This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Webmaster forum > February 2007 > GnoZtiK - new free seo soft
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
GnoZtiK - new free seo soft
|
|
|
| Hello,
We have just released a new free SEO soft (beta version) that we think
innovating. We'd like to have your feedback.
You can download it at,
http://www.gnoztik.com
Regards,
William Linson
(GnoZtiK Webmaster)
| |
| Matt Probert 2007-02-16, 6:18 am |
| On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:49:29 +0100, at <"w i l l i a m . l i n s o n
(at) g n o z t i k . c o m"> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>We have just released a new free SEO soft (beta version) that we think
>innovating. We'd like to have your feedback.
>
I think you should either offer an English version of your site, or
post in the same language as your site is written in.
Matt
| |
|
| > I think you should either offer an English version of your site, or
> post in the same language as your site is written in.
there is an english version,
click on the uk flag at the top right hand corner
William
| |
| Matt Probert 2007-02-16, 6:20 pm |
| On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:14:35 +0100, at <"w i l l i a m . l i n s o n
(at) g n o z t i k . c o m"> wrote:
>there is an english version,
>click on the uk flag at the top right hand corner
>
Apparently not obvious enough!
Anyways. I have now tried it (as you know).
I'll skip any complimentary comments, they cannot benefit you. I do
find some of the advice confusing, and some even odd.
One page I checked was reported as only having a certain word occuring
"a little bit", but in fact the word occurs many many times throughout
the text. I wonder if you are measuring the relative density of the
word, rather than its actual count?
I really don't understand the backlinks advice at all. Are you trying
to refer to backlinks within the site or from external sites?
I keep forgetting to click the "start" button after entering the audit
details. This is an ergonmics issue that needs addressing.
Under the "presentation tag" you start off with a phrase, such as
The query [my keytword] is hyper-competing
What do you mean by "hyper-competing" or the other odd terms that are
inserted? Can you be more explicit please.
Under chart you list outbound and inbound link rates and describe the
"general context", but offer no explanation as to what you mean.
I can understand the term "very unfavourable", but WHY? How should one
improve upon this?
Matt
| |
| Karl Groves 2007-02-16, 6:20 pm |
| at <"w i l l i a m . l i n s o n (at) g n o z t i k . c o m"> wrote in
news:45d58c31$0$21143$7a628cd7@news.club-internet.fr:
> Hello,
>
>
> We have just released a new free SEO soft (beta version) that we think
> innovating. We'd like to have your feedback.
>
When you're in the first 100 results for "SEO Software", or "free seo
tool" let us know.
Until then, take your spam somewhere else.
--
Karl Groves
http://karlcore.com
http://chevelle.karlcore.com
| |
| Karl Groves 2007-02-16, 6:20 pm |
| Karl Groves <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote in
news:Xns98D96354C8018karlkarlcorecom@199.45.49.11:
> at <"w i l l i a m . l i n s o n (at) g n o z t i k . c o m"> wrote in
> news:45d58c31$0$21143$7a628cd7@news.club-internet.fr:
>
>
> When you're in the first 100 results for "SEO Software", or "free seo
> tool" let us know.
> Until then, take your spam somewhere else.
Addendum -
You're not even in ANY results for your own damn name.
Great software ya got there, sparky.
--
Karl Groves
http://karlcore.com
http://chevelle.karlcore.com
| |
|
| >>> I think you should either offer an English version of your site, or
>
> Apparently not obvious enough!
We just thought doing as many other websites.
>
> Anyways. I have now tried it (as you know).
>
> I'll skip any complimentary comments, they cannot benefit you. I do
> find some of the advice confusing, and some even odd.
>
> One page I checked was reported as only having a certain word occuring
> "a little bit", but in fact the word occurs many many times throughout
> the text. I wonder if you are measuring the relative density of the
> word, rather than its actual count?
"a little bit" refers to a count difference between the top 10 and your page
(your word is less represented in your page than the top 10's mean). Our
HTML measure is partially (fully would be pretentious ;-) based on the LSI
algorithm (used by Google). It measures the "textual distance" between the
top 10 (considered by Google as the reference) and your page.
>
> I really don't understand the backlinks advice at all. Are you trying
> to refer to backlinks within the site or from external sites?
external sites.
>
> I keep forgetting to click the "start" button after entering the audit
> details. This is an ergonmics issue that needs addressing.
it's in debate inside the team.
>
> Under the "presentation tag" you start off with a phrase, such as
>
> The query [my keytword] is hyper-competing
>
> What do you mean by "hyper-competing" or the other odd terms that are
> inserted? Can you be more explicit please.
"hyper-competing" means there are many competitors on this keyword (ex :
mp3).
English is not our mother tongue. If you have any suggests to improve our
translation, feel free to do so (http://www.gnoztik.com/translation.htm).
>
> Under chart you list outbound and inbound link rates and describe the
> "general context", but offer no explanation as to what you mean.
> I can understand the term "very unfavourable", but WHY? How should one
> improve upon this?
It's a general information which evaluates the weakests pages from the top
10 (outbound links) and the strongests out of the top 10 (inbound links).
The difference between these two infos gives the potential number of
available places in the top 10.
GnoZtiK is quite young (only few days old :-)... we keep on improving our
free solution (algo, content, help, etc...).
Thank you for taking the time to give us your precious feedback.
| |
| Matt Probert 2007-02-16, 6:20 pm |
| On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:53:19 +0100, "at" <w i l l i a m . l i n s o n
(at) g n o z t i k . c o m> wrote:
>
>"a little bit" refers to a count difference between the top 10 and your page
>(your word is less represented in your page than the top 10's mean). Our
>HTML measure is partially (fully would be pretentious ;-) based on the LSI
>algorithm (used by Google). It measures the "textual distance" between the
>top 10 (considered by Google as the reference) and your page.
Might I suggest. Drop all ambiguous terms, like "little bit" and
replace them with a number on a fixed scale, and properly explain the
reason for the number.
So, lets say a page scores "3" with 1 being the lowest and 10 the
best, because although it carries the keyword 20 times on its page,
the count on the top 10 pages is 100 times.
>
>
>external sites.
More descriptions and explanations required in the results, please.
>
>it's in debate inside the team.
>
You have this user's feedback
>
>"hyper-competing" means there are many competitors on this keyword (ex :
>mp3).
>English is not our mother tongue. If you have any suggests to improve our
>translation, feel free to do so (http://www.gnoztik.com/translation.htm).
Again, replace the terms with a number on a fixed scale, together with
detailed descriptions.
>
>
>It's a general information which evaluates the weakests pages from the top
>10 (outbound links) and the strongests out of the top 10 (inbound links).
>The difference between these two infos gives the potential number of
>available places in the top 10.
I have no idea what you are talking about!
>
>GnoZtiK is quite young (only few days old :-)... we keep on improving our
>free solution (algo, content, help, etc...).
That's okay. It is clear from the term "beta" that this is under
development, and that's what Usenet is for. Requesting peer reviews
and assistance.
>
>Thank you for taking the time to give us your precious feedback.
>
No problem. You owe me a beer.
Matt
| |
| Paul Watt 2007-02-16, 6:20 pm |
|
"at" <"w i l l i a m . l i n s o n (at) g n o z t i k . c o m"> wrote in
message news:45d58c31$0$21143$7a628cd7@news.club-internet.fr...
> Hello,
>
>
> We have just released a new free SEO soft (beta version) that we think
> innovating. We'd like to have your feedback.
>
> You can download it at,
> http://www.gnoztik.com
>
>
> Regards,
> William Linson
> (GnoZtiK Webmaster)
I tried the term Kyokushinkai (a form of karate) and a web site I run
http://www.dunmowkarate.co.uk and I got places 3 and 4 on the list.
I received this message from the webpage that anoyingly popped up :
"Undoubtedly, Your URL appears overestimated. You need more backlinks.
Improve your SEO and don't miss the target ! " and there was me thinking
that positions 3rd and 4th was pretty good!
I also find the fact that you have to hit the start button after filling out
the form a PITA.
--
Cheers
Paul watt
http://www.paulwattdesigns.com
http://www.amnesty.org
| |
| phatspliff2000@hotmail.com 2007-02-17, 3:16 am |
| On Feb 16, 2:46 pm, Karl Groves <k...@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote:
> When you're in the first 100 results for "SEO Software", or "free seo
> tool" let us know.
> Until then, take your spam somewhere else.
Hey Kuntish Karl, wake up and smell the coffee, this group has a new
charter where spam is now welcome. So if you don't like it XXXX off.
I checked your online resume.....advertising salesman to 'director of
website design' - it's strange the names the unemployed dream up
these days LOL
| |
| Kim André Akerĝ 2007-02-17, 6:21 pm |
| phatspliff2000@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2:46 pm, Karl Groves <k...@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Kuntish Karl, wake up and smell the coffee, this group has a new
> charter where spam is now welcome. So if you don't like it XXXX off.
No, it hasn't. The "old" charter is still as valid as before.
You can't just put up a text that says "spam is welcome" and slap a FAQ
sticker on it. That's just being moronic. There's nothing "A" about it,
neither does it apply to any "Q"'s, and as for the "F", those who spam
are likely to lose their hosting/affiliate account, as well as their
Usenet access account.
> I checked your online resume.....advertising salesman to 'director of
> website design' - it's strange the names the unemployed dream up
> these days LOL
You're constantly critisizing others for having bad designs, but you
have yet to show any websites you've designed, or even been a webmaster
for. Until you do, I'm still going to assume you're just an idiot who
can't tell apart his own XXX from a hole in the ground.
*sigh*
--
Kim André Akerĝ
- kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com
(remove NOSPAM to contact me directly)
| |
|
| On Feb 17, 5:00 am, Kim Andr=E9 Aker=F8 <kiman...@NOSPAMbetadome.com>
wrote:
> phatspliff2...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> You're constantly critisizing others for having bad designs, but you
> have yet to show any websites you've designed, or even been a webmaster
> for. Until you do, I'm still going to assume you're just an idiot who
> can't tell apart his own XXX from a hole in the ground.
>
> *sigh*
the smell gives it away
| |
| nullified 2007-02-17, 6:21 pm |
| On 17 Feb 2007 13:00:59 GMT, Kim André Akerĝ
<kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> wrote:
>phatspliff2000@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>No, it hasn't. The "old" charter is still as valid as before.
>
>You can't just put up a text that says "spam is welcome" and slap a FAQ
>sticker on it. That's just being moronic. There's nothing "A" about it,
>neither does it apply to any "Q"'s, and as for the "F", those who spam
>are likely to lose their hosting/affiliate account, as well as their
>Usenet access account.
>
Without wishing to be *too* controversial, or to side with spliffing,
*why* cant you put up such a FAQ? It holds as much validity as the
'original' - in other words, *some* members of this group chose it,
others didnt, and we are in an *alt. group where 'normal' rules dont
necessarily apply
| |
| Red E. Kilowatt 2007-02-17, 6:21 pm |
| nullified <null@null.null> wrote in message:
0meet2pe0339vj2dn9ukneod9vcokvvpnn@4ax.com,
> On 17 Feb 2007 13:00:59 GMT, Kim André Akerĝ
> <kimandre@NOSPAMbetadome.com> wrote:
>
> Without wishing to be *too* controversial, or to side with spliffing,
> *why* cant you put up such a FAQ? It holds as much validity as the
> 'original' - in other words, *some* members of this group chose it,
> others didnt, and we are in an *alt. group where 'normal' rules dont
> necessarily apply
Any FAQ is only as valid as the level of support it has within the
group.
--
Red
| |
|
| > I tried the term Kyokushinkai (a form of karate) and a web site I run
> http://www.dunmowkarate.co.uk and I got places 3 and 4 on the list.
> I received this message from the webpage that anoyingly popped up :
> "Undoubtedly, Your URL appears overestimated. You need more backlinks.
> Improve your SEO and don't miss the target ! " and there was me thinking
> that positions 3rd and 4th was pretty good!
Have a look at the section "Can I get the SEO Graal ?" in the "url" tab :
you are threatened. 3rd & 4th places are pretty good, but are you sure
you'll still be there next month ? You need more backlinks if you want to
stay in the top 10.
... thanks gnoztik ;-)
> I also find the fact that you have to hit the start button after filling
> out the form a PITA.
it's in debate inside the team.
William Linson
(GnoZtiK Webmaster)
| |
| Matt Probert 2007-02-19, 6:18 pm |
| On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:51:17 +0100, "at" <w i l l i a m . l i n s o n
(at) g n o z t i k . c o m> wrote:
>
>it's in debate inside the team.
That should be "it's under debate within the team"
(realising that you want help with translations)
Matt
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|