| Author |
Excellent A+ web host 80GB space, 1110GB transfer.
|
|
| Ceril Takao 2006-07-10, 7:18 pm |
| Hi,
I'll try to say this without making it sound like an ad.
I stumbled up this hosting service which I think is awesome and you all
might be interested!
You get 75GB of space, but with the coupon code below you can get an
extra 5GB!
Secret Code: CUST21193
They provide 1110 GB of bandwidth which is basically unlimited.
They support PHP, MySQL, Pop3, Domain hosting and transfer all in their
neat service.
I really recommend them because I've been with them for a while now
and they are still standing strong.
Check them out; I know you'll love it!
http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust21193
Cheers,
Ceril.
| |
|
| Ceril Takao wrote:
> I'll try to say this without making it sound like an ad.
Didn't work.
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
| |
|
|
|
|
| Charles Sweeney 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| Ceril Takao wrote
[color=darkred]
> Ha ha, well..
> I still recommend them ^_^.
>
> William Tasso wrote:
You lost two points, but you got one of them back, spammers rarely post a
reply!
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
| |
| Eric Jarvis 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| Ceril Takao ceril.takao@XXXXXXXXXX wrote in
<1151567969.841754.253020@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
> Ha ha, well..
> I still recommend them ^_^.
>
You also top post, which puts the recommendation in perspective.
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"
| |
| Cynode 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:40:15 +0100, Eric Jarvis
<eric@ericjarvis.co.uk> wrote:
>Ceril Takao ceril.takao@XXXXXXXXXX wrote in
><1151567969.841754.253020@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
I'm going to middle post, just to be confusing. Also I recommend the
moose! =)
[color=darkred]
>You also top post, which puts the recommendation in perspective.
--
If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger.
~Frank Lloyd Wright - http://www.cynode.com
| |
|
| I too prefer top posting.
That way the most recent post is at the top and easy to read..
Old shell guy.......
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:40:15 +0100, Eric Jarvis <eric@ericjarvis.co.uk> wrote:
>Ceril Takao ceril.takao@XXXXXXXXXX wrote in
><1151567969.841754.253020@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
>
>You also top post, which puts the recommendation in perspective.
| |
| GreyWyvern 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| And lo, Henry didst speak in alt.www.webmaster:
> I too prefer top posting.
> That way the most recent post is at the top and easy to read..
>
> Old shell guy.......
Which would be okay, but not everyone reads messages from USENET in
context. And as you know, context (or anything, really) is easier to read
when it flows properly from top to bottom. In addition to this,
bottom-posting is the mutually accepted means of posting in this
particular group; YMMV in other groups in which you may participate.
Grey
--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollary that nothing is ridiculous.
- http://www.greywyvern.com/orca#search - Orca Search: Full-featured
spider and site-search engine
| |
|
| I sometimes trim the whole lot!
It's a reaction to those who bottom-post, but refuse to snip any of the last
37 items in the thread...
I also, I'm not sure that I agree that the OP wasn't a spammer based on the
fact that he replied. He's still a spammer, just a focused, small-scale
spammer...
CJM
| |
| Paul Watt 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
|
"CJM" <cjmnews04@REMOVEMEyahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4gi7b1F1n1kmgU1@individual.net...
>I sometimes trim the whole lot!
>
> It's a reaction to those who bottom-post, but refuse to snip any of the
> last 37 items in the thread...
>
> I also, I'm not sure that I agree that the OP wasn't a spammer based on
> the fact that he replied. He's still a spammer, just a focused,
> small-scale spammer...
>
> CJM
Then its hard for newcomers to the thread to see what your refering to.
--
Cheers
Paul
http://www.paulwatt.info
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| "Ceril Takao" <ceril.takao@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote in
news:1151567969.841754.253020@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> Ha ha, well..
> I still recommend them ^_^.
Of course you do with a referral code you'll profit from. Where did you
get the idea that webmasters are stupid?
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Let's Impeach The President: http://tinyurl.com/eoagh
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| Henry <NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:0do7a2d7o9dpvu0tvaghkbdu6fvs8aqeuv@4ax.com:
> I too prefer top posting.
> That way the most recent post is at the top and easy to read..
So, what you're saying is that you don't care if your posts get read in
this newsgroup? This is an old battle. By consensus, this group agrees to
bottom-post for context. Comply or be relegated to a multitude of bozo
bins. Your choice :)
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Let's Impeach The President: http://tinyurl.com/eoagh
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| David Cary Hart 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:53:33 +0100, "William Tasso"
<SpamBlocked@tbdata.com> opined:
> Fleeing from the madness of the http://groups.google.com jungle
> Ceril Takao <ceril.takao@XXXXXXXXXX> stumbled into
> news:alt.www.webmaster and said:
>
>
> failed - next.
>
Not to mention that the ping times are awful.
--
Displayed Email Address is a SPAM TRAP
Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com
Don't Subsidize Criminals" http://boulderpledge.org
| |
|
| Ceril Takao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll try to say this without making it sound like an ad.
> I stumbled up this hosting service which I think is awesome and you
> all might be interested!
> You get 75GB of space, but with the coupon code below you can get an
> extra 5GB!
> Secret Code: CUST21193
>
> They provide 1110 GB of bandwidth which is basically unlimited.
> They support PHP, MySQL, Pop3, Domain hosting and transfer all in
> their neat service.
>
> I really recommend them because I've been with them for a while now
> and they are still standing strong.
>
> Check them out; I know you'll love it!
> http://www. servage.net /?coupon =cust21193
>
> Cheers,
> Ceril.
Spammer.
| |
| Matt Probert 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| On 29 Jun 2006 17:59:27 GMT, TechnoHippie
<technohippiechick@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:
>So, what you're saying is that you don't care if your posts get read in
>this newsgroup? This is an old battle. By consensus, this group agrees to
>bottom-post for context. Comply or be relegated to a multitude of bozo
>bins. Your choice :)
Judy? Recommending people to comply?
Gosh!
Matt
--
A comprehensive who's who of the world's mythologies.
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/mythology.htm
| |
|
| Whatz rong wit top posting?
I suppose you think all garage doors should be on the left, or
everyone should drink whole milk.
[color=darkred]
>On 29 Jun 2006 17:59:27 GMT, TechnoHippie
><technohippiechick@XXXXXXXXXX> wrote:
>
| |
| Jerry Stuckle 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| Earl wrote:[color=darkred]
> Whatz rong wit top posting?
>
> I suppose you think all garage doors should be on the left, or
> everyone should drink whole milk.
>
>
>
>
A. Bozos
Q. What are people who insist on top posting knows as?
A. It make following the thread much harder.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
A. Top posting.
Q. What's the most annoying thing on usenet?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
| |
| TechnoHippie 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| Earl <NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:gt2aa2lr4c5i2tu183v5smilmq2vh94dhr@4ax.com:
[color=darkred]
> Whatz rong wit top posting?
>
> I suppose you think all garage doors should be on the left, or
> everyone should drink whole milk.
A: Because it breaks the context of the post you are replying to.
Q: Why shouldn't I top post?
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a rat's XXX what you do. You obviously
rebel against even the most sincere efforts to help you play well with
others.
Judy
--
Trippy Triangle: http://technohippie.com
Wake Up America!: http://tinyurl.com/z8gal
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
| spamgoeshere4@yahoo.com 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| Viper wrote:
> Ceril Takao wrote:
>
> Spammer.
Maybe, but $7.50 for 80 GB space and 1110 GB bandwidth is not a bad
deal. I don't need 80 GB of space or I would go for it. I prefer a
lower price and a smaller space. But the bandwidth is excellent!
| |
| David Cary Hart 2006-07-10, 7:19 pm |
| On 1 Jul 2006 15:00:39 -0700, spamgoeshere4@yahoo.com opined:
> Maybe, but $7.50 for 80 GB space and 1110 GB bandwidth is not a bad
> deal. I don't need 80 GB of space or I would go for it. I prefer a
> lower price and a smaller space. But the bandwidth is excellent!
>
The transmission limits are irrelevant when the pipe is too narrow.
Based upon the ping times, if you approached that much usage, you
could be trying to shove baseballs through a garden hose.
In simpler terms, they seem to have either a slow connection or too
much contention for what they have, You get what you pay for,
--
Displayed Email Address is a SPAM TRAP
Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com
Don't Subsidize Criminals" http://boulderpledge.org
| |
| spamgoeshere4@yahoo.com 2006-07-10, 7:20 pm |
| David Cary Hart wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2006 15:00:39 -0700, spamgoeshere4@yahoo.com opined:
>
> The transmission limits are irrelevant when the pipe is too narrow.
> Based upon the ping times, if you approached that much usage, you
> could be trying to shove baseballs through a garden hose.
>
> In simpler terms, they seem to have either a slow connection or too
> much contention for what they have, You get what you pay for,
Of course, but that is not to say you can't get good bandwidth for a
low price. Right now I have an unlimited account and am pushing around
200 GB a month for only $60 a year. The plan fits my needs pretty well
right now, but they seem to have some service issues lately. They used
to be great, but over the last year or so they have had intermittant
down times. So I am looking for a similar deal with another provider.
This type of service should keep getting cheaper every year, so it
should be easier to get the same plan than it was when I started with
them nearly three years ago.
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |