This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters  


Home > Archive > Webmaster forum > April 2006 > Very important question about standards





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Very important question about standards
Pawel Zawadzki

2006-04-25, 7:06 pm

Hi

This is stupid question, I know, but why is so immportant making passed
standards www sites.
Meaby there is some articles about it?


Thanks for answers ;)

Best regards
David Dorward

2006-04-25, 7:06 pm

Pawel Zawadzki wrote:

> This is stupid question, I know, but why is so immportant making passed
> standards www sites.


In a nutshell:

1. The code is easier to maintain since the standards are well documented.

2. You don't have to worry about different browsers trying to error correct
for your mistakes in different ways - so its easier to write the code in
the first place.

3. You have a better chance of browsers you don't have access to for testing
handling your code correctly.

4. You have a better chance of browsers that haven't be written yet handling
your code correctly when they are released.

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
Mark Parnell

2006-04-25, 10:58 pm

Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, David Dorward
<dorward@yahoo.com> declared in alt.www.webmaster:

> 1. The code is easier to maintain since the standards are well documented.
>
> 2. You don't have to worry about different browsers trying to error correct
> for your mistakes in different ways - so its easier to write the code in
> the first place.
>
> 3. You have a better chance of browsers you don't have access to for testing
> handling your code correctly.
>
> 4. You have a better chance of browsers that haven't be written yet handling
> your code correctly when they are released.


5. You'll get more help in the relevant newsgroups. :-)

--
Mark Parnell
My Usenet is improved; yours could be too:
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Toby Inkster

2006-04-26, 10:52 pm

David Dorward wrote:

> 3. You have a better chance of browsers you don't have access to for
> testing handling your code correctly.
>
> 4. You have a better chance of browsers that haven't be written yet
> handling your code correctly when they are released.


Isn't #4 a special case of #3?

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact

Sponsored Links


Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com  Software forum  Computer Hardware reviews