| Author |
Reducing googlebot crawl rate
|
|
| Matt Probert 2005-12-31, 6:16 am |
| Further to my queries regarding the rate at which Googlebot spiders, I
have received the following official information from Google:
"our robots do not currently recognize the Crawl-delay command [in
robots.txt] but we are able to change the rate by your email request."
Regards
Matt
--
The Probert Encyclopaedia - Beyond Britannica
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com
| |
| Blinky the Shark 2005-12-31, 6:23 pm |
| Matt Probert wrote:
> "our robots do not currently recognize the Crawl-delay command [in
> robots.txt] but we are able to change the rate by your email request."
An actual response from Google? Isn't that pretty much unheard of?
--
Blinky
Killfiling all posts from Google Groups
Details: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
| |
| Charles Sweeney 2005-12-31, 6:23 pm |
| Matt Probert wrote
> Further to my queries regarding the rate at which Googlebot spiders, I
> have received the following official information from Google:
>
> "our robots do not currently recognize the Crawl-delay command [in
> robots.txt] but we are able to change the rate by your email request."
That's interesting, bespoke crawling. Potential administrative nightmare
with the number of sites they list.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
| |
| Mark Goodge 2005-12-31, 6:24 pm |
| On 31 Dec 2005 12:24:37 GMT, Charles Sweeney put finger to keyboard
and typed:
>Matt Probert wrote
>
>
>That's interesting, bespoke crawling. Potential administrative nightmare
>with the number of sites they list.
Only if a lot of people email asking them to change it. Having a field
for crawl rate in their site database is pretty straightforward,
especially since their system does crawl different sites at different
rates - my guess would be that normally, this is determined by
whatever algorithms decide on how important a site is. And, given that
such a mechanism exists, a manual override for the automated rate
control isn't that much more complex.
What would be more useful, of course, is for their spider to read the
Crawl-delay line in robots.txt and update the database from that. If
enough people email them to ask for a manual rate change, that might
just encourage them to implement it :-)
Mark
--
http://www.OrangeHedgehog.com - RSS feeds and Google Adsense tools
"My light will shine so brightly it will blind you"
| |
| Charles Sweeney 2005-12-31, 6:24 pm |
| Mark Goodge wrote
> On 31 Dec 2005 12:24:37 GMT, Charles Sweeney put finger to keyboard
> and typed:
[color=darkred]
> Only if a lot of people email asking them to change it.
Absolutely.
--
Charles Sweeney
http://CharlesSweeney.com
| |
| Mark Goodge 2005-12-31, 6:24 pm |
| On 31 Dec 2005 14:51:29 GMT, Charles Sweeney put finger to keyboard
and typed:
>Mark Goodge wrote
>
>
>
>
>Absolutely.
I suspect, though, that the number of requests to have crawling slowed
down will be small enough to be manageable. Most people - especially
those who have already swallowed the SEO snake oil - would prefer
crawling to be speeded up. But the answer to that request is always
going to be simply "no".
Mark
--
http://www.MineOfUseless.info - everything you never needed to know!
"And so we're told this is the golden age"
| |
| Brian Wakem 2005-12-31, 6:24 pm |
| Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 31 Dec 2005 14:51:29 GMT, Charles Sweeney put finger to keyboard
> and typed:
>
>
> I suspect, though, that the number of requests to have crawling slowed
> down will be small enough to be manageable. Most people - especially
> those who have already swallowed the SEO snake oil - would prefer
> crawling to be speeded up. But the answer to that request is always
> going to be simply "no".
>
> Mark
I would think most people have no idea at what rate their site is crawled,
or what problems it could cause.
--
Brian Wakem
Email: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/b.wakem/myemail.png
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |