This is Interesting: Free Magazines for Graphics designers and webmasters  


Home > Archive > Site Ratings & Reviews > September 2004 > Review my site, sigh





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Review my site, sigh
Always More Questions

2004-09-10, 7:15 am

I hope you will be gentle, at least I have it validated.

There are a few links that aren't correct, but I'm working on those.

I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
group?)

This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.

Thanks

http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/
The Doormouse

2004-09-10, 12:17 pm

Always More Questions <thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:

> http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/


The HTML is fine. Now go to one of the deisgn groups and they'll critique
the design .... :)

One note, though - by including the CSS inline you have eliminated one of
the main benefits of CSS, which is linking.

The Doormouse

--
The Doormouse cannot be reached by e-mail without her permission.
Beauregard T. Shagnasty

2004-09-10, 12:17 pm

Quoth the raven Always More Questions:

> I hope you will be gentle, at least I have it validated.
>
> There are a few links that aren't correct, but I'm working on
> those.


You should get your facts correct. You say:

"The Yankees are baseball's most dominant team at every position. They
have won a record 22 World Series and 33 AL pennants..."

The Yanks have won 26 World Series and 39 AL pennants.

> This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.
> http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/


Is this your only page? All the links seem to lead to other sites. If
so, ok. If not, move your CSS into a separate file and link to it.

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
Neal

2004-09-10, 7:17 pm

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
<thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:

> This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.
>
> http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/


Great you're using CSS, but I'm sorry, have to take a pass. I'm a devout
Red Sox fan, I'm sure you understand. I kinda get sick.

Have fun, all.
Always More Questions

2004-09-10, 7:17 pm

In article <Xns95603ACB51F64doormouseattnet@68.12.19.6>,
The Doormouse <doormouse@att.net> wrote:

> Always More Questions <thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> The HTML is fine. Now go to one of the deisgn groups and they'll critique
> the design .... :)
>
> One note, though - by including the CSS inline you have eliminated one of
> the main benefits of CSS, which is linking.
>
> The Doormouse


Thank you. It was my intention to make the style sheet external. I kept
it there so it would be easier to be critiqued.
Always More Questions

2004-09-10, 7:17 pm

In article <Coj0d.21431$2s.10552@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:

> Quoth the raven Always More Questions:
>
>
> You should get your facts correct. You say:
>
> "The Yankees are baseball's most dominant team at every position. They
> have won a record 22 World Series and 33 AL pennants..."
>
> The Yanks have won 26 World Series and 39 AL pennants.


That's what I get for cheating off of a sixth graders paper. Thanks


>
>
> Is this your only page? All the links seem to lead to other sites. If
> so, ok. If not, move your CSS into a separate file and link to it.


It's the pilot page so I can learn how to do it. Eventually, for better
or worse, there will be a page for each team, each team in the other
leagues, etc.

Thanks again.
Always More Questions

2004-09-10, 7:17 pm

In article <opsd4apsgy6v6656@news.individual.net>,
Neal <neal413@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
> <thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Great you're using CSS, but I'm sorry, have to take a pass. I'm a devout
> Red Sox fan, I'm sure you understand. I kinda get sick.
>
> Have fun, all.


I kinda like the Dolphins, but that's another time and another site.

Thanks
Frogleg

2004-09-11, 7:17 pm

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
<thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:

>I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
>group?)


You could try alt.desgin.graphics, but people here are quite willing
to argue about colors.
>
>This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.


I don't think anyone does. The collapsible-ness of your main page
becomes a drawback when the window is made smaller. Seems like a case
of 6 of one; half-dozen of another, although I think I'd prefer a
horizontal scrollbar to one word (partially hidden) lines of text.
>
>http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/


Neal

2004-09-11, 7:17 pm

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:34:29 GMT, Frogleg <frogleg@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
> <thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> You could try alt.desgin.graphics, but people here are quite willing
> to argue about colors.
>
> I don't think anyone does. The collapsible-ness of your main page
> becomes a drawback when the window is made smaller. Seems like a case
> of 6 of one; half-dozen of another, although I think I'd prefer a
> horizontal scrollbar to one word (partially hidden) lines of text.
>


Took a really fast peek. The real problem is the left column is fixed due
to the image, so the other two have to smush way too much. That's a
problem with the basic design. That image must be made smaller or have
very narrow content next to it. As it is, it's impractical.

Oh no, I think I just saw Jeter. I have to close it up, sorry.
Always More Questions

2004-09-11, 7:17 pm

In article <opsd6jvaqy6v6656@news.individual.net>,
Neal <neal413@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:34:29 GMT, Frogleg <frogleg@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
> Took a really fast peek. The real problem is the left column is fixed due
> to the image, so the other two have to smush way too much. That's a
> problem with the basic design. That image must be made smaller or have
> very narrow content next to it. As it is, it's impractical.
>
> Oh no, I think I just saw Jeter. I have to close it up, sorry.


I'd truly like to have a smaller better image, but the existing image
does have quite an impact. As it is, there probably won't be too much
content (I'm trying for more).

Thanks for the critique.
Frogleg

2004-09-14, 4:15 am

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:18:23 -0700, Always More Questions
<thanIhaveanswersfor@domain.invalid> wrote:

>I'm not entirely thrilled with the colors (but that would be another
>group?)


You could try alt.desgin.graphics, but people here are quite willing
to argue about colors.
>
>This is my first CSS page and I still don't understand all of it.


I don't think anyone does. The collapsible-ness of your main page
becomes a drawback when the window is made smaller. Seems like a case
of 6 of one; half-dozen of another, although I think I'd prefer a
horizontal scrollbar to one word (partially hidden) lines of text.
>
>http://access-the-best-tickets.com/yankees3/


Sponsored Links


Copyright 2003 - 2008 forum4designers.com  Software forum  Computer Hardware reviews