This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters  


Home > Archive > Computer Graphics with Photoshop > May 2005 > Selection of format?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Selection of format?
ergobob

2005-05-25, 7:14 pm

Hello Everyone,

I am copying several photos from the Web and pasting them into a new
website.

I have found that the jpg format seems to be best in terms of quality,
permits use of filters in PS, and the file size is rather small.

When I use gif or bmp, I find the quality is not as good, the options in PS
are limited, and/or the file size is larger.

Does jpg format seem like the best choice for copy and paste on the Web in
terms of quality and size?

Thanks a lot,

Bob


Tom Thomas

2005-05-25, 7:14 pm

"ergobob" <ergobob@sonic[REMOVE].net> wrote:

>I am copying several photos from the Web and pasting them into a new
>website.


I certainly hope the images belong to you, or you have permission.

>I have found that the jpg format seems to be best in terms of quality,
>permits use of filters in PS, and the file size is rather small.


File size of JPG images is a function of the amount of compression
applied and the image content. It's a tradeoff between size and
quality. You can use Photoshop filters because JPG is in RGB color
mode.

>When I use gif or bmp, I find the quality is not as good, the options in PS
>are limited, and/or the file size is larger.


GIF is indexed color, and BMP can be indexed color as well. That
limits the options in Photoshop. They can be changed to RBG for
editing if you need to.

>Does jpg format seem like the best choice for copy and paste on the Web in
>terms of quality and size?


The best choice depends on the image quality and usage. GIF is
usually best for images containing large flat areas of color like
logos, whereas JPG is usually a better choice for photographic images.
JPG does not support transparancy while GIF does.

File sizes can be larger or smaller for either of the two, depending
on image content, compression, number of colors (in indexed color
images), etc. Try a 4-up comparison in "Save for Web" to see how
different options affect the quality and file sizes.
------------------
Tom

Unsolicited advertisements cheerfully ignored.
Owen Ransen

2005-05-25, 7:14 pm

On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:50:07 GMT, "ergobob"
<ergobob@sonic[REMOVE].net> wrote:

>Does jpg format seem like the best choice for copy and paste on the Web in
>terms of quality and size?
>Bob


This 1-page explanation may help you

http://www.ransen.com/Articles/Form...age-Formats.htm



Craig Flory

2005-05-25, 7:14 pm

My only question is ... do you have permission from the owner of the web
site ??? If the images are copyrighted there is a $10,000.00 federal
copyright law fine when caught. If you have written permission, you are ok.
I'm a member of the copyright team from Professional Photographers of
America and we check these things out. So make sure you have permission
first.

Craig Flory


Lorem Ipsum

2005-05-25, 7:14 pm


"Craig Flory" <floryphotog@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:Es5le.425$MI4.281@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> My only question is ... do you have permission from the owner of the web
> site ??? If the images are copyrighted there is a $10,000.00 federal
> copyright law fine [...]


Craig, don't you folks in Pennsylvania have any clean water?
http://www.mindspring.com/~florypho.../pics/f_001.jpg



Craig Flory

2005-05-25, 11:14 pm

The "pond' is actually just a depression where rain water collects. I guess
you thought it would be
fun to grab a copyrighted image. The fines are not a joke. Professional
photos are copyrighted and
the fines are as steep as illegally copying a VCR tape or a DVD. I was just
trying to point out to the
guy why he should make sure first before grabbing something copyrighted.


Sponsored Links


Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com  Software forum  Computer Hardware reviews