| Author |
Canopus ADVC100 or 300??
|
|
| Luis F Cruz 2004-09-21, 11:24 pm |
| I need to get a video capture device, and I have these two in mind!. I would
like to know if somebody has seen the output of these two converters. Does
the ADVC300 really make a difference?
Thank you!
| |
| Kent McPherson 2004-09-21, 11:24 pm |
| I can tell you I'm very happy with the quality I get from my ADVC-100.
"Luis F Cruz" <luisfdoc1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:isqdndlmEcY5FYPcRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> I need to get a video capture device, and I have these two in mind!. I
would
> like to know if somebody has seen the output of these two converters. Does
> the ADVC300 really make a difference?
> Thank you!
>
>
| |
| metabol-video 2005-03-07, 11:20 pm |
| Well that depends on your need. If you have clients with older analog
video with possible time base errors, faded blacks and non-white
whites then I would strongly recommend you spend the extra money on
the ADVC300. I have it and it corrects these while capturing. Although
the 100 does a decent job of capturing it does not have the ability to
fix these common problems. Good luck.
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:50:43 -0400, "Luis F Cruz"
<luisfdoc1@comcast.net> wrote:
>I need to get a video capture device, and I have these two in mind!. I would
>like to know if somebody has seen the output of these two converters. Does
>the ADVC300 really make a difference?
>Thank you!
>
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2009 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |