This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Webmaster forum > July 2005 > Re: London
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| venomx@gmail.com 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| I love how many in here support terror and wish to have kept Saddam in
power killing MILLIONS of innocent peopel a year. They hate the fact
that the USA and UK stood up to him and removed him from power.
One has to wonder how well their web sites and sales would do if they
went on TV in the UK right now and said they supported the people
blowing up innocent UK'ers the last few days. Would they be brave
enough to give out their home address on live TV? I doubt it.
Nice to see the UK "police" do something right. They told a guy to stop
and he ran off so they caught him and killed the stupid idiot. Even if
it turns out he was innocent they should be given a pat on the back.
I have yet to see any innocent people be killrd in Ieaq except by the
terrorists people like Robert, Chucky, and Matt support. Yes these
losers support the killing of KIDS!!!
If the muslims refuse to stop their fellow muslims from killing
innocent people then start killing them off. Start moving the good
people out. When you have most/only bad ones left nuke! You dont stop a
roach infestation by killing one at a time, you bomb the building!
| |
| venomx@gmail.com 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| He did? LOL I didnt see that. When did he do that?
| |
| venomx@gmail.com 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| Ahh good old Robert the man that supports killing KIDS!
Why do you mark your posts as not to be cached? Scaed your mom or dad
will see them?
| |
| Charles Sweeney 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| wrote
> I love how many in here support terror
Only a handful of Bush supporters that I'm aware of.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
| |
| Charles Sweeney 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| wrote
> Ahh good old Robert the man that supports killing KIDS!
Right now I would wholeheartedly support the killing of you. In fact I
would be at the front of the queue to deliver the fatal blow.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
| |
| Steve Sobol 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| venomx@XXXXXXXXXX wrote:
> I love how many in here support terror and wish to have kept Saddam in
> power killing MILLIONS of innocent peopel a year. They hate the fact
> that the USA and UK stood up to him and removed him from power.
You've said nothing in reply to the people who've pointed out that the Bush
family supported Saddam and bin Laden as business associates in the past.
> Nice to see the UK "police" do something right. They told a guy to stop
> and he ran off so they caught him and killed the stupid idiot. Even if
> it turns out he was innocent they should be given a pat on the back.
XXXXing moron.
See, this is the problem I have with you. YOU support killing innocent
people just to make a point. Killing an innocent person doesn't harm the bad
guys.
--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
| |
| Steve Sobol 2005-07-22, 7:18 pm |
| venomx@XXXXXXXXXX wrote:
> Ahh good old Robert the man that supports killing KIDS!
So what if the innocent person getting shot to death in your scenario... the
one you don't care is innocent... what if he's, say, a fourteen-year-old boy?
--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
| |
| Eric Jarvis 2005-07-23, 4:14 am |
| Steve Sobol sjsobol@JustThe.net wrote in <dbrqq9$16l$1@ratbert.glorb.com>:
>
> See, this is the problem I have with you. YOU support killing innocent
> people just to make a point. Killing an innocent person doesn't harm the bad
> guys.
>
In the view of the suicide bombers killing them doesn't harm them, it
simply makes them martyrs. They've got nothing to lose from anyone being
killed and everything to lose from being made to spend the rest of their
lives kicking their heels in a prison cell after a fair trial.
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"
| |
| Steve Sobol 2005-07-23, 7:14 am |
| Eric Jarvis wrote:
>
> In the view of the suicide bombers killing them doesn't harm them,
I wasn't talking about the suicide bombers.
I was talking about Viper.
Viper has stated clearly and repeatedly that if he nails X terrorists and Y
innocent citizens, it's OK.
I'm assuming that if Y is much bigger than X, it's still OK as far as he's
concerned.
--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
| |
| Eric Jarvis 2005-07-23, 7:14 am |
| Steve Sobol sjsobol@JustThe.net wrote in <dbsrts$5mo$1@ratbert.glorb.com>:
> Eric Jarvis wrote:
>
>
> I wasn't talking about the suicide bombers.
>
> I was talking about Viper.
>
> Viper has stated clearly and repeatedly that if he nails X terrorists and Y
> innocent citizens, it's OK.
>
> I'm assuming that if Y is much bigger than X, it's still OK as far as he's
> concerned.
>
My point is that killing any terrorists is counter productive except where
it's the only way to prevent them killing others, It doesn't matter what
the numbers are. Even if only terrorists are killed it still isn't worth
doing since it just gives them something they want.
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"
| |
| Matt Probert 2005-07-23, 7:14 pm |
| Once upon a time, far far away Eric Jarvis <web@ericjarvis.co.uk>
muttered
>My point is that killing any terrorists is counter productive except where
>it's the only way to prevent them killing others, It doesn't matter what
>the numbers are. Even if only terrorists are killed it still isn't worth
>doing since it just gives them something they want.
And sine "terrorism" is a state of mind, killing terrorists is simply
treating a symptom, not preventing the cause. While it may satisfy the
blood lust of some socially inept jerks, it doesn't prevent more
popping up a bit like cutting one of the heads off the Hydra.
Ergo, sensible, rational governments would examine what causes these
actions, and seek understanding to prevent people becoming so twisted.
If they wanted to stop it of course, which I don't believe for one
minute they do. Blair and Bush have both benefited greatly from recent
events. Why should they kill the golden goose?
Matt
| |
|
|
"Matt Probert" <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> wrote in message
news:42e22807.1998213@news.ntlworld.com...
>
> Ergo, sensible, rational governments
Come again?
I think some of those terms are mutually exclusive.
> would examine what causes these
> actions, and seek understanding to prevent people becoming so twisted.
The problem is some people don't think they are twisted. Which I guess is
the problem.
I agree with the sentiment, but I havn't a clue how we would go about
acheiving it.
> If they wanted to stop it of course, which I don't believe for one
> minute they do. Blair and Bush have both benefited greatly from recent
> events. Why should they kill the golden goose?
Hmmm.... Not a fan then?
| |
| Matt Probert 2005-07-27, 8:19 pm |
| Once upon a time, far far away "CJM" <cjmnew04@REMOVEMEyahoo.co.uk>
muttered
>
>"Matt Probert" <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> wrote in message
>news:42e22807.1998213@news.ntlworld.com...
>
>Come again?
>
>I think some of those terms are mutually exclusive.
<bg> Which is why after being a member of several political parties
during my life I now reject all organised political parties.
>
>
>The problem is some people don't think they are twisted. Which I guess is
>the problem.
Dunno, I think even a Muslim suicide bomber recognises that their
action is pretty extreme. They undoubtedly feel it's justified, and
considering the slaughter in Fallujah I can understand their point of
view, not agree with it (I'm opposed to *all* killing) but understand
where they are coming from.
>
>I agree with the sentiment, but I havn't a clue how we would go about
>acheiving it.
Education. Tolerance and compassion. Unfortunately, global corporate
greed requires the exploitation of the people, and so they turn up the
prpaganda to prevent ordinary Fred Blogs and John Does from seeking
the middle way. Similarly, priests of some religions seeking power
whip up hysteria within their congregations, rather than seeking the
middle way. I think "Frankie Goes To Hollywood" did a song avout it,
except that they naively thought the USSR was after world domination.
>
>
>Hmmm.... Not a fan then?
No. Nor am I a fan of hysterial clerics, priests or Zionists. I am a
fan of Buddhists, Taoists (oxymoron) and Quakers, however.
Matt
| |
|
|
"Matt Probert" <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> wrote in message
news:42e7a786.9359087@news.ntlworld.com...
>
> Education. Tolerance and compassion.
I think we could all do with a little (lot) more of this...
>Similarly, priests of some religions seeking power
> whip up hysteria within their congregations, rather than seeking the
> middle way.
I see where you a re coming from but 'priests' might imply a particular
religion, perhaps.
'Religious leaders'?
>
> No. Nor am I a fan of hysterial clerics, priests or Zionists. I am a
> fan of Buddhists, Taoists (oxymoron) and Quakers, however.
>
Not sure I know enough about those last three, so I'll keep an open mind.
| |
| Matt Probert 2005-07-28, 7:32 pm |
| Once upon a time, far far away "CJM" <cjmnew04@REMOVEMEyahoo.co.uk>
muttered
>
>I see where you a re coming from but 'priests' might imply a particular
>religion, perhaps.
>
>'Religious leaders'?
Perhaps, be they a Cleric or a Pastor, a vicar or a Priestess
>
>
>Not sure I know enough about those last three, so I'll keep an open mind.
>
Thou jests? You must be familiar with Buddhists and Quakers? The
Quakers are often known as "The Society of Friends", suffice to say
they are all pacifists.
Matt
| |
| William Tasso 2005-07-29, 12:03 am |
| Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster
From the safety of the NTL cafeteria
Matt Probert <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> said:
> ...
> must be familiar with Buddhists and Quakers?
no. why? how? I don't know of any distinguishing marks that would
enable identification.
--
William Tasso
** Business as usual
| |
| Blinky the Shark 2005-07-29, 4:17 am |
| Matt Probert wrote:
> Once upon a time, far far away "CJM" <cjmnew04@REMOVEMEyahoo.co.uk>
> muttered
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
> Perhaps, be they a Cleric or a Pastor, a vicar or a Priestess
A puppet, a pauper, a pirate, a poet, a pawn and a king.
[color=darkred]
Hysclericals! :)
--
Blinky Linux Registered User 297263
Killing all Usenet posts from Google Groups
Info: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
*ALSO contains links for access to the NON-BETA GG archive interface*
| |
|
|
"Matt Probert" <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> wrote in message
news:42e90e87.38626071@news.ntlworld.com...
>
> Thou jests? You must be familiar with Buddhists and Quakers? The
> Quakers are often known as "The Society of Friends", suffice to say
> they are all pacifists.
>
I meant I really dont know enough about them to comment, never having spoken
to a Quaker of Buddhist.
| |
| Matt Probert 2005-07-30, 7:38 pm |
| Once upon a time, far far away "William Tasso"
<SpamBlocked@tbdata.com> muttered
>Writing in news:alt.www.webmaster
> From the safety of the NTL cafeteria
>Matt Probert <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> said:
>
>
>no. why? how? I don't know of any distinguishing marks that would
>enable identification.
>
ROTFL!
You crack me up!
Ever heard of "Kung Fu" ? Chinese monks with bald heads and orange
robes! (cliched, but it get's the message across).
Matt
| |
| Matt Probert 2005-07-30, 7:38 pm |
| Once upon a time, far far away "CJM" <cjmnew04@REMOVEMEyahoo.co.uk>
muttered
>
>"Matt Probert" <comments@probertencyclopaedia.com> wrote in message
>news:42e90e87.38626071@news.ntlworld.com...
>
>
>I meant I really dont know enough about them to comment, never having spoken
>to a Quaker of Buddhist.
>
Sorry, fair comment. Suffice to say pacifism is central to both
beliefs.
Matt
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|