This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Paint Shop Pro support > September 2004 > artist?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Ex-Republican 2004-09-22, 7:23 pm |
| i visited this artistmike web site and have determined that this person has
no artistic ability whatsoever. i also think he/she/it is a faggot.
| |
|
|
"Ex-Republican" <not@gop.com> wrote in message
news:2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de...
> i visited this artistmike web site and have determined that this person
has
> no artistic ability whatsoever. i also think he/she/it is a faggot.
Sheesh, you're right on both counts! How'd you figure that out?
Check out some more of my great quotes.... I gotta say, I have lots of
fun!!!!
Here are some of my Uni Posts: http://tinyurl.com/4rg8p
And still more... http://tinyurl.com/6o8b3
:-)
Uni aka FakeArtistMike, Danhiel, MinorityOpinion, TrueOne, MartinS, JP,
Charlie Tuna, JP232
ps: Does it seem like I have a problem since I have so many aliases? Or is
okay Tanya, sweetie pie?
| |
| Combaticus 2004-09-22, 7:23 pm |
| in article 2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de, Ex-Republican at not@gop.com wrote
on 09/21/2004 10:44 PM:
> i visited this http://www.artistmike.com web site and have determined that
> this person has great artistic ability.
What did you expect?
| |
| Combaticus 2004-09-22, 7:23 pm |
| in article it84d.24170$UY1.13980@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com, Uni at
no.email@no.email.invalid wrote on 09/21/2004 10:55 PM:
> Sheesh, you're right on both counts! http://www.artistmike.com is a great
> site! And ArtistMike is a real man!
I am sure he will be happy to know you think that.
| |
|
|
"Ex-Republican" <not@gop.com> wrote in message
news:2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de...
> i visited this artistmike web site and have determined that this person
has
> no artistic ability whatsoever. i also think he/she/it is a faggot.
Sheesh, you're right on both counts! How'd you figure that out?
Check out some more of my great quotes.... I gotta say, I have lots of
fun!!!!
Here are some of my Uni Posts: http://tinyurl.com/4rg8p
And still more... http://tinyurl.com/6o8b3
:-)
Uni aka FakeArtistMike, Danhiel, MinorityOpinion, TrueOne, MartinS, JP,
Charlie Tuna, JP232
ps: Does it seem like I have a problem since I have so many aliases? Or is
okay Tanya, sweetie pie?
"Combaticus" <combaticus@combiworld.com> wrote in message
news:BD7664BC.129501%combaticus@combiworld.com...
> in article 2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de, Ex-Republican at not@gop.com
wrote
> on 09/21/2004 10:44 PM:
>
determined that[color=darkred]
>
>
>
> What did you expect?
>
Come on Combaticus, you're just trying to flatter me. "Ex-Republican" hit
the nail on the head, and I want to come clean. He's right, I don't have
any artistic ability - I'll be the first to admit it. And he's a good judge
of character or lack thereof, which is where I fit in, if you know what I
mean. Btw, why does everyone "killfile" me. I mean, is it just because
I'm a troll???
| |
| LindaN 2004-09-22, 7:23 pm |
| "Ex-Republican" <not@gop.com> wrote in message
news:2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de...
>i visited this artistmike web site and have determined that this person has
>no artistic ability whatsoever.
Where can your artwork be seen?
Graphic art is subjective so to each their own. I think the toon type
characters and typeface on that site is very well done. The best I've seen
for toon type drawing is by far from the 'Wizard of Draws' himself, Jeff
Bucchino, http://www.wizardofdraws.com.
Take care,
Linda
| |
| Ex-Republican 2004-09-22, 7:23 pm |
| "LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote in message
news:p_f4d.2572$KF.20468@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
> "Ex-Republican" <not@gop.com> wrote in message
> news:2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> Where can your artwork be seen?
huh? me? art?
what do i look like, some kinda poofta boy?
>
> Graphic art is subjective so to each their own. I think the toon type
> characters and typeface on that site is very well done. The best I've seen
> for toon type drawing is by far from the 'Wizard of Draws' himself, Jeff
> Bucchino, http://www.wizardofdraws.com.
>
> Take care,
> Linda
>
| |
| T a n y a 2004-09-23, 12:19 pm |
| He's just a logo designer...
If you wanna talk artists... look up people such as Linda Berkgvist, Amy Brown. Just a couple of my favourite artists,
but there are millions out there and everyone has their own opinion about their favourite artist.
Though.. I do agree with you that this cartoon drawer is quite talented! But he's not a logo designer... and THAT'S what
we're actually talking about here! Thus... the question mark (?) at the end of artist in the subject field when talking
about "Mike"!
Mike... as he likes to call himself... though some would like to call him an artist... actually likes to use other
peoples ideas to make his graphics look good! He takes logo's from such examples as Jeff Bucchino ('Wizard of Draws')...
not particularly this artist.. but such as him, and then just add text and poorly made text effects. Anyone can do that!
It's quite a stress reliever if I do say so myself... though I don't make a penny for stealing other peoples ideas and
logos... I do it for fun and to create my own personal website, that's all.. and give proper credit when doing so
whenever I can... Unlike "Mike" the stealing logo designer here...
My 5 cents... Keep the change! :)
--
Cheers,
- T a n y a
"LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote in message news:p_f4d.2572$KF.20468@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
"Ex-Republican" <not@gop.com> wrote in message
news:2rchq3F17os9bU1@uni-berlin.de...
>i visited this artistmike web site and have determined that this person has
>no artistic ability whatsoever.
Where can your artwork be seen?
Graphic art is subjective so to each their own. I think the toon type
characters and typeface on that site is very well done. The best I've seen
for toon type drawing is by far from the 'Wizard of Draws' himself, Jeff
Bucchino, http://www.wizardofdraws.com.
Take care,
Linda
| |
| Combaticus 2004-09-23, 12:19 pm |
| in article 10l4fp02cv9djbc@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/22/2004 8:12 PM:
> He's just a logo designer...
Poor little Tanya, can't even design a logo.
| |
| Combaticus 2004-09-23, 12:19 pm |
|
"Combaticus" <combaticus@combiworld.com> wrote in message
news:BD77A3F1.129E28%combaticus@combiworld.com...
> in article 10l4fp02cv9djbc@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
> tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/22/2004 8:12 PM:
>
>
>
> Poor little Tanya, can't even design a logo.
>
Uni you poor little baby. Did T a n y a spank you a little too hard?
hahaha So you want to come out and use my great name "Combaticus"... well
go ahead little guy... Everyone here knows you use my name from time to
time when you get a little upset. And don't worry, we understand why you're
feeling less than adequate. Because someone said you weren't "all that"!
hahaha The rest of already knew that. It took T a n y a a few days
to figure out what a shmuck you are. hahahahaha.
Well for those that don't know Uni: aka Danhiel, MartinS, FakeArtistMike,
JP, TheOne, MinorityOpinion, JP232 --- doesn't he sound like a pathetic
troll? And sometimes he uses my name, "Combaticus" when he's real
desperate, like he did above.
Take a look at our little "artist" Uni... On the link below, you'll see some
of his other aliases referred to above. Don't worry, it's the same troll.
http://tinyurl.com/62yte This will give you a nice picture of what Uni is
all about. After that, I'm sure you'll "killfile" him like virtually
everyone else does on this forum.
":^) ®
Combaticus
PS: Just consider this a "Public Service Announcement".
| |
| T a n y a 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| What? Couldn't you read the rest?
"I do it for fun and to create my own personal website, that's all.. and give proper credit when doing so
whenever I can... Unlike "Mike" the stealing logo designer here..."
You missed that part...
If I couldn't design a simple logo... I don't think I'd be ranting on and on
and making a fool of myself if I didn't know what I was talking about!
--
Cheers,
- T a n y a
"Combaticus" <combaticus@combiworld.com> wrote in message news:BD77A3F1.129E28%combaticus@combiworld.com...
in article 10l4fp02cv9djbc@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/22/2004 8:12 PM:
> He's just a logo designer...
Poor little Tanya, can't even design a logo.
| |
| Voivoid 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| in article 10l5ucs6227pfe1@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/23/2004 9:28 AM:
> What? Couldn't you read the rest?
>
> "I do it for fun and to create my own personal website, that's all.. and give
> proper credit when doing so
> whenever I can... Unlike "Mike" the stealing logo designer here..."
>
> You missed that part...
>
> If I couldn't design a simple logo... I don't think I'd be ranting on and on
> and making a fool of myself if I didn't know what I was talking about!
>
Blah Blah Blah
| |
| Chris Hughes 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| In message <BD7851EC.12A538%VVoid@void.com>, Voivoid <VVoid@void.com>
writes
>in article 10l5ucs6227pfe1@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
>tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/23/2004 9:28 AM:
>
>
>
>
>Blah Blah Blah
>
Go fiddle with your Mac, Mike...
--
Chris Hughes
"I intend to live for ever. So far, so good..."
http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
| |
| T a n y a 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| Is that who it is. LOL
Chicken shits can't reply with just
one name... have to make multiple ones
to try and hide their real "identities".
How childish. LOL
--
Cheers,
- T a n y a
"Chris Hughes" <chris.hughes@epicure.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:+8JMShHyDxUBFwqH@epicure.demon.co.uk...
In message <BD7851EC.12A538%VVoid@void.com>, Voivoid <VVoid@void.com>
writes
>in article 10l5ucs6227pfe1@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
>tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/23/2004 9:28 AM:
>
>
>
>
>Blah Blah Blah
>
Go fiddle with your Mac, Mike...
--
Chris Hughes
"I intend to live for ever. So far, so good..."
http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
| |
| Carol J 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| in article 10l65r47pd2eo3b@corp.supernews.com, T a n y a at
tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com wrote on 09/23/2004 11:34 AM:
> Is that who it is.
You are so easy.
| |
| Chris Hughes 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| In message <BD7867AF.12A77E%biteme@kissmya**.com>, Carol J
<biteme@kissmya**.com> writes
>
>
>You are so easy.
And you are such an exemplar of the Ugly American...
--
Chris Hughes
"Man is the only animal that has the true religion — several of them." (Mark Twain)
http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
| |
| Combaticus 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| Hey, this guy Uni/Fake Artist Mike, Danhiel, MartinS, Voivoid,
MinorityOpinion, TheOne, and now CarolJ (hahahaha Uni you sure are
desperate!!!) is such a punk, but is only an American by where he lives.
It's a shame there are so many good people doing good things worldwide, and
then you have people that are just pitiful, pathetic punks like Uni He
hides behind his computer, and hides behind his countless aliases - you'd
think he'd have a mission or purpose to do some good, but no he's just a
sorrowful punk, pervert, troll. Even his 80 year old mother calls his,
"Loser".
Newbies read the following links to get an idea of his wonderful "talent".
Then you'll undoubtedly killfile this pathetic pervert...
Here are some of Uni's Posts: http://tinyurl.com/4rg8p
And still more... http://tinyurl.com/6o8b3
":^) ®
Combaticus
PS: Consider this a Public Service Announcement
"Chris Hughes" <chris.hughes@epicure.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hszL2fIbjyUBFwZI@epicure.demon.co.uk...
> In message <BD7867AF.12A77E%biteme@kissmya**.com>, Carol J
> <biteme@kissmya**.com> writes
>
> And you are such an exemplar of the Ugly American...
> --
> Chris Hughes
> "Man is the only animal that has the true religion - several of them."
(Mark Twain)
> http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
| |
| T a n y a 2004-09-24, 12:22 pm |
| Holy crap. Do you also have nothing to do but keep track
of this so called Uni guy and all his aliases?
Let's keep it to a good fun, interesting and helpful
graphic / PSP newsgroup, please!
I agree.. some people really need a slap in the face...
but it ain't gonna happen with text, in a newsgroup,
with insults! Your just making them happy they
got to ya!
--
Cheers,
- T a n y a
"Combaticus" <combaticus@combiworld.com> wrote in message news:J9H4d.1653$nj.1073@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
Hey, this guy Uni/Fake Artist Mike, Danhiel, MartinS, Voivoid,
MinorityOpinion, TheOne, and now CarolJ (hahahaha Uni you sure are
desperate!!!) is such a punk, but is only an American by where he lives.
It's a shame there are so many good people doing good things worldwide, and
then you have people that are just pitiful, pathetic punks like Uni He
hides behind his computer, and hides behind his countless aliases - you'd
think he'd have a mission or purpose to do some good, but no he's just a
sorrowful punk, pervert, troll. Even his 80 year old mother calls his,
"Loser".
Newbies read the following links to get an idea of his wonderful "talent".
Then you'll undoubtedly killfile this pathetic pervert...
Here are some of Uni's Posts: http://tinyurl.com/4rg8p
And still more... http://tinyurl.com/6o8b3
":^) ®
Combaticus
PS: Consider this a Public Service Announcement
"Chris Hughes" <chris.hughes@epicure.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hszL2fIbjyUBFwZI@epicure.demon.co.uk...
> In message <BD7867AF.12A77E%biteme@kissmya**.com>, Carol J
> <biteme@kissmya**.com> writes
>
> And you are such an exemplar of the Ugly American...
> --
> Chris Hughes
> "Man is the only animal that has the true religion - several of them."
(Mark Twain)
> http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
| |
|
|
You are such a good little groupie.
in article J9H4d.1653$nj.1073@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com, Combaticus at
combaticus@combiworld.com wrote on 09/23/2004 2:23 PM:
> Hey, this guy Uni/Fake Artist Mike, Danhiel, MartinS, Voivoid,
> MinorityOpinion, TheOne, and now CarolJ (hahahaha Uni you sure are
> desperate!!!) is such a punk, but is only an American by where he lives.
> It's a shame there are so many good people doing good things worldwide, and
> then you have people that are just pitiful, pathetic punks like Uni He
> hides behind his computer, and hides behind his countless aliases - you'd
> think he'd have a mission or purpose to do some good, but no he's just a
> sorrowful punk, pervert, troll. Even his 80 year old mother calls his,
> "Loser".
>
> Newbies read the following links to get an idea of his wonderful "talent".
> Then you'll undoubtedly killfile this pathetic pervert...
>
> Here are some of Uni's Posts: http://tinyurl.com/4rg8p
>
> And still more... http://tinyurl.com/6o8b3
>
>
>
> ":^) ®
>
> Combaticus
>
> PS: Consider this a Public Service Announcement
>
>
> "Chris Hughes" <chris.hughes@epicure.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:hszL2fIbjyUBFwZI@epicure.demon.co.uk...
> (Mark Twain)
>
>
| |
| LindaN 2004-09-24, 7:18 pm |
|
"T a n y a" <tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com> wrote in message
news:10l4fp02cv9djbc@corp.supernews.com...
> He's just a logo designer...
>
> If you wanna talk artists... look up people such as Linda Berkgvist, Amy
> Brown. Just a couple of my favourite artists,
> but there are millions out there and everyone has their own opinion about
> their favourite artist.
>
> Though.. I do agree with you that this cartoon drawer is quite talented!
> But he's not a logo designer... and THAT'S what
> we're actually talking about here! Thus... the question mark (?) at the
> end of artist in the subject field when talking
> about "Mike"!
Yes, I agree art is subjective as is each individual's choice of Artist
which is normally based on the genre of art. There is a very wide range of
art specialties and a person specializing in one is not necessarily going to
be good or knowledgeable about other specialties. For example a Painter is
not necessarily going to be good at the art of 'Type' or the art of business
logo design. Likewise the Logo Designer (a specialty of Graphic Design) may
not excell at painting. Yet, the art of type is just as important in design
and layout as the art of painting is to a gallery, as is the art of logo
design to the business community. You look for an appropriate Graphic Artist
(one that specializes in logo design) when you want a company logo made, and
logo design is an 'Art' that some Graphic 'Artists' specialize in. A Logo
Designer is an Artist, just like Van Gogh was a Painter and Artist.
Your frustration with this person Mike is quite obvious (it is actually
coming across as a burning hatred that is eating you up) in posts where you
bring him up. In your attempts to hurt this Mike person (who seems not to
give two hoots what you think) you indirectly claimed that Logo Designers
are not Artists without any regard to how many Logo Designers that you
didn't have a beef with, and who know differently, are reading this group as
well. It appears you are losing a battle you appear to be fighting by
yourself.
I don't know this Mike person, nor do I care who likes him and who doesn't.
His art work is well done for the speciality it falls under in my opinion,
and looking at well done art is something I enjoy. Whether I like the Artist
or not is a moot point to me. It is really too bad that your hatred for Mike
has to blind you so much in a few posts because your neutral posts in other
threads indicate you are a fun and refreshing person.
Take care,
Linda
| |
| fugitive 2004-09-24, 7:18 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:23:22 -0300, "LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote:
>
>"T a n y a" <tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com> wrote in message
>news:10l4fp02cv9djbc@corp.supernews.com...
>
>Yes, I agree art is subjective as is each individual's choice of Artist
>which is normally based on the genre of art. There is a very wide range of
>art specialties and a person specializing in one is not necessarily going to
>be good or knowledgeable about other specialties. For example a Painter is
>not necessarily going to be good at the art of 'Type' or the art of business
>logo design. Likewise the Logo Designer (a specialty of Graphic Design) may
>not excell at painting. Yet, the art of type is just as important in design
>and layout as the art of painting is to a gallery, as is the art of logo
>design to the business community. You look for an appropriate Graphic Artist
>(one that specializes in logo design) when you want a company logo made, and
>logo design is an 'Art' that some Graphic 'Artists' specialize in. A Logo
>Designer is an Artist, just like Van Gogh was a Painter and Artist.
>
>Your frustration with this person Mike is quite obvious (it is actually
>coming across as a burning hatred that is eating you up) in posts where you
>bring him up. In your attempts to hurt this Mike person (who seems not to
>give two hoots what you think) you indirectly claimed that Logo Designers
>are not Artists without any regard to how many Logo Designers that you
>didn't have a beef with, and who know differently, are reading this group as
>well. It appears you are losing a battle you appear to be fighting by
>yourself.
>
>I don't know this Mike person, nor do I care who likes him and who doesn't.
>His art work is well done for the speciality it falls under in my opinion,
>and looking at well done art is something I enjoy. Whether I like the Artist
>or not is a moot point to me. It is really too bad that your hatred for Mike
>has to blind you so much in a few posts because your neutral posts in other
>threads indicate you are a fun and refreshing person.
>
>Take care,
>Linda
>
And what is your reason for wanting to bring logic and reason the this
group, as it has not been too popular in the past;-)
| |
| LindaN 2004-09-24, 7:18 pm |
|
"fugitive" <gregfarr@earthlink..net> wrote in message
news:d106l017hticvr47o3cd9k6tb4ken2ok6r@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:23:22 -0300, "LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote:
>
> And what is your reason for wanting to bring logic and reason the this
> group, as it has not been too popular in the past;-)
Prove your insinuations. You have a database of posts in this group from me
dating back to 1996 to search and choose from. You'll be hard pressed to
find more than a rare and short lived moment of giving in to the tempation
of name calling.
I wonder if a search for your posts in the last two years would prove the
same.
Linda
| |
|
| LindaN wrote:
> "fugitive" <gregfarr@earthlink..net> wrote in message
> news:d106l017hticvr47o3cd9k6tb4ken2ok6r@4ax.com...
>
> Prove your insinuations. You have a database of posts in this group
> from me dating back to 1996 to search and choose from. You'll be hard
> pressed to find more than a rare and short lived moment of giving in
> to the tempation of name calling.
>
> I wonder if a search for your posts in the last two years would prove
> the same.
>
> Linda
As "art is in the eye of the beholder", you should allow others their
opinions too.
And if they dislike Mike personally it has to be caused by HIS postings, as
that's
all the contact anyone (TINA) in here (TINH) has with him.
--
If you find a posting or message from myself offensive, inappropriate, or
disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting,
complain to me and I will demonstrate.
---
Outgoing mail is certified probably Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/2004
| |
| fugitive 2004-09-24, 7:18 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:24:29 -0300, "LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote:
>
>"fugitive" <gregfarr@earthlink..net> wrote in message
>news:d106l017hticvr47o3cd9k6tb4ken2ok6r@4ax.com...
>
>Prove your insinuations. You have a database of posts in this group from me
>dating back to 1996 to search and choose from. You'll be hard pressed to
>find more than a rare and short lived moment of giving in to the tempation
>of name calling.
>
>I wonder if a search for your posts in the last two years would prove the
>same.
>
>Linda
>
I was giving you a comp, are you nuts?
| |
| LindaN 2004-09-24, 7:18 pm |
|
"fugitive" wrote in message
news:n2b6l0dqg50p6fjqai5ep14popdetkjrgs@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:24:29 -0300,
>
> I was giving you a comp, are you nuts?
Of course I am.
I've never been too small to apologize when I've misread a person's meaning,
so I do offer you an apology. Try not to spend it all in one place ;-)
Take care,
Linda
| |
| T a n y a 2004-09-24, 11:21 pm |
| Wow... your interpretation of what I had previously written
about "Mike" AND logo designers couldn't be further from
the truth.
I don't understand how hatred could have been portrayed so much
when I don't even know Mike! But... disrespect is another story!
Logo Designers are artists... no doubt about that, but there
is a line drawn when some logo designers steal other people's art,
and just add text to the art/logos and make a profit from it!
That is disrespectful and no doubt a copyright infringement.
If the logo's were made for personal use, that would be a different
story, but obviously.. they are not.
End of story. You obviously had misinterpreted
my previous post on the subject
--
Cheers,
- T a n y a
"LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote in message news:UFX4d.2634$KF.21084@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
>
> "T a n y a" <tanyaiscrazy@tigerstormfleet.com> wrote in message news:10l4fp02cv9djbc@corp.supernews.com...
>
> Yes, I agree art is subjective as is each individual's choice of Artist which is normally based on the genre of art.
> There is a very wide range of art specialties and a person specializing in one is not necessarily going to be good or
> knowledgeable about other specialties. For example a Painter is not necessarily going to be good at the art of 'Type'
> or the art of business logo design. Likewise the Logo Designer (a specialty of Graphic Design) may not excell at
> painting. Yet, the art of type is just as important in design and layout as the art of painting is to a gallery, as is
> the art of logo design to the business community. You look for an appropriate Graphic Artist (one that specializes in
> logo design) when you want a company logo made, and logo design is an 'Art' that some Graphic 'Artists' specialize in.
> A Logo Designer is an Artist, just like Van Gogh was a Painter and Artist.
>
> Your frustration with this person Mike is quite obvious (it is actually coming across as a burning hatred that is
> eating you up) in posts where you bring him up. In your attempts to hurt this Mike person (who seems not to give two
> hoots what you think) you indirectly claimed that Logo Designers are not Artists without any regard to how many Logo
> Designers that you didn't have a beef with, and who know differently, are reading this group as well. It appears you
> are losing a battle you appear to be fighting by yourself.
>
> I don't know this Mike person, nor do I care who likes him and who doesn't. His art work is well done for the
> speciality it falls under in my opinion, and looking at well done art is something I enjoy. Whether I like the Artist
> or not is a moot point to me. It is really too bad that your hatred for Mike has to blind you so much in a few posts
> because your neutral posts in other threads indicate you are a fun and refreshing person.
>
> Take care,
> Linda
>
| |
| fugitive 2004-09-24, 11:21 pm |
| On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:45:52 -0300, "LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote:
>
>"fugitive" wrote in message
>news:n2b6l0dqg50p6fjqai5ep14popdetkjrgs@4ax.com...
>
>Of course I am.
>
>I've never been too small to apologize when I've misread a person's meaning,
>so I do offer you an apology. Try not to spend it all in one place ;-)
>
>Take care,
>Linda
>
That puts you obove others who can't, like Ron L.
No worries.
| |
|
| in article UFX4d.2634$KF.21084@tor-nn1.netcom.ca, LindaN at Spl@.com wrote
on 09/24/2004 9:23 AM:
> Your frustration with this person Mike is quite obvious (it is actually
> coming across as a burning hatred that is eating you up) in posts where you
> bring him up. In your attempts to hurt this Mike person (who seems not to
> give two hoots what you think) you indirectly claimed that Logo Designers
> are not Artists without any regard to how many Logo Designers that you
> didn't have a beef with, and who know differently, are reading this group as
> well. It appears you are losing a battle you appear to be fighting by
> yourself.
>
> I don't know this Mike person, nor do I care who likes him and who doesn't.
> His art work is well done for the speciality it falls under in my opinion,
> and looking at well done art is something I enjoy. Whether I like the Artist
> or not is a moot point to me. It is really too bad that your hatred for Mike
> has to blind you so much in a few posts because your neutral posts in other
> threads indicate you are a fun and refreshing person.
>
> Take care,
> Linda
>
>
€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø
The New 2004 List
€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€
Version 666.20
24, Friday September, 2004 6:55:54 PM
--=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=--
========================================
Past Tributes to "Mike C."
http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute1.html
http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute2.html
http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute3.html
========================================
"I like Mike"
Slogan © The Doormouse 2004
lol... most people here just don't "get" you, Mike! :))
Janet
Uhoh...Ron just threw the door wide open to being
a MIke Christy Net Toy.
Brian Mays
Your toybox is brimming!
The Doormouse
[Mike] Are you the devil?
Brian Mays
Oh, now you've done it. You've invoked his name.
Emil Mroz
The one and only Mike C...
mezza
I'm a Mike (C.)olohic ... What about you???
Dave Moon
It's a sad man who actually TRIES to
get on the list...
Brian
Hi Mike, Isn't it about time for your annual
posting of newsgroup users comments
about you? Absolutely one of the few things in
this group worth looking forward to.
Keith
Mike hasn't lost the plot,
he just rewrites it as he goes.
Emil Mroz
See, Mike writes his little messages of
independence and responsibility to people
like you... but most 'get' the exact opposite
message, and start jumping through that hoop.
You have spent most of your time here doing
cartoons... Now you seem to need Mike for your
inspiration. Like Rubens needed women,
many of you need a Mike.
Joske
To understand the concept, you have to look
for past posts about MikeC's "game", which he
plays with his "net toys"... it's surreal...
like Mr Bean doing "The Matrix"...
"The Game"... it's actually a social thing...
a phenomenon only possible in the Virtual world.
Giuseppe Carmine De Blasio
BTW, I don't block Mike C - because his posts
are always ... aimed incisively at the ego of the
previous poster. People who buy into his game
for very long - trading sentences and paragraphs
for his one liners - appear foolish.
Mike Russell
He has been doing this for a decade or more.
You'll even occasionally see people asking openly
where Mike C is, when he hasn't shown himself for
a while. It's fair to say Mike C will be remembered
here far after you and I are gone.
Mike Russell
There actually is no Mike C. He is a computer
program developed in 1983 as a class project
in artificial intelligence by a unnamed student
at MIT. This now-antiquated software has taken
a life of it's own and has infected thousands of
Web servers around the world. In 1996 a cult of
Mike C. fans attempted to further humanize the
hoax by designing a Web site, creating Mike's
bio and adding staged photos of cult members
in disguise. The cult pre-paid the artistmike.com
hosting for 1001 years in 1999...
Dave Moon
I like Mike though, he is good at being an XXX,
not just mental like the other trolls. He makes one
think a bit... It would be not all that fun around here
without him
HillBilly Jack
Please stay on topic. This is a forum discussing
Artist Mike.
Brad H
Your frustration with this person Mike is quite
obvious (it is actually coming across as a
burning hatred that is eating you up). It appears
you are losing a battle you appear to be fighting by
yourself.
I don't know this Mike person, nor do I care who
likes him and who doesn't. His art work is well
done for the speciality it falls under in my opinion,
and looking at well done art is something I enjoy.
Linda N.
€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø
"Think you have what it takes to be added?"
No.
OpinionMan (Drew)
Thanking the good Lord.
€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€
--
Mike
* Logo Design *
Put some fun in your next logo!
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
| |
|
| in article tLmdnZbxSeIQ_sncRVn-hA@comcast.com, Gort at Gort@uranus.not wrote
on 09/24/2004 11:12 AM:
> you should allow others their
> opinions too.
How were they stopped from having any opinion they wished to have?
You're goofy.
--
Mike
* Logo Design *
Put some fun in your next logo!
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
| |
|
| Mike wrote:
> in article tLmdnZbxSeIQ_sncRVn-hA@comcast.com, Gort at
> Gort@uranus.not wrote on 09/24/2004 11:12 AM:
>
>
>
>
> How were they stopped from having any opinion they wished to have?
Who claimed they were ?
>
> You're goofy.
And you're still Fartist Mike.
--
If you find a posting or message from myself offensive, inappropriate, or
disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting,
complain to me and I will demonstrate.
| |
|
| Mike wrote:
> in article UFX4d.2634$KF.21084@tor-nn1.netcom.ca, LindaN at Spl@.com wrote
> on 09/24/2004 9:23 AM:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø
> The New 2004 List
> €ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€
>
> Version 666.20
> 24, Friday September, 2004 6:55:54 PM
>
> --=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=----=*=--
>
> ========================================
> Past Tributes to "Mike C."
> http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute1.html
> http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute2.html
> http://www.artistmike.com/MC.Tribute/Tribute3.html
> ========================================
>
>
>
>
> "I like Mike"
> Slogan © The Doormouse 2004
>
>
>
>
> lol... most people here just don't "get" you, Mike! :))
>
> Janet
>
>
>
> Uhoh...Ron just threw the door wide open to being
> a MIke Christy Net Toy.
>
> Brian Mays
>
>
>
> Your toybox is brimming!
>
> The Doormouse
>
>
>
>
> [Mike] Are you the devil?
>
> Brian Mays
>
>
>
>
> Oh, now you've done it. You've invoked his name.
>
> Emil Mroz
>
>
>
>
> The one and only Mike C...
>
> mezza
>
>
>
>
> I'm a Mike (C.)olohic ... What about you???
>
> Dave Moon
>
>
>
>
> It's a sad man who actually TRIES to
> get on the list...
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
> Hi Mike, Isn't it about time for your annual
> posting of newsgroup users comments
> about you? Absolutely one of the few things in
> this group worth looking forward to.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
> Mike hasn't lost the plot,
> he just rewrites it as he goes.
>
> Emil Mroz
>
>
>
>
> See, Mike writes his little messages of
> independence and responsibility to people
> like you... but most 'get' the exact opposite
> message, and start jumping through that hoop.
>
> You have spent most of your time here doing
> cartoons... Now you seem to need Mike for your
> inspiration. Like Rubens needed women,
> many of you need a Mike.
>
> Joske
>
>
>
>
>
> To understand the concept, you have to look
> for past posts about MikeC's "game", which he
> plays with his "net toys"... it's surreal...
> like Mr Bean doing "The Matrix"...
>
> "The Game"... it's actually a social thing...
> a phenomenon only possible in the Virtual world.
>
> Giuseppe Carmine De Blasio
>
>
>
>
>
> BTW, I don't block Mike C - because his posts
> are always ... aimed incisively at the ego of the
> previous poster. People who buy into his game
> for very long - trading sentences and paragraphs
> for his one liners - appear foolish.
>
> Mike Russell
>
>
>
>
>
> He has been doing this for a decade or more.
> You'll even occasionally see people asking openly
> where Mike C is, when he hasn't shown himself for
> a while. It's fair to say Mike C will be remembered
> here far after you and I are gone.
>
> Mike Russell
>
>
>
>
>
> There actually is no Mike C. He is a computer
> program developed in 1983 as a class project
> in artificial intelligence by a unnamed student
> at MIT. This now-antiquated software has taken
> a life of it's own and has infected thousands of
> Web servers around the world. In 1996 a cult of
> Mike C. fans attempted to further humanize the
> hoax by designing a Web site, creating Mike's
> bio and adding staged photos of cult members
> in disguise. The cult pre-paid the artistmike.com
> hosting for 1001 years in 1999...
>
> Dave Moon
>
>
>
>
> I like Mike though, he is good at being an XXX,
> not just mental like the other trolls. He makes one
> think a bit... It would be not all that fun around here
> without him
>
> HillBilly Jack
>
>
>
>
> Please stay on topic. This is a forum discussing
> Artist Mike.
>
> Brad H
>
>
>
> Your frustration with this person Mike is quite
> obvious (it is actually coming across as a
> burning hatred that is eating you up). It appears
> you are losing a battle you appear to be fighting by
> yourself.
>
> I don't know this Mike person, nor do I care who
> likes him and who doesn't. His art work is well
> done for the speciality it falls under in my opinion,
> and looking at well done art is something I enjoy.
>
> Linda N.
Linda N., huh?
http://community.webshots.com/photo.../49579552tUXIFV
:-)
Uni
>
>
>
>
> €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø
>
> "Think you have what it takes to be added?"
>
> No.
>
> OpinionMan (Drew)
> Thanking the good Lord.
>
> €ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€
| |
|
| fugitive wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:45:52 -0300, "LindaN" <Spl@.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> That puts you obove others who can't, like Ron L.
Is it true, his bro, Dave, is in prison?
:-)
Uni - Become a LVS Online student and win a Jasc T-shirt. Whoopee!
> No worries.
| |
| phaedrus 2004-09-25, 7:18 pm |
| Mike <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:
€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø
Comments about Mike Christy --
Egocentric Moron
€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€
"Tim..." <abuse@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
>"Mike" <mike@artistmike.com> wrote...
>
> It helps you make your decisions, instead
> of handing over your decisions to software.
You really do talk a load of nonsense ....
-----------
Ian Firth <ian@divsoft.com> wrote:
mike@artistmike.com says...
> Understand?
Not really. See, this is a Photoshop newsgroup.
You post photographs of clown masks and other
stuff that has nothing to do with Photoshop.
Does that make sense ? I didn't think so.
> So what is YOUR point?
That you're a talentless hack who relies on
filters to make embossed, cliched crap ?
That it's time to buy a new cinder block to
get the creative juices flowing again ?
That the trees seem to have cut off all your
sunshine ?
That you think adding "ArtistMike.com" to
stock photography somehow makes it art ?
> Why not stop fooling around and just come
> out with your gripe.
My newsreader wont let me emboss my gripe,
so it would fall on deaf ears...
> Stop by and see if my skills and talents are
> up to your standards.
I like the "Making a Logo" tutorial.
Step 1. Make a Logo.
Step 2. Apply the emboss filter.
Have you ever noticed that there are no companies
with more than 2 employees anywhere in the world
with embossed shiny logos ?
-----------
RossF wrote:
="Mike C." <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:
=>I have no need to suckle such people.
"What, did your mother refuse to breastfeed you
or something? Get over it. Why do you need to
whine about something as if people were knocking
down your door for help?"
------------
Clipson Andraw <cya@home.alone> wrote:
No kidding. Mike *is* a lame macro. All he does
is spew the same thing over and over again.
"I post as I wish", "I chuckle at you", "free speech",
"silly people". It's years of this crap.
------------
ronG <nomail@acceptedhere.inv> wrote:
"I must admit, since Mike C. never did post anything
helpful to this NG, and just spammed his way into
infamy, I have finally KF'd him. I must say that doing
that was better than using Windex on my NG screen.
Why I waited this long is beyond me."
------------
"Roger T. Imai" wrote:
> I'm a newcomer to this group, but I can see why
> you are reviled by the regulars. "Advice" like
> "I know how, hire me," is not helpful.
-----------
neil@designumbrella.com (Neil Jones) wrote:
You seem harmless enough, and usenet needs
its loons; I've met plenty ruder than you, though
very few less helpful.
------------
"Mike" <mikedean@otago.co.uk> wrote:
Hey Mike. Your village called.
They want their idiot back.
------------
RossF wrote:
There's no doubt it's a detached sort of communication
that offers a unique interactive opportunity for Mike. His
posts here are about the mental equivalent of a "Prince
Albert in a can" crank call, or a ringing doorbell with a
flaming bag of poo on the welcome mat. Requires
about the same level of bravery, too - especially with
his ISP buddy protecting him from newsgroup bullies. :)
------------
"Mike C." wrote:
> All they have to do is not respond to me. But that is
> not something that silly people can do. They must
> respond. So I get another silly person to play with.
Dimitri <platus@the-spa.com> wrote:
Yes Mike we get it. You attempt to agitate for no
reason other than to watch silly people react.
You are a simpleton and a troll.
-----------
"Balrog" <kiwiguy@themail.com> wrote:
ye gods!!
I did not go to his site, but after your post I checked
it out. Is that him on the bike? Even his hand will run
away screaming from him! No wonder he has so
much time in the day to post stupid replies on the
newsgroup - no-one wants to be in physical contact
with him.
Actually I am now starting to feel a little sorry for the
freak - but I am sure that will pass!
-----------
Tom Wahl wrote:
At first I thought he was one of those NG authorities,
but I quickly learned that he feels his particular bits
of talent puts him on a plane higher than that anyone
else is on.
-------------
Chris Williams <chris@clwill.com> wrote:
I believe I speak for the majority when I say:
Holy christ you are an obnoxious, ignorant, and
worthless douche bag. I cannot wait until you tire
of your juvenile behavior and go annoy some
other newsgroup.
------------
Mardi Wetmore wrote:
Don't worry about it. But a word of advice. Kill-file
Mike C. He is not really part of this newsgroup.
He just drops around occasionally to piss people
off with his rude remarks. The people on this
newsgroup are the most friendly and helpful you
will find anywhere on the internet.
-------------
"Chris Williams" <chris@clwill.com> wrote:
> Chuckle ... you are so silly.
You are so XXXXing childish. You pop off a flippant,
blantantly wrong answer, get caught being stupid,
and your only defense is to call people names.
My seven year old does better than that.
-------------
Ian Firth <ian@divsoft.com> wrote:
mike@artistmike.com says...
> You must be confused.
Nope, I completely understand that this newsgroup
is for sharing information about Photoshop, with
other Photoshop users. Sadly, being a dumb XXXX
hillbilly you can't seem to figure it out.
You should respect other people, and find an
appropriate group to peddle your shitty beveled
logos, and useless comments. No one appreciates
anything you offer, unless it sets you up to be a
punching bag.
-------------
"Richard J. Mackey" <mackeyrj@woh.rr.com> wrote:
=I have come to the conclusion that Mike is a jerk
-------------
Walt <foo@on.spammers> wrote:
On Thu, 07 Mar 2002 19:41:03 -0800,
Mike <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:
>The client got his logo,
No, we didn't. We got a vague approximation
of the logo we chose. Mind you, this was
AFTER we tagged you for trying to stick us
with a bilinearly interpolated "large" version
of the sample without a word of explanation.
You were trying to pull the wool over our eyes
first. Pretty lame that you would try that with a
graphics company, too. What a guy you are
Mike, what a guy. :)
Walt
Software Engineer
Black Belt Systems
http://www.blackbeltsystems.com/
-------------
From: Mike <mike@artistmike.com>
Subject: Re: How could Mac be better than PC for Graphics
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:09:53 -0800
Message-ID: <BA1AE151.205E4%mike@artistmike.com>
phaedrus phaedrus@apexmail.com wrote on 12/9/02 8:48 PM:
> I meant that I wasn't merely giving my unsupported
> opinion...
How "supported" you feel your opinion to be is
totally irrelevant to me. I would not be convienced
of the validity of your opinion if you had 50 people
to help you hold it up for you.
> I can support it with facts.
I don't care.
==============
| |
| McGrandpa 2004-09-25, 11:24 pm |
| T a n y a wrote:
> Is that who it is. LOL
> Chicken shits can't reply with just
> one name... have to make multiple ones
> to try and hide their real "identities".
> How childish. LOL
he's 'sock puppeting', another childish vein practiced widely in the
IRC's (relay chats, chatrooms). He says something under one name, then
replies under another, then often continues the discourse with yet a
third name. Looks like some 70% of this ng's activity is UNI.
Since he's using a news service that's protecting his IP, there's no
easy way to get him to leave the ng alone. The very fact that *anyone*
responds to anything at all he/she posts with anything at all feeds it.
Desperate? Lonely? Acting out needs walking all over social
boundaries? Deffo. If he/she is on probation, then they are about one
step across the wrong boundary from "Community Committment". That's
politically correct speak for institutionalized.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> - T a n y a
>
>
>
> "Chris Hughes" <chris.hughes@epicure.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:+8JMShHyDxUBFwqH@epicure.demon.co.uk... In message
> <BD7851EC.12A538%VVoid@void.com>, Voivoid <VVoid@void.com>
> writes
> Go fiddle with your Mac, Mike...
> --
> Chris Hughes
> "I intend to live for ever. So far, so good..."
> http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
| |
| T a n y a 2004-09-25, 11:24 pm |
| LMAO This was a GREAT read!
Far more amusing than the original...
Thanks..!
Although... Some ppl really do have
too much time in their hands! haha
Even if you don't get out much...
go watch a movie or somethin :-P
--
Cheers,
- T a n y a
"phaedrus" <phaedrus@apexmail.com> wrote in message news:kcadnSw_zPKIbcjcRVn-pw@centurytel.net...
> Mike <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:
>
> ?º°`°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°`°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°`°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°`°º?ø
> Comments about Mike Christy --
> Egocentric Moron
> ?ø,¸¸,ø?º°`°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°`°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°`°º?ø,¸¸,ø?
>
>
> "Tim..." <abuse@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
>
> You really do talk a load of nonsense ....
> -----------
> Ian Firth <ian@divsoft.com> wrote:
> mike@artistmike.com says...
>
> Not really. See, this is a Photoshop newsgroup.
> You post photographs of clown masks and other
> stuff that has nothing to do with Photoshop.
> Does that make sense ? I didn't think so.
>
>
> That you're a talentless hack who relies on
> filters to make embossed, cliched crap ?
> That it's time to buy a new cinder block to
> get the creative juices flowing again ?
> That the trees seem to have cut off all your
> sunshine ?
> That you think adding "ArtistMike.com" to
> stock photography somehow makes it art ?
>
>
> My newsreader wont let me emboss my gripe,
> so it would fall on deaf ears...
>
>
> I like the "Making a Logo" tutorial.
> Step 1. Make a Logo.
> Step 2. Apply the emboss filter.
> Have you ever noticed that there are no companies
> with more than 2 employees anywhere in the world
> with embossed shiny logos ?
> -----------
> RossF wrote:
>
> ="Mike C." <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:
> =>I have no need to suckle such people.
>
> "What, did your mother refuse to breastfeed you
> or something? Get over it. Why do you need to
> whine about something as if people were knocking
> down your door for help?"
> ------------
> Clipson Andraw <cya@home.alone> wrote:
>
> No kidding. Mike *is* a lame macro. All he does
> is spew the same thing over and over again.
> "I post as I wish", "I chuckle at you", "free speech",
> "silly people". It's years of this crap.
> ------------
> ronG <nomail@acceptedhere.inv> wrote:
>
> "I must admit, since Mike C. never did post anything
> helpful to this NG, and just spammed his way into
> infamy, I have finally KF'd him. I must say that doing
> that was better than using Windex on my NG screen.
> Why I waited this long is beyond me."
> ------------
> "Roger T. Imai" wrote:
>
> -----------
> neil@designumbrella.com (Neil Jones) wrote:
>
> You seem harmless enough, and usenet needs
> its loons; I've met plenty ruder than you, though
> very few less helpful.
> ------------
> "Mike" <mikedean@otago.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hey Mike. Your village called.
> They want their idiot back.
> ------------
> RossF wrote:
>
> There's no doubt it's a detached sort of communication
> that offers a unique interactive opportunity for Mike. His
> posts here are about the mental equivalent of a "Prince
> Albert in a can" crank call, or a ringing doorbell with a
> flaming bag of poo on the welcome mat. Requires
> about the same level of bravery, too - especially with
> his ISP buddy protecting him from newsgroup bullies. :)
> ------------
> "Mike C." wrote:
>
>
> Dimitri <platus@the-spa.com> wrote:
>
> Yes Mike we get it. You attempt to agitate for no
> reason other than to watch silly people react.
> You are a simpleton and a troll.
> -----------
> "Balrog" <kiwiguy@themail.com> wrote:
>
> ye gods!!
> I did not go to his site, but after your post I checked
> it out. Is that him on the bike? Even his hand will run
> away screaming from him! No wonder he has so
> much time in the day to post stupid replies on the
> newsgroup - no-one wants to be in physical contact
> with him.
> Actually I am now starting to feel a little sorry for the
> freak - but I am sure that will pass!
> -----------
> Tom Wahl wrote:
>
> At first I thought he was one of those NG authorities,
> but I quickly learned that he feels his particular bits
> of talent puts him on a plane higher than that anyone
> else is on.
> -------------
> Chris Williams <chris@clwill.com> wrote:
>
> I believe I speak for the majority when I say:
> Holy christ you are an obnoxious, ignorant, and
> worthless douche bag. I cannot wait until you tire
> of your juvenile behavior and go annoy some
> other newsgroup.
> ------------
> Mardi Wetmore wrote:
>
> Don't worry about it. But a word of advice. Kill-file
> Mike C. He is not really part of this newsgroup.
> He just drops around occasionally to piss people
> off with his rude remarks. The people on this
> newsgroup are the most friendly and helpful you
> will find anywhere on the internet.
> -------------
> "Chris Williams" <chris@clwill.com> wrote:
>
>
> You are so XXXXing childish. You pop off a flippant,
> blantantly wrong answer, get caught being stupid,
> and your only defense is to call people names.
> My seven year old does better than that.
> -------------
> Ian Firth <ian@divsoft.com> wrote:
>
> mike@artistmike.com says...
>
> Nope, I completely understand that this newsgroup
> is for sharing information about Photoshop, with
> other Photoshop users. Sadly, being a dumb XXXX
> hillbilly you can't seem to figure it out.
> You should respect other people, and find an
> appropriate group to peddle your shitty beveled
> logos, and useless comments. No one appreciates
> anything you offer, unless it sets you up to be a
> punching bag.
> -------------
> "Richard J. Mackey" <mackeyrj@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>
> =I have come to the conclusion that Mike is a jerk
> -------------
> Walt <foo@on.spammers> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2002 19:41:03 -0800,
> Mike <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:
>
>
> No, we didn't. We got a vague approximation
> of the logo we chose. Mind you, this was
> AFTER we tagged you for trying to stick us
> with a bilinearly interpolated "large" version
> of the sample without a word of explanation.
> You were trying to pull the wool over our eyes
> first. Pretty lame that you would try that with a
> graphics company, too. What a guy you are
> Mike, what a guy. :)
>
> Walt
> Software Engineer
> Black Belt Systems
> http://www.blackbeltsystems.com/
> -------------
> From: Mike <mike@artistmike.com>
> Subject: Re: How could Mac be better than PC for Graphics
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:09:53 -0800
> Message-ID: <BA1AE151.205E4%mike@artistmike.com>
>
> phaedrus phaedrus@apexmail.com wrote on 12/9/02 8:48 PM:
>
>
> How "supported" you feel your opinion to be is
> totally irrelevant to me. I would not be convienced
> of the validity of your opinion if you had 50 people
> to help you hold it up for you.
>
>
> I don't care.
> ==============
>
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|