Webmaster forum - FRAUD Alert - SMARTECH HOMES, INC.

Author

FRAUD Alert - SMARTECH HOMES, INC.

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 6:21 pm

We believe that any web developer should adhere to a minimum business
ethical standards in order to obtain the needed trust from customers.
Any person advertising himself as a webmaster while acting in a
dishonest manner is very damaging for the reputation of webmasters in
general.
For that reason, we believe it is our duty, to let you and the rest of
the world know that the member of this Group named Jerry Stuckle, who
is the owner of the web site at;
http://www.smartechhomes.com
is cheating on people with the unequivocally purpose of committing
FRAUD.

WHOIS information for http://www.smartechhomes.com

Registrant:
SMARTECH HOMES, INC.
9920 BRIXTON LANE
Bethesda, Maryland 20817-1501
United States

Administrative Contact:
Stucle, Jerry jstuckle@attglobal.net
SMARTECH HOMES, INC.
9920 BRIXTON LANE
Bethesda, Maryland 20817-1501
United States
3014696605 Fax --

Jerry Stuckle was the principal of SMARTECH HOMES, INC. which has been
forfeited last year by the Maryland Taxpayer Services Division.

Entity Name: SMARTECH HOMES, INC.
Dept ID #: D07297567

Principal Office (Current): 9920 BRIXTON LANE, BETHESDA, MD 20817
Resident Agent (Current): JERRY D. STUCKLE, 9920 BRIXTON LANE,
BETHESDA, MD 20817

DEPT. ACTION - FORFEITURE 10/06/2006 12:03-AM
THE ENTITY WAS FORFEITED FOR FAILURE TO FILE PROPERTY RETURN FOR 2005.
For a Maryland entity, its existence has been ended by the State for
some delinquency.

Good Standing: No

However, more than a year after, Jerry Stuckle, showing a deplorable
lack of business ethics, stills maintains and deploys the website,
claiming to belong to a reputable company and offering all kinds of
products and services
If you have purchased any products or services from these fraudulent
pages or have been approached by Jerry Stuckle in any way to offer you
any kind of commercial transaction involving this fake company after
10/06/2006, you have most likely been the victim of a FRAUD.
You can report this crime by writing to the Federal Trade Commission
or contacting your State Attorneys General:
http://www.consumerfraudreporting.o...generallist.php
Your state Attorney General or local office of consumer protection is
also listed in the government pages of your telephone book.

If you have fallen victim of a Phishing scam originated at any other
of the fake Jerry Stuckler's pages, such as the one at:
http://www.icca.org/member/memberpage.asp?id=400
you can report it at the Consumer Fraud Reporting website:
http://www.consumerfraudreporting.org/

Any kind of Internet Fraud that might have been committed by Jerry
Stuckler can be reported by contacting the U.S. government's Internet
Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at:
http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/

You may also contact the FBI Internet Fraud Complaint Center
http://www.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp

If you are approached by Jerry Stuckler, please don't give out any
financial information, such as checking account and credit card
numbers; and especially your social Security number.

NEVER buy anything from a company that is listed as forfeited, as
Jerry Stuckler's are. Don't even visit his Phishing and Spoofed
websites or ask for more information.
It is like feeding a stray cat. Give it one morsel of food, and it
will be there all the time.

We're sorry to have to be the ones to tell you all this, but the
bottom line is, if you want to secure your hard-earned money, then you
better have your feet on the ground, and don't let yourself be cheated
by the likes of Jerry Stuckler.

Be aware also that Jerry Stuckler usually targets unaware uneducated
people, since there's no way that his scams can be successfully
applied on more resourceful people for obvious reasons.

Thank you for your attention.

Harlan Messinger

2007-11-16, 6:21 pm

1001 Webs wrote:
> We believe that any web developer should adhere to a minimum business
> ethical standards in order to obtain the needed trust from customers.
> Any person advertising himself as a webmaster while acting in a
> dishonest manner is very damaging for the reputation of webmasters in
> general.
> For that reason, we believe it is our duty, to let you and the rest of
> the world know that the member of this Group named Jerry Stuckle,

I've have never seen this person in comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
before, so kindly keep this garbage out of here.

[fu to alt.usenet.kooks]

SpaceGirl

2007-11-16, 6:21 pm

1001 Webs wrote:

<snip possibly libelous stuff>

Hello killfile :D

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 6:22 pm

On Nov 16, 10:57 pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
>
> I've have never seen this person in comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
> before, so kindly keep this garbage out of here.

Sorry, we thought that garbage person had tried to inflict his FRAUD
schemes on your Group too as he's done on so many.

Lucky you !!!

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 6:22 pm

On Nov 16, 11:05 pm, SpaceGirl <nothespacegirls...@subhuman.net>
wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
>
> <snip possibly libelous stuff>
It's all there. No libel at all.
All has been proved beyond reasonable doubt.

You didn't object however when Criminal Jerry wrongfully libeled us.
How strange...

> Hello killfile :D
Bye SpaceGirl, Nice to meet you, really.
Regards to your girlfriend.
Is she the inspiration of your designs?

Red E. Kilowatt

2007-11-16, 6:22 pm

1001 Webs <1001webs@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in message:
b39aee2c-26f6-4f25-9f45-0e56bff20a32@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,

> For that reason, we believe it is our duty,

<snippage>

I am quite familiar with how this particular type of mental illness
manifests itself, which is why I have so little tolerance for it. There
are those who can magnify a real or perceived slight into monumental
proportions in their own minds and they become obsessed stalkers who
will set out to systematically destroy someone's reputation and their
business in order to "get even."

The regs here can have their differences and get into a pissing match
from time to time, but when something like this happens, we should all
shun the miscreant.

--
Red

Steve Sobol

2007-11-16, 6:22 pm

On 2007-11-16, 1001 Webs <1001webs@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:

>
> Sorry, we thought that garbage person had tried to inflict his FRAUD
> schemes on your Group too as he's done on so many.

In English: "I wanted to act like a whiny little child in as many newsgroups
as possible."

Just consider yourself lucky he doesn't continually post his lies in your
newsgroup as he does in a.w.w.

--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol

freemont

2007-11-16, 6:22 pm

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:37:17 -0800, 1001 Webs writ:

> We believe that any web developer should adhere to a minimum business
> ethical standards in order to obtain the needed trust from
> customers.blahblahblah

Enough already.

<PLONK>

--
"Because all you of Earth are idiots!"
¯`·..·¯`·-> freemont <-·¯`·..·¯

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

On Nov 17, 12:03 am, Steve Sobol <sjso...@JustThe.net> wrote:
> On 2007-11-16, 1001 Webs <1001w...@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:
>
>
>
> In English: "I wanted to act like a whiny little child in as many newsgroups
> as possible."
I'm getting a bit confused.
Who are you talking about ? Jerry, right?

I don't know if you, Steve, or any of you have come to realize that at
this point this is not a game anymore.
It ceased to be anything similar to a game the moment that Jerry
accused us of "scammers", "lacking business ethics", "not to be
trusted", etc. for the "world to know".
plus posting what he thought were my personal details.

You have absolutely no right to complain now if you didn't complain
then.

> Just consider yourself lucky he doesn't continually post his lies in your
> newsgroup as he does in a.w.w.

Now, that's what I call a libel.

Please, have a look at the "hard-working" libelist website:
www.SteveSobol.com
and tell me if I should ever waste my time trying to open his eyes ...

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

On Nov 17, 12:01 am, "Red E. Kilowatt" <spamt...@aww-faq.org> wrote:
> 1001 Webs <1001w...@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in message:
>
> b39aee2c-26f6-4f25-9f45-0e56bff20...@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
>
>
> <snippage>
>
> I am quite familiar with how this particular type of mental illness
> manifests itself, which is why I have so little tolerance for it.
You are a pathological lier, Red.
If you're quite familiar with this particular type of mental illness
it can only be for two reasons:
1- You suffer it yourself.
2- You know someone (perhaps Jerry?) who does.
In any of those cases you'd have a great deal of tolerance.
See how easy is to uncover your lies.?
Let me also tell you that your posts are getting weirder every time.
You should have yourself checked.

> There
> are those who can magnify a real or perceived slight into monumental
> proportions in their own minds and they become obsessed stalkers who
> will set out to systematically destroy someone's reputation and their
> business in order to "get even."
Sure, sure, Red.
Now, get a glass of hot milk, put the blanket over your shoulders and
just relax.

> The regs here can have their differences and get into a pissing match
> from time to time, but when something like this happens, we should all
> shun the miscreant.
I agree.
Pity you didn't realize what has been going on during all this time.
It had to be me the one that uncovered the FRAUD SCAM.
No please, don't thank me, I do it for the general community interest.
I believe in decency, you see?
You also do, right Red?

WindsorFox

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

1001 Webs wrote:
> We believe that any web developer should adhere to a minimum business
> ethical standards in order to obtain the needed trust from customers.
> Any person advertising himself as a webmaster while acting in a
> dishonest manner is very damaging for the reputation of webmasters in
> general.

*We* believe that you are a lying jackass that is full of crap.
You're also a spammer.

--
"I get the impression that Jamie is a papusa or two short of a
combination plate." - Kent Wills

"A lot of Southeast Oregon appears to be low resolution
even when you are physically driving through it! - Uncle Bob

Steve Sobol

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

["Followup-To:" header set to alt.www.webmaster.]
On 2007-11-16, 1001 Webs <1001webs@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:

> I'm getting a bit confused.
> Who are you talking about ? Jerry, right?

No, I'm talking about you lying.

While Jerry and I have had our differences at times, I trust him one hell of
a lot more than I trust you. People that jump on Usenet posting to a half-
dozen or more newsgroups that X is a fraud, continually and repeatedly posting
said claims and getting in the faces of those that argue against the claims,
are usually full of crap. If I have actual questions related to webdev, I can
ask them here and Jerry, among others, is often able to give cogent, accurate,
professional answers.

> It ceased to be anything similar to a game the moment that Jerry
> accused us of "scammers", "lacking business ethics", "not to be
> trusted", etc. for the "world to know".

Oh, and that is SO much better than your claims about him. I didn't see the
post you are referring to. Perhaps give me a Message ID so I can find it on
Google?

>
> Now, that's what I call a libel.

Heh. :)

> Please, have a look at the "hard-working" libelist website:
> www.SteveSobol.com

Because there's nothing there? :) Yeah, go look, it's just an under-
construction page. Whatever.

You DO lie. You keep calling me a spammer. I don't post the same
irrelevant crap to multiple newsgroups at once; that's the definition of
Usenet spamming; go look it up. Putting links in your signature isn't spamming
either, go look that up too, it's been true for decades.

I don't believe any of your claims about Jerry, either. If he was such a
horrible person, why didn't you just take the appropriate legal action a long
time ago instead of carping at him here, now? My guess is that you've done
absolutely nothing because your claims aren't actually true. And they're
serious claims that could get you into a lot of trouble if you pursued them
with the authorities.

--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

On Nov 17, 1:03 am, WindsorFox <windsorfo...@SPAMcox.net> wrote:
> 1001 Webs wrote:
>
> *We* believe that you are a lying jackass that is full of crap.
> You're also a spammer.

No you don't.
Speak for yourself in any case, mindless parrot.

1001 Webs

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

On Nov 17, 1:43 am, Steve Sobol <sjso...@JustThe.net> wrote:
> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.www.webmaster.]
> On 2007-11-16, 1001 Webs <1001w...@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:
>
>
> No, I'm talking about you lying.
>
> While Jerry and I have had our differences at times, I trust him one hell of
> a lot more than I trust you. People that jump on Usenet posting to a half-
> dozen or more newsgroups that X is a fraud, continually and repeatedly posting
> said claims and getting in the faces of those that argue against the claims,
> are usually full of crap.
Then Jerry is full of crap, because that's exactly what he did.

> If I have actual questions related to webdev, I can
> ask them here and Jerry, among others, is often able to give cogent, accurate,
> professional answers.
Are we talking about the same Jerry?

>
> Oh, and that is SO much better than your claims about him.
You seem to *forget* that it was him who started

> I didn't see the
> post you are referring to. Perhaps give me a Message ID so I can find it on
> Google?
Look at his profile:
http://groups.google.com/groups/pro...H1-9oWMCTqaiMrA
and search for "scammers", "lacking business ethics", "not to be
trusted", etc. for the "world to know".
among many others ...

>
>
> Heh. :)
It is Steve.
libel:
"a publication without justification or lawful excuse which is
calculated to injure the reputation of another by exposing him to
hatred, contempt or ridicule."

And what Jerry did is defamation:
"In law, defamation is the communication of a statement that makes a
false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may harm
the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government
or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or
criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against
criticism."

And what I did was exposing the Truth.

>
> Because there's nothing there? :) Yeah, go look, it's just an under-
> construction page. Whatever.
It did piss you off, did it?
How does it feel?
Live up to your words and don't try to retaliate now ...

> You DO lie. You keep calling me a spammer. I don't post the same
> irrelevant crap to multiple newsgroups at once; that's the definition of
> Usenet spamming; go look it up. Putting links in your signature isn't spamming
> either, go look that up too, it's been true for decades.
I know Steve, I know.
Calm down, I'm sorry, ok?

> I don't believe any of your claims about Jerry, either. If he was such a
> horrible person, why didn't you just take the appropriate legal action a long
> time ago instead of carping at him here, now?
Because is cheaper to post his wrongdoings here, more effective and
more fun.
And that's what he deserves.
I'm giving him a taste of his own medicine.

> My guess is that you've done
> absolutely nothing because your claims aren't actually true. And they're
> serious claims that could get you into a lot of trouble if you pursued them
> with the authorities.

If you had bothered to follow the links I've posted to Maryland
Judiciary and Maryland Taxpayer Services Division you would have found
out by yourself that everything I've posted is absolutely true.

And everything he posted about me and my company are plain defamations
for which he's going to get in a lot of trouble.

Steve Sobol

2007-11-16, 10:16 pm

On 2007-11-17, 1001 Webs <1001webs@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:

> It did piss you off, did it?

Nah. I'm amused you're making such a big deal of it.

[color=darkred]
> I know Steve, I know.
> Calm down, I'm sorry, ok?

I don't believe you're sorry.

> Because is cheaper to post his wrongdoings here, more effective and
> more fun.

But if he's really a criminal, if he's REALLY done what you claim,
he should be turned in.

> And everything he posted about me and my company are plain defamations
> for which he's going to get in a lot of trouble.

Whatever. I still don't believe you.

--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol

Viper

2007-11-17, 3:16 am

This spamming k00ks info...
Contact them all and let them know about this spamming loser.

1001webs.net
Rafael Martinez-Minuesa Martinez (info@1001webs.net)
+34.620443347
Fax:
Puerto Marina
Benalmadena, MALAGA 29630
ES

His Host...
rima-tde.net

His host...
siteground.com/atrack.php?referrerid=28630
siteground148.com
Mihail Ivanov (mivanov@siteground.com)
+1.8008289231
Fax: +1.8662278564
5715 Will Clayton #3712
Humble, TX 77338
US

CJ.com affilate domains he is spamming for...
jdoqocy.com/click-2452585-10444268
anrdoezrs.net/click-2452585-10365615
dpbolvw.net/click-2452585-10479851

Other sites he is spamming for...

phpcoin.com
7dana.com
template-help.com/chat/index.php?referer=www.1001webs.net

1001 Webs

2007-11-17, 6:15 am

On Nov 17, 4:38 am, "Viper" <ven...@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:
> This spamming k00ks info...
> Contact them all and let them know about this spamming loser.
>
> 1001webs.net
> Rafael Martinez-Minuesa Martinez (i...@1001webs.net)
> +34.620443347
> Fax:
> Puerto Marina
> Benalmadena, MALAGA 29630
> ES
>
> His Host...
> rima-tde.net
>
> His host...
> siteground.com/atrack.php?referrerid=28630
> siteground148.com
> Mihail Ivanov (miva...@siteground.com)
> +1.8008289231
> Fax: +1.8662278564
> 5715 Will Clayton #3712
> Humble, TX 77338
> US
>
> CJ.com affilate domains he is spamming for...
> jdoqocy.com/click-2452585-10444268
> anrdoezrs.net/click-2452585-10365615
> dpbolvw.net/click-2452585-10479851
>
> Other sites he is spamming for...
>
> phpcoin.com
> 7dana.com
> template-help.com/chat/index.php?referer=www.1001webs.net

Thank you Viper !!!
Most appreciated, there was one element missing in my demand and now
is complete !!!

ROLFMAO !

Brendan Gillatt

2007-11-17, 6:18 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

1001 Webs wrote:
> On Nov 17, 1:03 am, WindsorFox <windsorfo...@SPAMcox.net> wrote:
>
> No you don't.
> Speak for yourself in any case, mindless parrot.

Actually I'm pretty sure that not a single person that reads this group
agrees with you. For you to gain trust on usenet you must show willing to
co-operate and relate to people in a polite way. Until you realise that
you will get _no-where_. People will neither trust nor believe you.

Do yourself a favour and socialise properly.

- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHPu5AkA9dCbrNdDMRAnUjAKDKn85+z7hUDkhwMxwWL4Q1NXGXkACgoIdg
srTm5A5qgcVVnXba4HXvOXA=
=o8r2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

WindsorFox

2007-11-17, 6:18 pm

Steve Sobol wrote:

>
> I don't believe you're sorry.
>

No, I think he is, really, really sorry...

--
"I get the impression that Jamie is a papusa or two short of a
combination plate." - Kent Wills

"A lot of Southeast Oregon appears to be low resolution
even when you are physically driving through it! - Uncle Bob

Geoff Berrow

2007-11-18, 6:17 pm

Message-ID: <WvGdnRQqBNC2c6PanZ2dnUVZ8t_inZ2d@pipex.net> from Brendan
Gillatt contained the following:

>
>Actually I'm pretty sure that not a single person that reads this group
>agrees with you.

They probably agree with him by email...
--
Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011

Doug Baiter

2007-11-23, 3:28 am

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:01:27 -0800, "Red E. Kilowatt"
<spamtrap@aww-faq.org> wrote:

>1001 Webs <1001webs@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in message:
>b39aee2c-26f6-4f25-9f45-0e56bff20a32@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
>
>
><snippage>
>
>I am quite familiar with how this particular type of mental illness
>manifests itself, which is why I have so little tolerance for it.

Because you've suffered from it for years...

>There
>are those who can magnify a real or perceived slight into monumental
>proportions in their own minds and they become obsessed stalkers who
>will set out to systematically destroy someone's reputation and their
>business in order to "get even."
>
As you've attempted to do to posters for years?

>The regs here can have their differences and get into a pissing match
>from time to time, but when something like this happens, we should all
>shun the miscreant.

What a pity that there are still some here who are blinkered as to
what YOU still do everyday, huh, otherwise you might find yourself in
that shun position. Still, at least you're remaining true to form, by
begging others to ignore someone who disagrees with you in the hope
that they might go away!

PS. Not that anyone cares, but I'll point out that I've not posted
ANYTHING to or about Red for just under a month (while I was sunning
myself under a palm tree :o). Would have been more than happy to let
bygones be bygones and move along with AWW, but on getting home I saw
he's still maintaining his libellous hate sites about me and others.