| Author |
Need opinion on design of this site...
|
|
|
|
| Brendan Gillatt 2006-12-06, 8:05 pm |
| Gater wrote:
> http://www.wrestlerratings.34sp.com/index.php
>
> Thanks,
>
>
It's certainly an improvement on you're old style.
I would loose the background image - it's a bit straining on the eyes.
You also use a few formating tags such as <B> which are depreciated in
favor of CSS (as well as being upper-case). Use a <span> tag with
appropriate formatting.
--
| Brendan Gillatt |
| brendan {at} brendan \removethis// gillatt {dot} co {dot} uk |
| http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk |
| PGP Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E265E61|
| |
| Spartanicus 2006-12-06, 8:05 pm |
| Brendan Gillatt <brendan@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
>You also use a few formating tags such as <B> which are depreciated in
>favor of CSS (as well as being upper-case).
Maybe you no longer "appreciate" the <b> element, I can assure you that
it has not been *deprecated*. There are instances where using the
element is perfectly appropriate.
>Use a <span> tag with
>appropriate formatting.
Which, contrary to use of the <b> element, is rarely a good solution.
--
Spartanicus
| |
| Brendan Gillatt 2006-12-06, 8:05 pm |
| Spartanicus wrote:
> Brendan Gillatt <brendan@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Maybe you no longer "appreciate" the <b> element, I can assure you that
> it has not been *deprecated*. There are instances where using the
> element is perfectly appropriate.
>
>
> Which, contrary to use of the <b> element, is rarely a good solution.
>
Sorry if I was wrong but I was under the impression it was - meh. I
thought the idea was to off load the presentation of the document to CSS.
--
| Brendan Gillatt |
| brendan {at} brendan \removethis// gillatt {dot} co {dot} uk |
| http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk |
| PGP Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E265E61|
| |
| Spartanicus 2006-12-06, 8:05 pm |
| Brendan Gillatt <brendan@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote:
>
>Sorry if I was wrong but I was under the impression it was - meh. I
>thought the idea was to off load the presentation of the document to CSS.
It is, but there is also the need for a document to work without CSS.
Occasionally the visual representation of a document rendered sans CSS
can be improved by using the <b> element around content which cannot
justifiably be marked up as a header or as having emphasis, this can
justify using the <b> element with content.
Then there are situations where an empty hook in the HTML is needed to
attach styling properties to, for that purpose there is nothing wrong
with using <b></b> or <i></i> instead of <span></span> or <div></div>.
Finally <span class="foo">foo</span> with .foo{font-weight:bold} is no
less presentational markup than <b>foo</b>, it just wastes more bits.
--
Spartanicus
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2009 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |