|
|
|
| Comparative AgpGraphicsCard: Nvidia W0N!
Test:
PC:
mobo: factor ATX: socketA-MSI-KT3Ultra2 KT333-8235 (MS-6380E)-AMDK7
ram: (PC2700 333Mhz 256MB DDR/CL2.5 TwinmosDIMM)*2
cpu: AMD AthlonAX2100DMT3CAGOIA 1999 XP2100+ 1.73GHZ 256KL2 FSB 266MHZ
hd: 60GB-72maxtor-D740X-ata133-DiamondMaxPlus9
GraphcsCard:
bus AGP: asusV8170-nvidia-geforce4-MX440-SE-128DDR
bus AGP: atiRadeon9000-128mbDDR-Sapphire
avec:
'citt1.wrl' at 'http://web.tiscali.it/lafdsp'
su:
Cortona VRML Client 4.2 rel.93 with M$2kpro-sp2-DX8.1
see: citt1.wrl #...
{NVIDIA faster-render than ATI}
3D Software: Caligari trueSpace4.3 (ATI+/-=NVIDIA)
Thanks for attention and I have a question:
is best use a large file .wrl or use many Inline node for make
faster the navigation in the world with 5MB-around filesize not .gz
with medium-large size texture?
The world dimesion is approx l=100mt.
I have tried to decrease most possible the number of polygons
but I think that it is not (raginevolmente) this the factor that determines
the heaviness of the world as the management of the animations also more
fundamental.
My approach with the hud in any cases to determined unbelievable slowness
also in here cases where was owed only determine the actual position!
Creating more that other places of imagination where is fundamental
a good person graphic surrender for visualize a relaxing environment
where listen to of the good sound viewing that (cho) I have about me
he would like create places with a side of at least 500mt without duty use
of the lod node.
I have not used of DEF intention and USE node for the repetitive objects:
despite this also with objects of around 2500 repeated vertexes
without exaggerate didn't notice decelerations of kind.
In substance according to the newsgroup which be the dimension in mt. from
use
for a world with these characteristics not implementing interactions?
(only vision of environment and listen to sound more that other {sincopato}
and repetitive).
I use the Inline node for VRML effects or smallcode like tree repeated
or for what I am not able to behavior with Caligari-tS4.3
or more simply for what I don't know how to do in VRML(-:
(sorry for lensflare code error effects).
best regards, tsu.
| |
| gian. 2004-05-14, 10:29 pm |
| tsu wrote:
> Comparative AgpGraphicsCard: Nvidia W0N!
> Test:
> PC:
> mobo: factor ATX: socketA-MSI-KT3Ultra2 KT333-8235 (MS-6380E)-AMDK7
> ram: (PC2700 333Mhz 256MB DDR/CL2.5 TwinmosDIMM)*2
> cpu: AMD AthlonAX2100DMT3CAGOIA 1999 XP2100+ 1.73GHZ 256KL2 FSB 266MHZ
> hd: 60GB-72maxtor-D740X-ata133-DiamondMaxPlus9
> GraphcsCard:
> bus AGP: asusV8170-nvidia-geforce4-MX440-SE-128DDR
> bus AGP: atiRadeon9000-128mbDDR-Sapphire
> avec:
> 'citt1.wrl' at 'http://web.tiscali.it/lafdsp'
> su:
> Cortona VRML Client 4.2 rel.93 with M$2kpro-sp2-DX8.1
> see: citt1.wrl #...
> {NVIDIA faster-render than ATI}
> 3D Software: Caligari trueSpace4.3 (ATI+/-=NVIDIA)
>
> Thanks for attention and I have a question:
> is best use a large file .wrl or use many Inline node for make
> faster the navigation in the world with 5MB-around filesize not .gz
> with medium-large size texture?
> The world dimesion is approx l=100mt.
> I have tried to decrease most possible the number of polygons
> but I think that it is not (raginevolmente) this the factor that
> determines the heaviness of the world as the management of the animations
> also more fundamental.
> My approach with the hud in any cases to determined unbelievable slowness
> also in here cases where was owed only determine the actual position!
> Creating more that other places of imagination where is fundamental
> a good person graphic surrender for visualize a relaxing environment
> where listen to of the good sound viewing that (cho) I have about me
> he would like create places with a side of at least 500mt without duty use
> of the lod node.
> I have not used of DEF intention and USE node for the repetitive objects:
> despite this also with objects of around 2500 repeated vertexes
> without exaggerate didn't notice decelerations of kind.
> In substance according to the newsgroup which be the dimension in mt. from
> use
> for a world with these characteristics not implementing interactions?
> (only vision of environment and listen to sound more that other
> {sincopato} and repetitive).
> I use the Inline node for VRML effects or smallcode like tree repeated
> or for what I am not able to behavior with Caligari-tS4.3
> or more simply for what I don't know how to do in VRML(-:
> (sorry for lensflare code error effects).
>
>
>
> best regards, tsu.
Ho visto il mondo è mi è piaciuto buone le texture ottima
l'ambientazione un po pesantino per il mio personale computer
ma comunque scorrevole.
Continua cosi.
Sorry I don't speak English.
buy buy Gian.
| |
| Paul Aslin 2004-05-18, 7:42 pm |
| not really much of a surprise here.
Cortona isn't so good at dealing with very large scenes. It tends to
bug down with large numbers of animated objects also. You really
should use DEF/USE and PROTOs.
Try Blaxxun Contact 5.104 or BS Contact 6.1 these are alot faster even
when fed 3 Kilometer worlds.
Sound like your world is CPU bottlenecked and thusly more effected by
driver software changes and card specific optimizations within the
VRML plugin itself.
tsu <lafdsp@tiscali.it> wrote in message news:<c81inr$kcj$1@lacerta.tiscalinet.it>...
> Comparative AgpGraphicsCard: Nvidia W0N!
> Test:
> PC:
> mobo: factor ATX: socketA-MSI-KT3Ultra2 KT333-8235 (MS-6380E)-AMDK7
> ram: (PC2700 333Mhz 256MB DDR/CL2.5 TwinmosDIMM)*2
> cpu: AMD AthlonAX2100DMT3CAGOIA 1999 XP2100+ 1.73GHZ 256KL2 FSB 266MHZ
> hd: 60GB-72maxtor-D740X-ata133-DiamondMaxPlus9
> GraphcsCard:
> bus AGP: asusV8170-nvidia-geforce4-MX440-SE-128DDR
> bus AGP: atiRadeon9000-128mbDDR-Sapphire
> avec:
> 'citt1.wrl' at 'http://web.tiscali.it/lafdsp'
> su:
> Cortona VRML Client 4.2 rel.93 with M$2kpro-sp2-DX8.1
> see: citt1.wrl #...
> {NVIDIA faster-render than ATI}
> 3D Software: Caligari trueSpace4.3 (ATI+/-=NVIDIA)
>
> Thanks for attention and I have a question:
> is best use a large file .wrl or use many Inline node for make
> faster the navigation in the world with 5MB-around filesize not .gz
> with medium-large size texture?
> The world dimesion is approx l=100mt.
> I have tried to decrease most possible the number of polygons
> but I think that it is not (raginevolmente) this the factor that determines
> the heaviness of the world as the management of the animations also more
> fundamental.
> My approach with the hud in any cases to determined unbelievable slowness
> also in here cases where was owed only determine the actual position!
> Creating more that other places of imagination where is fundamental
> a good person graphic surrender for visualize a relaxing environment
> where listen to of the good sound viewing that (cho) I have about me
> he would like create places with a side of at least 500mt without duty use
> of the lod node.
> I have not used of DEF intention and USE node for the repetitive objects:
> despite this also with objects of around 2500 repeated vertexes
> without exaggerate didn't notice decelerations of kind.
> In substance according to the newsgroup which be the dimension in mt. from
> use
> for a world with these characteristics not implementing interactions?
> (only vision of environment and listen to sound more that other {sincopato}
> and repetitive).
> I use the Inline node for VRML effects or smallcode like tree repeated
> or for what I am not able to behavior with Caligari-tS4.3
> or more simply for what I don't know how to do in VRML(-:
> (sorry for lensflare code error effects).
>
>
>
> best regards, tsu.
| |
|
| Paul Aslin wrote:
> not really much of a surprise here.
>
> Cortona isn't so good at dealing with very large scenes. It tends to
> bug down with large numbers of animated objects also. You really
> should use DEF/USE and PROTOs.
>
> Try Blaxxun Contact 5.104 or BS Contact 6.1 these are alot faster even
> when fed 3 Kilometer worlds.
>
> Sound like your world is CPU bottlenecked and thusly more effected by
> driver software changes and card specific optimizations within the
> VRML plugin itself.
thank you, tsu.
| |
|
|
> Ho visto il mondo è mi è piaciuto buone le texture ottima
> l'ambientazione un po pesantino per il mio personale computer
> ma comunque scorrevole.
> Continua cosi.
> Sorry I don't speak English.
> buy buy Gian.
grazie gian, adesso il massimo è 160*80 circa.
escluso il dosso di delimitazione di 7mt.
ti faccio poi vedere. ric
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |