|
|
| David E. Ross 2006-04-17, 6:53 pm |
| A new working draft of the CSS2.1 specification was published on-line on
11 April. Does anyone know what changed since the previous (13 June
2005) working draft?
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>
Concerned about someone (e.g., Pres. Bush) snooping
into your E-mail? Use PGP.
See my <http://www.rossde.com/PGP/>
| |
| Spartanicus 2006-04-17, 6:53 pm |
| "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.not> wrote:
>A new working draft of the CSS2.1 specification was published on-line on
>11 April. Does anyone know what changed since the previous (13 June
>2005) working draft?
From the W3C's www-style mailing list announcement of the new draft:
>There are also two versions with highlighted differences since the
>previous draft and since the CSS2 Recommendation of 1998:
>
>http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-update...0613-diff/cover
>http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-update...0411-diff/cover
>
>(They are automatically generated by comparing words; they may not be
>very helpful when a whole paragraph has been added or removed...)
--
Spartanicus
| |
| frederick@southernskies.co.uk 2006-04-17, 6:53 pm |
| Spartanicus wrote:[color=darkred]
> "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.not> wrote:
>
>
> From the W3C's www-style mailing list announcement of the new draft:
>
Ooh, that's good! Might've been helpful if they'd been linked to from
the main document, though!!
--
AGw.
|
|
|
|
| Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |