This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters
Home > Archive > Site Ratings & Reviews > April 2007 > Critique site please
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Critique site please
|
|
|
|
| Jim Moe 2007-04-26, 6:18 pm |
| nshiflett@XXXXXXXXXX wrote:
> http://douchebagz.com
>
> I'm looking for more content.
>
Well, there's John Edwards as voted by South Park ("Douche Bag of the
Universe").
Does not validate. See
<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbo...uchebagz.com%2F>
The headlines seem excessively large.
The width is 1300px, about 40% larger than my normal viewport width (830
px).
Aside from a collection of generally unpleasant people the purpose of
your site is obscure.
--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
| |
| nshiflett@gmail.com 2007-04-26, 6:18 pm |
| On Apr 26, 2:15 pm, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA...@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:
> nshifl...@XXXXXXXXXX wrote:
>
>
> Well, there's John Edwards as voted by South Park ("Douche Bag of the
> Universe").
> Does not validate. See
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbo...douchebagz.c...>
> The headlines seem excessively large.
> The width is 1300px, about 40% larger than my normal viewport width (830
> px).
> Aside from a collection of generally unpleasant people the purpose of
> your site is obscure.
>
> --
> jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
> (Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
Thanks for the response, you are absolutely right on with the width
issue. I'm going to make it a bit more narrow. Validation on this one
is tricky I'm having to make this site work with WordPress, I had it
validating but for some reason the page was not displaying corectly in
IE so I butchered it. This site is basically just a joke, but I did
get cut-off in traffic about an hour ago so I've got a candidate to
put on the site.
Regards
| |
| Chris F.A. Johnson 2007-04-27, 3:19 am |
| On 2007-04-26, nshiflett@XXXXXXXXXX wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2:15 pm, Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSPA...@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:
....[color=darkred]
....[color=darkred]
> Thanks for the response, you are absolutely right on with the width
> issue. I'm going to make it a bit more narrow.
Don't do that. It'll look silly and skinny in my window which is
sometimes 1300px or more. Don't make it ANY specific width. Unless
you tell them not to, browsers will fill the window, no matter what
width it is. Why add something that reduces the effectiveness of the
page?
If you need to specify any widths, use percentages or ems. The same
goes for font sizes.
> Validation on this one
> is tricky I'm having to make this site work with WordPress, I had it
> validating but for some reason the page was not displaying corectly in
> IE so I butchered it. This site is basically just a joke, but I did
> get cut-off in traffic about an hour ago so I've got a candidate to
> put on the site.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
|
|
|
| | Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com Software forum Computer Hardware reviews |
|