| Author |
StumbleUpon Summary - 1 day
|
|
| Karl Groves 2006-08-15, 6:38 pm |
| After reading the threads about StumbleUpon, I decided yesterday (late
morning) to register. I then added some sites to my favorites. I chose to
add sites that are pretty different from each other in terms of content and
traffic. Here are the 1 day results.
www.karlcore.com - avg visits per day: 236; Visits yesterday: 349
(pageviews more than doubled) - 1 person added this to their favorites
www.precisionchassis.com - avg. visits per day: 22; Visits yesterday: 47
(pageviews only increased slightly, though)
www.neorescue.net - avg. visits per day: 266; Visits yesterday: 374
(pageviews rose correspondingly)
www.grayscalecms.com - avg. visits per day: 71; Visits yesterday: 194
(pageviews rose correspondingly) - 3 people added this to their favorites
www.webaccessstrategies.com - avg. visits per day:14 ; Visits yesterday:
175 (page views rose correspondingly)
Lastly, there are two almost-brand-new sites:
www.indiehandbook.com - avg. visits per day: 4; Visits yesterday: 34 (page
views are actually down, however)
www.belladolcemastini.com - avg. visits per day: 41; Visits yesterday: 131
(pageviews are actually down)
I will report back in 2 weeks to see if the traffic stays or dies back to
where it was
--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com
| |
|
| On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:33:16 -0500, Karl Groves
<karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> scrawled:
> After reading the threads about StumbleUpon, I decided yesterday (late
> morning) to register. I then added some sites to my favorites. I chose to
> add sites that are pretty different from each other in terms of content and
> traffic. Here are the 1 day results.
Interesting info.
Only problem with the long-term test is that you may see a spike today
from people reading aww who are curious what the sites are.
--
MGW (Note: my Hotmail address is seldom checked)
Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even
when you take into account Hofstadter's Law. - Douglas Hofstadter
| |
| sir robert blake 2006-08-15, 6:38 pm |
| bloddy ell Karl, that's great new angle for spamming!
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-08-16, 6:57 am |
| MGW <mgw1979@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:eil3e29p2jhh6g79ov6rdedsp6geitvha1@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:33:16 -0500, Karl Groves
> <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> scrawled:
>
>
> Interesting info.
>
> Only problem with the long-term test is that you may see a spike today
> from people reading aww who are curious what the sites are.
>
My CMS counts the number of referrals from each source. A typical day is
80-90 unique visitors. I had something like 110 +/- referrals from SU the
first day, and about 50 yesterday; also double page views and 3 fans. Old
folk like me :) I like the community that's sprung up and I also plan to
spend some time giving back as much as I'm getting. I've found some
awesome websites based on my prefs that I never would have found on my own.
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Deep Purple - Smoke On The Water: http://tinyurl.com/g7nnu
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
|
|
|
|
| Karl Groves 2006-08-16, 6:58 am |
| TechnoHippie <technohippiechick@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in
news:44e2c749$0$30201$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
> I also plan to spend some time giving back as much as I'm getting.
> I've found some awesome websites based on my prefs that I never would
> have found on my own.
Very true. My own SU bookmarks are growing quite rapidly as I've found tons
of really great new sites, too.
--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com
| |
| Karl Groves 2006-08-16, 6:58 am |
| TechnoHippie <technohippiechick@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in news:44e2dd72$0$30222
$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
> Karl Groves <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote in
> news:Xns98206131517DFkarlkarlcorecom@216.196.97.136:
>
>
> Have you seen this yet?
> http://stumbleupon.wikia.com/wiki/StumbleUpon_Wiki
No, I hadn't. Thanks for sharing
--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| Karl Groves <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote in
news:Xns961377A18DBCkarlkarlcorecom@216.196.97.136:
> No, I hadn't. Thanks for sharing
NP
Profile stuff ... INFP ... same as the last dozen times I've taken the BMPT
over the last umpteen years. Yes, it proves I'm a bleeding heart :)
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Deep Purple - Smoke On The Water: http://tinyurl.com/g7nnu
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| Karl Groves 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| TechnoHippie <technohippiechick@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in
news:44e300f1$0$30207$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
> Karl Groves <karl@NOSPAMkarlcore.com> wrote in
> news:Xns961377A18DBCkarlkarlcorecom@216.196.97.136:
>
>
> NP
> Profile stuff ... INFP ... same as the last dozen times I've taken the
> BMPT over the last umpteen years. Yes, it proves I'm a bleeding heart
> :)
>
It sure does!
You'd be surprised at how amazing I am at guessing people's archetypes.
I'm actually an XNTP, but they didn't have the X listed (I don't blame
them. It would have littered the listings too much to have all those X's as
options.)
I'm exactly 50/50 between E/I, but 100% an NT, and a strong P.
--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com
| |
| GreyWyvern 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| And lo, Karl Groves didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
> TechnoHippie <technohippiechick@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:
>
>
> It sure does!
> You'd be surprised at how amazing I am at guessing people's archetypes.
Oh? Shall we wager a Guinness on that? :)
> I'm actually an XNTP, but they didn't have the X listed (I don't blame
> them. It would have littered the listings too much to have all those X's
> as options.)
>
> I'm exactly 50/50 between E/I, but 100% an NT, and a strong P.
I'm only quite decided in one scale, the other three measurements were all
within 10 points of 50/50. I guess that makes it a little more dangerous.
So? Make a guess.
Grey
--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollary that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com/orca#search - Orca Search: Full-featured
spider and site-search engine
| |
| sir robert blake 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| Karl Groves:
> You'd be surprised at how amazing I am at guessing people's
> archetypes.
you're just an amazing guy, Karl.
And modest with it.
| |
| Karl Groves 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| GreyWyvern <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote in
news:op.tedpyqu4sl6xfd@news.nas.net:
> And lo, Karl Groves didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
>
>
> Oh? Shall we wager a Guinness on that? :)
>
>
> I'm only quite decided in one scale, the other three measurements were
> all within 10 points of 50/50. I guess that makes it a little more
> dangerous.
>
> So? Make a guess.
>
Of course, I could simply dive towards one that is very common, but I'll
make a guess:
INFJ
I'm guessing that you're iffy on the I, the F, and the J
--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com
| |
| GreyWyvern 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| And lo, Karl Groves didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
> GreyWyvern <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote:
>
>
> Of course, I could simply dive towards one that is very common, but I'll
> make a guess:
>
> INFJ
So close :) Although I took the "real" test so many years ago, all the
online tests still confirm that I am INFP.
> I'm guessing that you're iffy on the I, the F, and the J
You may be surprised to know that I am a very strong "I". It's the N, F
and P which hover about the midpoint.
No Guinness for you!
Grey
--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollary that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com/orca#search - Orca Search: Full-featured
spider and site-search engine
| |
| Karl Groves 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| GreyWyvern <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote in
news:op.tedtzjwusl6xfd@news.nas.net:
> And lo, Karl Groves didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
>
>
> So close :) Although I took the "real" test so many years ago, all
> the online tests still confirm that I am INFP.
>
>
> You may be surprised to know that I am a very strong "I". It's the N,
> F and P which hover about the midpoint.
>
> No Guinness for you!
>
Ya gotta admit I was super close!
BTW: you say "I am a very strong 'I'". You're not agoraphobic, are you?
;-)
--
Karl Groves
www.karlcore.com
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| GreyWyvern <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote in
news:op.tedtzjwusl6xfd@news.nas.net:
>
> You may be surprised to know that I am a very strong "I". It's the N,
> F and P which hover about the midpoint.
Nitpickers ...
I=73.53 N=67.57 F=61.76 P=57.14
I could have answered MORE honestly and tipped that "I" scale right over
into the psychic realm.
INFP - "Questor". High capacity for caring. Emotional face to the world.
High sense of honor derived from internal values. 4.4% of total population.
Funny ... we don't LOOK like two peas in a pod.
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Deep Purple - Smoke On The Water: http://tinyurl.com/g7nnu
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| GreyWyvern 2006-08-16, 6:40 pm |
| And lo, TechnoHippie didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
> GreyWyvern <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote:
>
,[color=darkred]
>
> Nitpickers ...
>
> I=3D73.53 N=3D67.57 F=3D61.76 P=3D57.14
> I could have answered MORE honestly and tipped that "I" scale right ov=
er
> into the psychic realm.
Mine are along the lines of (guessing): I=3D85%, N=3D57%, F=3D51%, P=3D5=
8%
I remember clearly that F was very close. Depending on the online test =
I =
take, I can slip over into T.
> INFP - "Questor". High capacity for caring. Emotional face to the worl=
d.
> High sense of honor derived from internal values. 4.4% of total =
> population.
Because of the ambiguity of my scores, I don't really pay attention to t=
he =
"final assessment" the various test try to foist upon you. I'm =
iconoclastic if anything ;)
Interestingly enough, when I play online games, I do tend to take the =
"healer" role...
> Funny ... we don't LOOK like two peas in a pod.
What's funny is that people look to a personality test to define and =
categorize them. What meaning do the scores have but the most superfici=
al =
look at who you really are?
Grey
-- =
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the =
pitfall corollary that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com/orca#search - Orca Search: Full-featured =
spider and site-search engine
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-08-17, 6:41 am |
| GreyWyvern <spam@greywyvern.com> wrote in
news:op.tedxwra5sl6xfd@news.nas.net:
> What's funny is that people look to a personality test to define and
> categorize them.
Nah, I already knew all that stuff about me from an early age. It's only
fun if the shoe fits ... kinda like reading your horrorscope and relating
to the message. All the insight crafts are founded on the practitioner's
intuitive capabilities. Interpretation is designed to be subjective, Tests
only tell us what we know about ourselves and gives everyone a common
terminology.
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Bob Saget's Best Friends: http://tinyurl.com/rup89 NSFW!!!
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |