| steggy 2006-08-15, 6:16 pm |
| Neil Gould wrote:
> Recently, michael adams <mjadams25@onetel.net.uk> posted:
>
>
>
> In this case, the object is the insurance, not the condition, i.e. the
> condition existied, the insurance did not. The "condition" can not
> "pre-exist"... it either exists or it doesn't. So, it would seem that
> proper usage would call such a "pre-purchase" condition (ergo,
> "pre-insurance", above).
>
>
>
> The issue is not what one does in an initial planning stage, but what one
> calls such a stage. It would seem appropriate to consider the collection
> of data as part of the initial planning process, as that collection is
> clearly goal-directed. Non goal-directed data collection is not part of
> any planning process, so it would render the idea of calling it
> "pre-planning" as meaningless as one's elementary education, for example.
>
> Neil
>
>
Aren't we by know making this a pre emptive war?
Another example of pre planning distruction just because of a hunch.....
|