This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters  


Home > Archive > Computer Graphics with Photoshop > May 2004 > Re: draw with photoshop





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: draw with photoshop
Tacit

2004-05-23, 7:14 pm

>I must realize an illustration that will be plotted in a big size (400 cm
>x 250 cm), how can I make that without lost in definition ? If I make a file
>with width 11339 pixel and height 7087 pixel is a very big file and my
>computer work very slow.


Buy more memory. If you can, buy a larger computer.

A file that large is about 230 MB in RGB, or about 306 MB in CMYK. That's not
unreasonably large; I work with files that large or larger on a regular basis.

I have manipulated files well over 400 MB in size on a several-generations-old,
400MHz G3 system without difficulty. However, that system has 640 MB of RAM,
and would be better off with more still. If you intend to work on files in the
200-400 MB range, it is absolutely essential that your computer have sufficient
RAM--it's the single best investment you can make in Photoshop speed.

--
Biohazard? Radiation hazard? SO last-century.
Nanohazard T-shirts now available! http://www.villaintees.com
Art, literature, shareware, polyamory, kink, and more:
http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

Harry Limey

2004-05-23, 7:14 pm

Could you make it 40 x 25 and enlarge when complete?

"GERONIMO" <geronimo@linuxwaves.com> wrote in message
news:mQ4sc.321944$rM4.13401034@news4.tin.it...
> I must realize an illustration that will be plotted in a big size (400 cm

x
> 250 cm), how can I make that without lost in definition ? If I make a

file
> with width 11339 pixel and height 7087 pixel is a very big file and my
> computer work very slow.
>
>



Harry Limey

2004-05-23, 7:14 pm

Sorry - just noticed the bit about "loss in definition" you would obviously
get some of that!!!

"Harry Limey" <harrylimey@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2hc8cfFb55dtU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Could you make it 40 x 25 and enlarge when complete?
>
> "GERONIMO" <geronimo@linuxwaves.com> wrote in message
> news:mQ4sc.321944$rM4.13401034@news4.tin.it...
cm[color=darkred]
> x
> file
>
>



Xalinai

2004-05-23, 7:14 pm

On 23 May 2004 18:05:49 GMT, tacitr@aol.com (Tacit) wrote:

>
>Buy more memory. If you can, buy a larger computer.
>
>A file that large is about 230 MB in RGB, or about 306 MB in CMYK. That's not
>unreasonably large; I work with files that large or larger on a regular basis.
>
>I have manipulated files well over 400 MB in size on a several-generations-old,
>400MHz G3 system without difficulty. However, that system has 640 MB of RAM,
>and would be better off with more still. If you intend to work on files in the
>200-400 MB range, it is absolutely essential that your computer have sufficient
>RAM--it's the single best investment you can make in Photoshop speed.
>


I am a bit surprised. Wouldn't that be the time to recommend doing the
illustration vector based? The size given together with the pixel
numbers show a 72dpi image which leads to certain ideas about the
process going on here....

Michael
Stuart

2004-05-24, 12:14 pm

Xalinai wrote:
> On 23 May 2004 18:05:49 GMT, tacitr@aol.com (Tacit) wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I am a bit surprised. Wouldn't that be the time to recommend doing the
> illustration vector based? The size given together with the pixel
> numbers show a 72dpi image which leads to certain ideas about the
> process going on here....
>
> Michael



I agree with Xalinai but it cold depend on what he is trying to do,
maybe a combination of Photoshop with Illustrator and/or InDesign.

Stuart

Sponsored Links


Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com  Software forum  Computer Hardware reviews