist the company website should have lots of 'sexy'
multimedia experiences.

Companies like Amazon (spit, but I admire their business model) have
realised that the company website should be part of the sales department
and therefore the focus should be on helping customers to purchase what
they want with the minimum of time and effort.

Would you shop in Tescos if you had to wait an extra 5 minutes in the
checkout queue to watch an advertising video?

NigelH

Sponsored Links


Copyright 2003 - 2009 forum4designers.com  Software forum  Computer Hardware reviews