This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Multimedia support forum > January 2006 > WMA vs AAC
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| sigrem 2006-01-09, 6:23 am |
| Hi All,
Regarding compression efficiency, which audio encoder results in
smaller file size with almost the same quality, wma or aac? How about
wma pro+ vs. aac+ v2? Would appreciate if somebody could refer me to
test results/articles/etc.
Thanks
sigrem
| |
| Heiko Recktenwald 2006-01-11, 3:53 am |
| sigrem wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Regarding compression efficiency, which audio encoder results in
> smaller file size with almost the same quality, wma or aac? How about
> wma pro+ vs. aac+ v2? Would appreciate if somebody could refer me to
> test results/articles/etc.
>
> Thanks
> sigrem
>
I have made no tests with Windows audio, but in a commentary in German
national public radio on Bill Gates latest ideas it was said, that mp3
is half the size of wma and, as we all know, aac is better than mp3,it
can do, btw, DRM as well.
H.
http://mpegurl.blog.de
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2009 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|