This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Computer Graphics with Photoshop > August 2005 > CS on a laptop - external USB scratch disk?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
CS on a laptop - external USB scratch disk?
|
|
| you know who maybe 2005-08-30, 11:14 pm |
| I have a recent Windows XP laptop and ran CS on it for about a year but now
I'm shooting everything in RAW and when I have a large preview window (about
1/2 screen) and have 500 or more files in a single folder CS seems to slow
to a crawl as it is "generating previews".
The files are from the older Canon 1D (TIF RAW). I'd rather it not generate
the previews - I can wait for the preview to be displayed when I select the
thumbnail.Can I turn this off?
The thumbnails are generated quick enough and that's great. But in the
background it's generating previews and runs out of RAM and starts swapping
to disk. When the disk and CPU are saturated I can't even select the Flag
icon when trying to sort images.
I saw someone mention adding an external hard drive as a scratch disk might
help, but USB 2 isn't that fast to be of help, is it? Even a firewire
drive is not going to get me EIDE speeds, right?
I've got 1GB of RAM and set my paging file to start at 2 GB and max at 4GB.
I could add more RAM to 2GB but if I have 2000 files in the folder it's
going to use up that as well.
One time I waited 45 minutes for the previews to build and came back after
lunch and it was pretty quick, until I renamed a folder at the top of the
tree and then it started rebuilding all the previews all over again. Doh!
Thanks for reading and I appreciate any ideas you have.
| |
| Bill Hilton 2005-08-30, 11:14 pm |
| >when I have a large preview window and have 500 or more
>files in a single folder CS seems to slow to a crawl as it
>is "generating previews".
I use a laptop to download and review RAW files when traveling and face
these same problems ... one thing I do is keep the number of files in
each folder to about half what you have ... I'm guessing you're
shooting 2 GB cards since I get about half this many with an 8 Mpix 1D
Mark II and your 1D is 4 Mpix?
>I'd rather it not generate the previews - I can wait for the
>preview to be displayed when I select the thumbnail.Can
>I turn this off?
Don't use File Browser? (yeah, I know, not practical :) Other than
that I don't know how to keep FB from generating the previews.
>The thumbnails are generated quick enough and that's great.
They are part of the Canon .tif file, what you see on the camera's LCD
when you check images in-camera, so they just get loaded, not
generated.
>I saw someone mention adding an external hard drive as a
>scratch disk might help, but USB 2 isn't that fast to be of
>help, is it? Even a firewire drive is not going to get me
>EIDE speeds, right?
I tested external drive options for scratch disk on a desktop and got
these results ... 100% (fastest) with two internal hard drives (no
surprise) ... using C as scratch with 50% RAM allocation slowed to 128%
(with more RAM allocated the total times went down but the % went up to
148% so obviously it depends on how much time is spent paging out of
RAM) ... I tested two USB 2 drives, one gave 232 % (ie more than twice
as long), the other 242 %. Tested a 1394 (Firewire) drive which took
148% with 50% RAM allocation, so about 20% slower than just C drive but
much faster than the USB 2 drives.
This was with a desktop with faster internal drives than on a laptop so
the % will be different with a laptop and it's possible 1394 might
start to approach the speed of just using C drive, though the only way
to know is to test it. But basically I'd be surprised if you gain much
if anything and wouldn't be stunned to learn that even 1394 is slower
than using just C.
>I've got 1GB of RAM
How much is allocated to Photoshop, just the default 50%? You can
usually bump this up to 75% (I run 86% on my desktops but have more
than 1 GB) without problems so long as you aren't running other
programs at the same time.
>One time I waited 45 minutes for the previews to build and ... it was
>pretty quick, until I renamed a folder at the top of the
>tree and then it started rebuilding all the previews all over again
If you export the cache in that folder it won't have to regenerate the
previews the next time you open it ... Bruce Fraser's book "Camera Raw
with ... CS" has this tip and many others regarding using the File
Browser and the RAW converter more efficiently.
>Thanks for reading and I appreciate any ideas you have.
To sum it up, I'd recommend having fewer images per folder so you don't
hit scratch when generating previews, bumping up the RAM allocation if
it's at default 50%, not using a 1394 external as scratch (and
definitely not using a USB 2) and periodically running export - cache
to save off the previews you generated.
One other suggestion is to look at other converters that might generate
previews faster ... I use Capture One for most of my serious desktop
RAW conversion work but also have RSE, which is free, and use it on the
laptop on the road when I have to look at a lot of images quickly.
With the 1D Mark II (8 Mpixels) the RAW files are typically 6-8 MB and
each Capture One preview is 2.6 MB or so while each RSE preview is only
846 KB, so using RSE on the road saves on temporary disk space too.
Both of these will still take several minutes to generate 500 previews
but probably not the 45 minutes you mention for Photoshop. I think it
takes about 8-10 minutes to generate 250 or so previews for example (a
2 GB CF card's worth). Worth looking into if this is really bugging
you ...
Bill
| |
| you know who maybe 2005-08-31, 11:15 pm |
|
"Bill Hilton" <bhilton665@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1125453653.624317.31070@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Bill, thank you so much for taking the time to give me so much info! I have
not give RSE enough time yet but this winter I am going to start working on
an entirely new workflow. I switched to RAW in the middle of this year and
though I don't regret it, my workflow could use some refinement. For now Ill
keep the folders small
Thanks again,
-Bob
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|