Stylesheets - table and IE

Author

table and IE

Cezar

2004-11-20, 7:15 am

Hi!

Here is a table http://tinyurl.com/4eh7s, that in IE is cut from right
side. In Opera 7.54 and FF 1.0 is not cutted.

Anyone know why ?

--
Regards,
Cezar

Michael Vilain

2004-11-20, 7:15 pm

In article <cnn861$lqm$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>,
Cezar <cezaryk@imail.net.pl> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Here is a table http://tinyurl.com/4eh7s, that in IE is cut from right
> side. In Opera 7.54 and FF 1.0 is not cutted.
>
> Anyone know why ?

This site displayed OK on Safari, Mozilla, Camino, FF, Opera, Netscape
7.2. But not on IE or iCab. iCab says it doesn't support XHTML yet, so
at least there's a reason why.

What happens if you recode for HTML 4.01? My guess the site is to
"bleeding edge" for IE.

--
DeeDee, don't press that button! DeeDee! NO! Dee...

Cezar

2004-11-20, 7:15 pm

"Michael Vilain <vilain@spamcop.net>" napisa³(a):
> In article <cnn861$lqm$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>,
> Cezar <cezaryk@imail.net.pl> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> This site displayed OK on Safari, Mozilla, Camino, FF, Opera, Netscape
> 7.2. But not on IE or iCab. iCab says it doesn't support XHTML yet, so
> at least there's a reason why.
>
> What happens if you recode for HTML 4.01? My guess the site is to
> "bleeding edge" for IE.
>
Well, I don't think that it could be depend on XHTML, rather CSS. Hmmm..
maybe CSS is render invalid by IE ? Who knows ;-)

--
Regards,
Cezar

Jan Roland Eriksson

2004-11-20, 7:15 pm

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:06:05 +0100, Cezar <cezaryk@imail.net.pl> wrote:

>Here is a table http://tinyurl.com/4eh7s

If you ask me it's kind of unreliable on a long term basis to allow for
a second site outside of your control to redirect to your own pages.

What's wrong with this one direct?

http://demo.ikeris.com/ics15/test/test3.html

>that in IE is cut from right side.
>In Opera 7.54 and FF 1.0 is not cutted.
>Anyone know why ?

Without any deeper investigation on my part it still seems like you are
using fixed width specifications for that table.

Know then that IE is lousy when it comes to math calculations on widths,
calculation round off errors are legio just about every where you can
have them.

Lose the fixed stuff and allow your presentation to be more "fluid" and
you do stand a chance to beat even MSIE.

--
Rex

Cezar

2004-11-21, 7:15 am

Jan Roland Eriksson napisaÅ‚(a):
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:06:05 +0100, Cezar <cezaryk@imail.net.pl> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> If you ask me it's kind of unreliable on a long term basis to allow for
> a second site outside of your control to redirect to your own pages.
>
> What's wrong with this one direct?
>
> http://demo.ikeris.com/ics15/test/test3.html

Nothing wrong. Just is smaller. ;-)

>
>
> Without any deeper investigation on my part it still seems like you are
> using fixed width specifications for that table.

Yes. I use fixed width.

> Know then that IE is lousy when it comes to math calculations on widths,
> calculation round off errors are legio just about every where you can
> have them.
>
> Lose the fixed stuff and allow your presentation to be more "fluid" and
> you do stand a chance to beat even MSIE.

What a pity, because some presentation must be in fixed width. I think
about it more. Thanks for advice.

--
Regards,
Cezar

Cezar

2004-11-22, 4:15 am