This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Adobe Illustrator > February 2004 > CorelDraw versus Illustrator
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
CorelDraw versus Illustrator
|
|
| Marie Hélène Vermeersch 2004-02-14, 10:28 am |
| As a school for adults, we intend to put graphic soft on our curriculum.
We've had some experience with CorelDraw in the past, but now hesitate to
use Illustrator instead. Can anyone tell me from personal experience which
program is best and why?
Bye the way, this is urgent.
Thanks in advance for your reply.
--
Marie Hélène Vermeersch
Hogestraat 67
8820 TORHOUT
050 22 00 73
0477 65 31 21
mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com
| |
| Joanne Weston 2004-02-15, 12:28 pm |
| You'll get as many answers for this question as there are illustrator users
and Coreldraw users combined, for my part ( I have used both ) I find
Illustrator the easiest to use. The speed with which I can use the keyboard
shortcuts in tandem with the mouse means I can get things done a lot quicker
in illustrator. The working space in Coreldraw also seems a little too
cluttered, though if you are on a budget Coreldraw is good (no question of
that ) and much cheaper.
Regards,
Matt
"Marie Hélène Vermeersch" <mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:402e281d$0$318$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> As a school for adults, we intend to put graphic soft on our curriculum.
> We've had some experience with CorelDraw in the past, but now hesitate to
> use Illustrator instead. Can anyone tell me from personal experience which
> program is best and why?
> Bye the way, this is urgent.
>
> Thanks in advance for your reply.
>
> --
> Marie Hélène Vermeersch
> Hogestraat 67
> 8820 TORHOUT
> 050 22 00 73
> 0477 65 31 21
> mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com
>
>
| |
| Alexgirl 2004-02-15, 6:28 pm |
| Each person has their own preference. I have used both, for print and for
web. Overall, I prefer Illustrator. For print media, it is far more industry
standard. For web, it has more support from Photoshop than Corel gives with
Photopaint, however Corel has Rave now and I don't know if Illustrator has
something compatible with it. I wasn't too impressed with Rave anyway.
Illustrator also has the support through Acrobat (.pdf files). In general,
my statement would be Illustrator is for the professionals and Draw is for
offices that do graphics as an aside, rather than the main product.
--
Alex
Use between nospam to reply
"Marie Hélène Vermeersch" <mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:402e281d$0$318$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> As a school for adults, we intend to put graphic soft on our curriculum.
> We've had some experience with CorelDraw in the past, but now hesitate to
> use Illustrator instead. Can anyone tell me from personal experience which
> program is best and why?
> Bye the way, this is urgent.
>
> Thanks in advance for your reply.
>
> --
> Marie Hélène Vermeersch
> Hogestraat 67
> 8820 TORHOUT
> 050 22 00 73
> 0477 65 31 21
> mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com
>
>
| |
| res0r89p 2004-02-15, 8:28 pm |
| Hi,
I use both. Illustrator has a somewhat higher acceptance in the
professional arena, but Coreldraw is a close second. Coreldraw is much
cheaper, if price is a factor, and it has more readily accessble special
effects. It's probably easier to learn, too.Coreldraw 9 can be had for as
little fas $39.00 on some web stores. I bought Coreldraw 11(minus
Photopaint) for $74.00 from Buy.com some months ago.
Peter Cowie
"Marie Hélène Vermeersch" <mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:402e281d$0$318$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> As a school for adults, we intend to put graphic soft on our curriculum.
> We've had some experience with CorelDraw in the past, but now hesitate to
> use Illustrator instead. Can anyone tell me from personal experience which
> program is best and why?
> Bye the way, this is urgent.
>
> Thanks in advance for your reply.
>
> --
> Marie Hélène Vermeersch
> Hogestraat 67
> 8820 TORHOUT
> 050 22 00 73
> 0477 65 31 21
> mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.566 / Virus Database: 357 - Release Date: 1/22/2004
| |
|
| "Marie Hélène Vermeersch" <mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com>
wrote in message news:402e281d$0$318$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> As a school for adults, we intend to put graphic soft on our curriculum.
> We've had some experience with CorelDraw in the past, but now hesitate to
> use Illustrator instead. Can anyone tell me from personal experience which
> program is best and why?
I jump between CorelDRAW, Adobe Illustrator and Macromedia Freehand on a
regular basis. They all have their various strengths and weaknesses.
The main reason I like CorelDRAW is its very good toolset. I can do a lot
more in technical object creation within that program (and at a far faster
rate) than I can in AI and FH. CorelDRAW has a faster screen refresh than
AI and FH. CorelDRAW does have one major drawback. It doesn't do well for
print production, at least not without a lot of help from proprietary
software.
I like Illustrator for the way it integrates with Adobe Photoshop and After
Effects. Although I'll generate a lot of paths within Corel, generally I'll
take EPS exports from there to modify further in Illustrator before sending
to Photoshop or After Effects. Illustrator has improved its toolset a great
deal over the past couple versions, giving the program a few creative
options not offered in competing vector apps.
Freehand has fallen out of favor quite a bit lately, with no small part of
blame going to Macromedia for neglecting the program in favor of putting
nearly all their development resources into web app development. They also
let Fontographer die on the vine, which really angered me. Still, Freehand
has a color print engine second to none. It's print production quality is
what sold me on that app.
| |
| schmidty 2004-02-26, 12:28 am |
| Illustrator for sure
I find that corel crashes way more than any adobe product i have ever used.
besides illustrator is more of a standard in the industry and will likely
have a more sustainable lifetime. (e.g. more upgrades and longer life)
Schmidty
"Marie Hélène Vermeersch" <mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:402e281d$0$318$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be...
> As a school for adults, we intend to put graphic soft on our curriculum.
> We've had some experience with CorelDraw in the past, but now hesitate to
> use Illustrator instead. Can anyone tell me from personal experience which
> program is best and why?
> Bye the way, this is urgent.
>
> Thanks in advance for your reply.
>
> --
> Marie Hélène Vermeersch
> Hogestraat 67
> 8820 TORHOUT
> 050 22 00 73
> 0477 65 31 21
> mh_vermeersch@hotmail.com
>
>
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|